Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T14:29:22.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Propitious contrast’: Romanian borrowing in a Balkan mirror, 1878–1913

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2022

Andreea-Alexandra Maerean ,
Maja Pedersen  and
Paul Sharp Open the ORCID record for Paul Sharp [Opens in a new window]
Andreea-Alexandra Maerean*
Affiliation:
European Commission (DG Economic and Financial Affairs)
Maja Pedersen*
Affiliation:
University of Southern Denmark
Paul Sharp*
Affiliation:
University of Southern Denmark
*
Andreea-Alexandra Maerean, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission, Rue de la Loi 170 / Wetstraat 170, 1049 Brussels, Belgium, email: [email protected]
Maja Pedersen and Paul Sharp, Department of Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark, email: [email protected]; [email protected].
Maja Pedersen and Paul Sharp, Department of Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark, email: [email protected]; [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How was Romania able to borrow cheaply on the international capital markets before World War I? We explore this within the context of its three southeast European neighbours, Bulgaria, Greece and Serbia, using a novel dataset of monthly bond prices from the Berlin and London stock exchanges. A comparison of country characteristics and panel data analysis suggests that Romania was able to borrow under more favourable conditions due to its abundant natural resources and desirable exports.

Keywords

creditworthinessemerging marketsRomaniasovereign debt

JEL classification

E5: Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit N2: Financial Markets and Institutions G1: General Financial Markets E4: Money and Interest Rates
Type
Article
Information
Financial History Review , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , April 2023 , pp. 100 - 123
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Association for Banking and Financial History

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank the journal editor, two excellent anonymous reviewers, Philipp Ager, Alina Blejan, Carsten Burhop, Stéphanie Collet, Peter Sandholt Jensen, Markus Lampe, Eoin McLaughlin, Kris Mitchener, Matthias Morys, Stefan Nikolic, Martin Pontzen and John Turner for feedback, help and suggestions. We would also like to thank Minhua Wan at the London Stock Exchange Project, Yale School of Management for providing access to some of the data from London used in this article, and to Manuel Marx for his conscientious collection of much of the Berlin data, the latter of which was in part made possible thanks to a generous Exploratory Travel and Data Grant from the Economic History Association. Finally, thanks are also due to Frederikke Frehr Kristensen for excellent research assistance.

References

Accominotti, O., Flandreau, M. and Rezzik, R. (2011). The spread of empire: Clio and the measurement of colonial borrowing costs. Economic History Review, 64(2), pp. 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alquist, R. (2010). How important is liquidity risk for sovereign bond risk premia? Evidence from the London Stock Exchange. Journal of International Economics, 82(2), pp. 219–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alquist, R. and Chabot, B. R. (2011). Did gold-standard adherence reduce sovereign capital costs? Journal of Monetary Economics, 58(3), pp. 262–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alquist, R., Chabot, B. R. and Yamarthy, R. (2020). The price of property rights: institutions, finance, and economic growth. Finance, and Economic Growth, 19 August.Google Scholar
Avramov, R. (2006). The Bulgarian National Bank in a historical perspective: shaping an institution, searching for a monetary standard. Proceedings of the First Annual SEEMHN Conference, Sofia.Google Scholar
Banu, A. (2012). Datoria publica a Romaniei 1864–1949. Bucharest: Oscar Print.Google Scholar
Bersch, J. and Kaminsky, G. L. (2008). Financial globalization in the 19th century: Germany as a financial center. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Birdal, M. (2010). The Political Economy of Ottoman Public Debt: Insolvency and European Financial Control in the Late Nineteenth Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchard, E. (1951) State Insolvency and Foreign Bondholders: General Principles. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, M. D. (1991). Financial Crises. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bordo, M. D. and Flandreau, M. (2003). Core periphery, exchange rate regimes and globalization. In Bordo, M. D., Taylor, A. and Williamson, J. G. (eds.), Globalization in Historical Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, M. D. and Kydland, F. E. (1996). The gold standard as a commitment mechanism. In Bayoumi, T., Eichengreen, B. and Taylor, M. P. (eds.), Modern Perspectives on the Gold Standard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, M. D. and Rockoff, H. (1996). The gold standard as a good housekeeping seal of approval. NBER Working Paper no. 5340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, M. D. and Schwartz, A. (1996). Why currency clashes between internal and external stability goals end in currency crises, 1797–1994. Open Economies Review, 7, pp. 437–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R. J., Cowan, K. and Kearns, J. (2005). Fear of sudden stops: lessons from Australia and Chile. The Journal of Policy Reform, 8(4), pp. 313–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, M. A. and Williamson, J. G. (2004). Wealth bias in the first global capital market book, 1870–1913. Economic Journal, 114, pp. 304–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collet, S. (2012). Sovereign bonds: odious debts and state succession. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Free University of Brussels.Google Scholar
Collet, S. (2013). The financial penalty for ‘unfair’ debt: the case of Cuban bonds at the time of independence. European Review of Economic History, 17(3), pp. 364–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantinescu, N. N. (1994). Romania's Economic History: From the Beginnings to World War II. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Romàne.Google Scholar
Daudin, G., Morys, M. and O'Rourke, K. H. (2010). Globalization, 1870–1914. In Broadberry, S. and O'Rourke, K. H. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Europe, vol. ii: 1870 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dicea, O. and Enachescu, M. E. (2000). The hydrocarbon past, present, and future of Romania – the world's first oil producer. The Leading Edge, 19(3), pp. 321–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, K., Fantacci, L. and Tunçer, C. (2010). Monetary policy in Southeast Europe in the transition from bimetallism to the gold standard. In Monetary Policy During Economic Crises: A Comparative and Historical Perspective. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual SEEMHN Conference, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Dimitrova, K. and Ivanov, M. (2013). Bulgaria from 1879 to 1947. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Dincecco, M. (2009). Political regimes and sovereign credit risk in Europe, 1750–1913. European Review of Economic History, 13, pp. 31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrovici, M. GH. (1934). Istoricul desvoltării economice şi financiare a României şi împrumuturile contractate 1823–1933. Bucharest: Universul Print.Google Scholar
Einaudi, L. (2007). Monetary separation and European convergence in the Balkans in the 19th century. Proceedings of the Second Annual SEEMHN Conference, Vienna.Google Scholar
Esteves, R. P. (2013). The bondholder, the sovereign, and the banker: sovereign debt and bondholders’ protection before 1914. European Review of Economic History, 17, pp. 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, R. P. and Tunçer, A. C. (2016). Feeling the blues: moral hazard and debt dilution in Eurobonds before 1914. Journal of International Money and Finance, 65, pp. 46–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feis, H. (1930). Europe: The World's Banker, 1870–1914. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fenn, C. (1883). Fenn's Compendium of the English and Foreign Funds, Debts and Revenues of All Nations. London.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. and Schularick, M. (2006). The empire effect: the determinants of country risk in the first age of globalization, 1880–1913. Journal of Economic History, 66, pp. 283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, N. and Schularick, M. (2012). The ‘thin film of gold’: monetary rules and policy credibility. European Review of Economic History, 16, pp. 384–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishlow, A. (1985). Lessons from the past: capital markets during the 19th century and the interwar period. International Organization, 39(3), pp. 383–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flandreau, M., Le Cacheux, J. and Zumer, F. (1998). Stability without a pact? Lessons from the European gold standard, 1880–1913. Economic Policy, 13(26), pp. 117–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flandreau, M. and Zumer, F. (2004). The Making of Global Finance 1880–1913. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Flores Zendejas, J. H. (2020). The entanglements of domestic polities: public debt and european interventions in Latin America. In Barreyre, N. and Delalande, N. (eds.), A World of Public Debts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gardner, L. (2017). Colonialism or supersanctions: sovereignty and debt in West Africa, 1871–1914. European Review of Economic History, 21(2), pp. 236–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, L. (2020). Trading sovereignty for capital? Public debt in West Africa, 1871–1914. In Barreyre, N. and Delalande, N. (eds.), World of Public Debts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gnjatović, D. (2009). Foreign long term government loans of Serbia 1862–1914. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual SEEMHN Conference, Belgrade.Google Scholar
