Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:36:44.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Design Problems in Crop Experimentation. I. The Use of Blocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

S. C. Pearce
S. C. Pearce
Affiliation:
ASRU Ltd, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field experiments are commonly designed in blocks and there are sound reasons for using them, for example, control of unwanted environmental differences and administrative convenience. If used, they should be chosen to correspond to perceived differences in the site or to simplify farm operations and not merely to conform to statistical desiderata. Thus, it is not essential that each must contain one plot for each treatment, though there are advantages if they do. Some of the consequences of using other block sizes are examined, it being borne in mind that modern computer packages will perform most of the tiresome arithmetic. The effectiveness of blocks is considered and it is noted that they sometimes do harm rather than good. The analysis of variance is explained in terms of strata as used in many modern computer programs and is extended to include the recovery of information and resolvability. Recommendations are made as to randomization.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 191 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, D. F. & Herzberg, A. M. (1980). Data: a Collection of Problems and Data from Many Fields for the Student and Research Worker in Statistics. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. A. (1991). Strata for randomized experiments (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B53:27–78.Google Scholar
Brewer, A. B. & Mead, R. (1986). Continuous second order models of spatial variation with applications to the efficiency of field crop experiments (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A149:319–348.Google Scholar
Jenkin, J. F., Bainbridge, A., Dyke, G. V. & Todd, A. D. (1979). An investigation into inter-plot interactions, in experiments with mildew on barley, using balanced designs. Annals of Applied Biology 92:11–28.Google Scholar
Mead, R. (1990). The non-orthogonal design of experiments (with discussion). journal of the Royal Statistical Society A153:151–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelder, J. A. (1965). The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure: Block structure and null hypothesis of variance. Proceedings of the Royal Society A283:163–178.Google Scholar
Pearce, S. C. (1978). The control of environmental variation in some West Indian maize experiments. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 55:97–106.Google Scholar
Pearce, S. C. (1980). Randomized blocks and some alternatives: a study in tropical conditions. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 57:1–10.Google Scholar
Pearce, S. C. (1992). Data analysis in agricultural experimentation. I. Contrasts of interest. Experimental Agriculture 28:245–253.Google Scholar
Pearce, S. C. & Greenham, D. W. P. (1955). A short history of research station land in the parish of East Mailing. Annual Report of the East Mailing Research Station for 1954, 54–63.Google Scholar
Pearce, S. C. & Greenham, D. W. P. (1957). A short history of research station land in the parishes of Ditton and Aylesford. Annual Report of the East Malting Research Station for 1956, 49–53.Google Scholar
Tukey, J. W. (1937). One degree of freedom for non-additivity. Biometrics 5:232–242.Google Scholar
Yates, F. (1940). The recovery of inter-block information in balanced incomplete block designs. Annals of Eugenics 10:317–325.Google Scholar