Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:24:48.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IMPROVING WHEAT YIELDS THROUGH N FERTILIZATION IN MEDITERRANEAN TUNISIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2011

C. MARIANO COSSANI ,
CHOKRI THABET ,
HAFEDH J. MELLOULI  and
GUSTAVO A. SLAFER
C. MARIANO COSSANI*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida, Centre UdL-IRTA, Av. Rovira Roure 191, 25198, Lleida, Spain
CHOKRI THABET
Affiliation:
Department of Economy and Rural Development, Institut Supérieur Agronomique de Chott Mériem, Chott Mériem, Tunisia
HAFEDH J. MELLOULI
Affiliation:
INRAT (National Agricultural Research Institute of Tunisia, Rue Hedi Karray, 2049 Ariana, Tunisia
GUSTAVO A. SLAFER
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida, Centre UdL-IRTA, Av. Rovira Roure 191, 25198, Lleida, Spain ICREA (Catalonian Institution for Research and Advanced Studies), Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
*
‡Corresponding author. Current address: CIMMYT, Km. 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, El Batan, Texcoco, Edo. de México CP (56130)México. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Rainfed wheat is frequently exposed to periods of water stress that generate low and variable grain yields. Field experiments (with studies in Tunisia and Morocco) carried out in the context of a European research project of co-operation with Mediterranean partner countries (WatNitMED) showed that nitrogen (N) fertilization may be a tool to increase productivity of rainfed wheat in Mediterranean environments. However, most farmers in Northern Africa do not fertilize their rainfed cereals. In the present study, we aimed to analyse whether the generally accepted positive yield response to N fertilization in rainfed Mediterranean conditions corresponds to actual advantages achieved in the fields of working farmers, attempting a further up-scaling of knowledge from field experiments to real fields. We attempted to apply research results to Tunisian working farmers’ fields by conducting a farm pilot experiment. The pilot experiment was conducted in two different regions (a low-yielding region and a relatively high-yielding region) of cereal production in Tunisia, where wheat production represents typical rainfed Mediterranean agro-ecosystems in North Africa. First, we compared the yield response to N fertilization against unfertilized conditions (a common situation for many of the farmers in North Africa), and secondly we compared what the farmers suggested as an optimal N fertilization practice in their fields against the WatNitMED's recommendation which was based on an N-fertilization scheme derived from field experiments from the European research project in Mediterranean conditions. The WatNitMED fertilization scheme suggested higher rates of fertilization than those considered optimal by farmers (on average 40 kg N ha−1 higher). Unfertilized grain yield across both locations ranged from about 1 to 3.5 Mg ha−1 (typical of farmers’ yields in the region), and fertilizing increased grain yields in most situations. Within the two alternative fertilization treatments, WatNitMED fertilization produced higher yields than the fertilization rate considered optimal by farmers. This trend was observed at the low-yielding location as well as at the high-yielding location. These responses demonstrated that fertilization in working farmers’ field conditions may be a reliable means of improving dryland wheat grain and straw yields. They also showed that rates of fertilization regarded as optimal by real farmers were below the optimum for these regions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 459 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abeledo, L. G., Savin, R. and Slafer, G. A. (2008). Wheat productivity in the Mediterranean Ebro Valley: Analyzing the gap between attainable and potential yield with a simulation model. European Journal of Agronomy 28:541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acevedo, H. E., Silva, P. C., Silva, H. R. and Solar, B. R. (1999).Wheat production under Mediterranean environments. In Wheat: Ecology and Physiology of Yield Determination, 503 (Eds Satorre, E. H. and Slafer, G. A.). New York: Haworth Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Acreche, M. M. and Slafer, G. A. (2009). Grain weight, radiation interception and use efficiency as affected by sink-strength in Mediterranean wheats released from 1940 to 2005. Field Crops Research 110:98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrizio, R., Todorovic, M., Matic, T. and Stellacci, A. M. (2010). Comparing the interactive effects of water and nitrogen on durum wheat and barley grown in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research 115:179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W. K. (1985a). Grain yield responses of barley and durum wheat to split nitrogen applications under rainfed conditions in a mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research 12:191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W. K. (1985b). Differences in response of winter cereal varieties to applied nitrogen in the field II. Some factors associated with differences in response. Field Crops Research 11:369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W. K. (1985c). Differences in response of winter cereal varieties to applied nitrogen in the field. I. Some factors affecting the variability of responses between sites and seasons. Field Crops Research 11:353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angus, J. F. (2001). Nitrogen supply and demand in Australian agricultrure Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41:277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acreche, M. M. and Slafer, G. A. (2006). Grain weight response to increases in number of grains in wheat in a Mediterranean area. Field Crops Research 98: 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J. A. and Sperling, L. (1995). Institutionalizing participatory, client-driven research and technology development in agriculture. Development and Change 26: 753–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asseng, S., Keating, B. A., Fillery, I. R. P., Gregory, P. J., Borden, J. W., Turner, N. C., Palta, J. A. and Abrecht, D. G. (1998). Performance of the APSIM-wheat model in Western Australia. Field Crops Research 57: 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asseng, S., Milroy, S. P. and Poole, M. L. (2008). Systems analysis of wheat production on low water-holding soils in a Mediterranean-type environment I. Yield potential and quality. Field Crops Research 105:97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asseng, S. and van Herwaarden, A. F. (2003). Analysis of the benefits to wheat yield from assimilates stored prior to grain filling in a range of environments. Plant and Soil 256:217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baethgen, W. E., Christianson, C. B. and Lamothe, A. G. (1995). Nitrogen-fertilizer effects on growth, grain-yield, and yield components of malting barley. Field Crops Research 43: 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrás, L., Slafer, G. A. and Otegui, M. E. (2004). Seed dry weight response to source–sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal. Field Crops Research 86: 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Albrizio, R., Araus, J. L. and Nogués, S. (2009). Photosynthetic capacity of field-grown durum wheat under different N availabilities: A comparative study from leaf to canopy. Environmental and Experimental Botany 67: 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartelle, J., Pedró, A., Savin, R. and Slafer, G. A. (2006). Grain weight responses to post-anthesis spikelet-trimming in an old and a modern wheat under Mediterranean conditions. European Journal of Agronomy 25:365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
César de Carvalho, P. M. (2009) Optimising root growth to improve uptake and utilization of water and nitrogen in wheat and barley. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Cooper, P. J. M., Gregory, P. J., Tully, D. and Harris, H. C. (1987a). Improving water use efficiency of annual crops in the rainfed farming systems of West Asia and North Africa. Experimental Agriculture 23:113–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, P. J. M., Gregory, P. J., Keatinge, J. D. H. and Brown, S. C. (1987b). Effects of fertilizer, variety and location on barley production under rainfed conditions in Northern Syria 2. Soil water dynamics and crop water use. Field Crops Research 16:67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossani, C. M., Savin, R. and Slafer, G. A. (2007a).Wheat and barley yield in relation with nitrogen and water use efficiencies under Mediterranean environments. In 15th Nitrogen Workshop: Towards a better efficiency in N use, 531 (Eds Bosch, A. D., Teira, M. R. and Villar, J. M.). Lleida, Spain: Departament de Medi Ambient i Ciències del Sòl. Universitat de Lleida. Editorial Milenio.Google Scholar
Cossani, C. M., Savin, R. and Slafer, G. A. (2007b). Contrasting performance of barley and wheat in a wide range of conditions in Mediterranean Catalonia (Spain). Annals of Applied Biology 151:167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossani, C. M., Slafer, G. A. and Savin, R. (2009). Yield and biomass in wheat and barley under a range of conditions in a Mediterranean site. Field Crops Research 112:205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrante, A., Savin, R. and Slafer, G. A. (2010). Floret development of durum wheat in response to nitrogen availability. Journal of Experimental Botany 61:4351–4359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, R. and Schultz, J. (1984a). Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. I. The relation between yield, water use and climate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35:743–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, R. J. and Schultz, J. E. (1984b). Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. II. Some limitations to efficiency. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35:765–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garabet, S., Wood, M. and Ryan, J. (1998). Nitrogen and water effects on wheat yield in a Mediterranean-type climate: I. Growth, water-use and nitrogen accumulation. Field Crops Research 57:309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmsen, K. (1984). Nitrogen fertilizer use in rainfed agriculture. Fertilizer Research 5:371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heng, L. K., Asseng, S., Mejahed, K. and Rusan, M. (2007). Optimizing wheat productivity in two rain-fed environments of the West Asia–North Africa region using a simulation model. European Journal of Agronomy 26:121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keatinge, J. D. H., Neate, P. J. H. and Shepherd, K. D. (1985). The role of fertilizer management in the development and expression of crop drought stress in cereals under Mediterranean environmental conditions. Experimental Agriculture 21:209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, E. (1981). Efficacité de la fumure azotée: Régime de l'azote et fertilité latente des sols conduits en sec ou à l'aspersion dans la Haute vallée semi-aride e la Medjerda en Tunisie. Annales de l'Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique de Tunisie, 252.Google Scholar
Latiri, K. (2005). Les céréales en Tunisie. In Les defies de la Terre. L'agriculture en Espagne et en Tunisie face aux défis de la libéralisation. Analyse comparée, 259–279 (Eds Ceña, F., Gallardo, R., Elloumi, M. and Sai, M. E.). Tunis: IRESA, Cérès Editions.Google Scholar
López-Bellido, L. (1992). Mediterranean cropping systems In Ecosystems of the World, 311–356 (Ed Pearson, C. J..). Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Loss, S. P. and Siddique, K. H. M. (1994). Morphological and physiological traits associated with wheat yield increases in Mediterranean Environments. Advances in Agronomy 52:229–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miralles, D. J. and Slafer, G. A. (1995). Individual grain weight responses to genetic reduction in culm length in wheat as affected by source-sink manipulations. Field Crops Research 43:55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossedaq, F. and Smith, D. H. (1994). Timing nitrogen application to enhance spring wheat yields in a Mediterranean climate. Agronomy Journal 86:221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oweis, T., Pala, M. and Ryan, J. (1998). Stabilizing rainfed wheat yields with supplemental irrigation and nitrogen in a Mediterranean climate. Agronomy Journal 90:672–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oweis, T., Pala, M. and Ryan, J. (1999). Management alternatives for improved durum wheat production under supplemental irrigation in Syria. European Journal of Agronomy 11:255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pala, M., Stockle, C. O. and Harris, H. C. (1996). Simulation of durum wheat (Triticum turgirtum ssp. durum) growth under different water and nitrogen regimes in a Mediterranean environment using CropSyst. Agricultural Systems 51:147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palta, J. A. and Fillery, I. R. P. (1995). N application increases pre-anthesis contribution of dry matter to grain yield in wheat grown on a duplex soil. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46:507–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passioura, J. B. (2002). Environmental biology and crop improvement. Functional Plant Biology 29:537–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Passioura, J. B. (2006). Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce – from breeding to field management. Agricultural Water Management 80:176–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passioura, J. B. and Angus, J. F. (2010). Improving productivity of crops in water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 106:37–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilbeam, C. J., Wood, M., Harris, H. C. and Tuladhar, J. (1998). Productivity and nitrogen use of three different wheat-based rotations in North West Syria. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49: 451–458.Google Scholar
Prystupa, P., Slafer, G. A. and Savin, R. (2003). Leaf appearance, tillering and their coordination in response to NxP fertilization in barley. Plant and Soil 255:587–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, J. (2000). Soil and plant analysis in the Mediterranean region: limitations and potential. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 31: 2147–2154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, J. (2008). A perspective on balanced fertilization in the Mediterranean region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 32: 79–89.Google Scholar
Ryan, J., Abdel Monem, M., Shroyer, J. P., El Bouhssini, M. and Nachit, M. M. (1998). Potential for nitrogen fertilization and Hessian fly-resistance to improve Morocco's dryland wheat yields. European Journal of Agronomy 8:153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, J., Ibrikci, H., Sommer, R. and McNeill, A. (2009). Nitrogen in rainfed and irrigated cropping systems in the Mediterranean region. Advances in Agronomy 104: 53–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadras, V., Roget, D. and Krause, M. (2003). Dynamic cropping strategies for risk management in dry-land farming systems. Agricultural Systems 76: 929–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadras, V. O. (2002). Interaction between rainfall and nitrogen fertilisation of wheat in environments prone to terminal drought: economic and environmental risk analysis. Field Crops Research 77:201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slafer, G. A. and Savin, R. (1994). Source-sink relationships and grain mass at different positions within the spike in wheat. Field Crops Research 37:39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thabet, C., Chebil, A. and Elouaer, H. (2006). Valuing water and nitrogen: Case of Tunisian cereals. In Séminaire Méditerranéen sur les Céréales Irriguées (SMCI), le Kef, Tunisia.Google Scholar
van Herwaarden, A. F., Angus, J. F., Richards, R. A. and Farquhar, G. D. (1998). ‘Haying-off’ the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertilizer. I. Biomass, grain yield and water use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49:1067–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yankovitch, L. (1956). Resultats de 22 années d'expériences dans les case lysimétriques et cases de végetation du service botanique et agronomique de Tunisie. Annales du Service Botanique et Agronomique de Tunisie 29:1–223.Google Scholar