Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:24:10.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses to Grazing Intensity on the Transvaal Highveld

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

P. Gillard
P. Gillard
Affiliation:
Frankenwald Field Research Station, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The productivity of climax and serai grassland in South Africa was compared at three stocking rates with steers. On climax grassland, over nine years, gains per head at one steer per morgen (= 2·12 acres = 0·86 hectare) were not significantly greater than at two steers per morgen. Liveweight gains per morgen were 70 per cent higher at the heavier stocking rate and were 162 lb and 273 lb at one and two steers respectively. On serai grassland, over three seasons stocked at two steers and three steers per morgen, the liveweight gains per steer were significantly less at the higher stocking rate but there was no significant difference in the gains per morgen, which were 366 lb and 318 lb at two and three steers respectively. The liveweight gains on the seral grassland were significantly higher than on the climax grassland at the same stocking rate Calculation of the total digestible nutrients (T.D.N.) has shown that with heavier stocking more T.D.N. per morgen may be harvested on both grassland types. However, with heavy grazing the efficiency of conversion of T.D.N. into liveweight was less. The quality of the sward, measured in per cent crude protein, P2O5 and crude fibre was better at the heavier stocking owing to delayed maturity of the grass when it is continually grazed short.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 1966 , pp. 217 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acocks, J. P. H. (1953). Veld types of South Africa. Bot. Survey Mem. 28.Google Scholar
Anon. (1962). Pasture and range research techniques. Amer. Soc. Agron., Amer. Dairy Sci. Assoc., Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod., Amer. Soc. Range Mgt. New York: Comstock, Publ.Google Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and growth. New York: Reinhold Publ.Google Scholar
Crocker, R. L. (1952). Proc. 6th Int. Grassland Congr., I Pennsylvania, 770.Google Scholar
Foster, R. E. D. (1938). An investigating of the effects of seasonal overgrazing on the veld sward. M.Sc.(Agric.) Thesis, University of Pretoria.Google Scholar
Glover, J. & Dougall, H. W. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 55, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, P. E. & van Rensburg, H. J. (1938). S. Afr.J. Sci. 35, 274.Google Scholar
Irvine, L. O. F. (1941). The major veld types of the Northern Transvaal and their grazing management. D.Sc. Thesis, University of Pretoria.Google Scholar
Ivins, J. D. (1960). Proc. 8th Int. Grassland Congr., Reading, 459.Google Scholar
Kidder, R. W. (1946). J. Anim. Sci. 5, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambourne, J. L. & Reardon, T. F. (1963). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. J. (1944). Fmg in S. Afr. 19, 591.Google Scholar
Theron, G. C. (1937). Veld management studies at the School of Agriculture Potchefstroom. S. Afr. Dept. Agric., Prelim. rep. Bull. 166U.Google Scholar
van Rensburg, H. J. (1939). S. Afr. J. Sci. 37, 175.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. (1943). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 11, 191.Google Scholar
Weinman, H. (1940). S. Afr. J. Bot. 10, 131.Google Scholar