HABER, S. and MENALDO, V. (2011). Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse. American Political Science Review, 105(1), pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimber, A. (1920). Kimber's Record of Government Debts. New York.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. and Aliber, R. Z. (2011). Manias, Panics and Crashes: A History of Financial Crashes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lains, P. (2002). Southern European economic backwardness revisited: the role of open economy forces in Portugal and the Balkans, 1870–1913. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 50(1), pp. 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampe, J. R. (1975). Varieties of unsuccessful industrialization: the Balkan States before 1914. The Journal of Economic History, 35(1), pp. 56–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampe, J. R. (1982). Balkan Economic History, 1550–1950. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lampe, J. R. and Jackson, M. R. (1982). Balkan Economic History, 1550–1950: From Imperial Borderlands to Developing Nations. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lazaretou, S. (2005). The drachma, foreign creditors, and the international monetary system: tales of a currency during the 19th and the early 20th centuries. Explorations in Economic History, 42, pp. 202–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levandis, J. A. (1944). The Greek Foreign Debt and the Great Powers, 1821–1898. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manasse, P., Roubini, N. and Schimmelpfennig, A. (2003). Predicting sovereign debt crises. IMF Working Paper WP03/221.Google Scholar
Mauro, P., Sussman, N. and Yafeh, Y. (2006). Emerging Markets and Financial Globalization: Sovereign Bond Spreads in 1870–1913 and Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. (ed.). (1998). International Historical Statistics: Europe, 1750–1993. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mitchener, K. J. and Weidenmier, M. (2005). Empire, public goods, and the Roosevelt corollary. Journal of Economic History, 65(3), pp. 658–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchener, K. J. and Weidenmier, M. (2009). Are hard pegs ever credible in emerging markets? Evidence from the classical gold standard. NBER Working Paper no. 15401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchener, K. J. and Weidenmier, M. (2010). Supersanctions and sovereign debt repayment. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29, pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morys, M. (2017). A century of monetary reform in South-East Europe: from political autonomy to the gold standard, 1815–1910. Financial History Review, 24, pp. 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mureşan, M. and Văsioiu, O. M. (2008). Appreciations regarding external capital in Romanian economy in the second half of the 19th century and the first two decades of the 20th century. The Annals of The ‘Ştefan cel Mare’ University Suceava, 8(1:8), pp. 71–6.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, M. and Taylor, A. M. (2003). Sovereign risk, credibility and the gold standard: 1870–1913 versus 1925–31. Economic Journal, 113(487), pp. 241–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oosterlinck, K. (2018). The historical context of sovereign debt. In Bantekas, I. and Lumina, C. (eds.), Sovereign Debt and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oosterlinck, K. and Ureche-Rangau, L. (2012). Interwar Romanian sovereign bonds: the impact of diplomacy, politics and the economy. Financial History Review, 19(2), pp. 219–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, C., Rogoff, and SAVASTANO, K., M. (2003). Debt intolerance. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp. 1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, C. and Frary, D. P. (1918). How the World Votes: The Story of Democratic Development in Elections, 2 vols. Springfield, MA: C. A. Nichols Co.Google Scholar
Sojic, M. and Djurdjevic, L. (2006). National Bank of Serbia 1884–2006: establishment and beginning of operation. Proceedings of the First Annual SEEMHN Conference, Sofia.Google Scholar
Stasavage, D. (2016). What we can learn from the early history of sovereign debt? Explorations in Economic History, 59, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoenescu, G. V., Blejan, E. and Costache, B. (2008). The National Bank of Romania and its issue of banknotes: between necessity and possibility, 1880–1914. Proceedings of the Third Annual SEEMHN Conference, Athens.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoenescu, G. V., Blejan, E. and Costache, B. (2011). Modern Romania's monetary system: from the bimetallism of the Latin monetary union to gold monometallism. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual SEEMHN Conference, Bucharest.Google Scholar
Sumner, W. G. et al. (1896). A History of Banking in All the Leading Nations, vol. 4. New York: Journal of Commerce and Commercial Bulletin.Google Scholar
Sussman, N. and Yafeh, Y. (2000). Institutions, reforms, and country risk: lessons from Japanese government debt in the Meiji era. Journal of Economic History, 60(2), pp. 442–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suter, C. and Stamm, H. (1992). Coping with global debt crises: debt settlements, 1820 to 1986. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 34(2), pp. 645–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunçer, A. C. (2015). Sovereign Debt and International Financial Control: The Middle East and the Balkans, 1870–1914. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunçer, A. C. (2020). Leveraging foreign control: reform in the Ottoman Empire. In Barreyre, N. and Delalande, N. (eds.), World of Public Debts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. G. (2002). Winners and losers over two centuries of globalization. NBER Working Paper no. 9161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, W. (1951). State Insolvency and Foreign Bondholders, vol. ii: Selected Case Histories of Governmental Foreign Bond Defaults and Debt Readjustments. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar