Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:45:47.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila 8. Adaptation to a New Diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Forbes W. Robertson
Forbes W. Robertson
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Populations of Drosophila melanogaster have been adapted to a new, initially unfavourable diet by adding to the food medium the chelating agent, EDTA, which lowers survival, lengthens development and reduces body size, according to the concentration.

2. Six populations were allowed to adapt to the new diet without intervention and compared with two additional populations in which there was either artificial selection for fast development time or in which the effects of variation in development time were minimized and higher egg production was favoured instead.

3. All populations adapted successfully and some were able to grow on medium with EDTA concentrations which were lethal for the original population.

4. Under uncrowded conditions on EDTA-free medium, in seven out of the eight populations, body size was reduced by about 7% below the level of the original population and the larval period was shorter in several instances. But in the population in which higher egg production was favoured, body size was 7% greater than in the original population and 16% greater than the average of the other EDTA-adapted populations. This contrast was attributed either to intense natural selection for shorter development time or to selection for a higher rate of egg production, which is positively correlated with body size when larvae are grown on sub-optimal conditions.

5. Under crowded, competitive conditions, the fitness of the EDTA-adapted and the original populations was reversed according to the presence or absence of EDTA.

6. Genetic differences between one of the EDTA-adapted populations and the original population were studied by using marked inversions to interchange chromosome pairs. Larvae of the alternative genotypes were grown on different diets and adaptation was shown to have involved changes in all major chromosomes and also substantial, complementary interaction between non-homologous pairs. Substitution of the third pair of chromosomes from the original Pacific stock in the background of the adapted strain led to complete sterility of females, on all diets tested, and lethality of both sexes at higher levels of EDTA.

7. The creation of new equilibria, by manipulating the relative importance of components of fitness, in the course of adaptation to a new environment, offers a valuable technique for studying the selective forces which influence the mean value of quantitative characters generally.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , September 1966 , pp. 165 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

References

REFERENCES

Bakker, K. (1959). Feeding period, growth pupation in larvae of the Drosophila melanogaster. Entomologia exp. appl. 2, 171–186.Google Scholar
Church, R. B. & Robertson, F. W. (1966). Biochemical analysis of genetic differences in the growth of Drosophila. Genet. Res. 7, 383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heed, W. B. & Kircher, H. W. (1965). Unique sterol in the ecology and nutrition of Drosophila pachea. Science, N.Y. 149 (3865), 758–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, F. W. (1957). Studies in quantitative inheritance. X. Genetic variation of ovary size in Drosophila. J. Genet. 55, 410–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, F. W. (1963). The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. 6. The genetic correlation between the duration of the larval period and body size in relation to larval diet. Genet. Res. 4, 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, F. W. (1964). The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. 7. The role of canalization in the stability of growth relations: Genet. Res. 5, 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, F. W. & Reeve, E. C. R. (1955). Studies in quantitative inheritance. VIII. Further analyses of heterosis in crosses between inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Z. induht. Abstamm.- u. VererbLehre 86, 439–458.Google Scholar
Steffensen, D. (1957). Dwarf Drosophila produced by ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid. Nature, Lond. 180, 390–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar