Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:03:31.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of the Dry Bean Model BEANGRO V1.01 for Crop Production Research in a Tropical Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

J. W. White ,
G. Hoogenboom ,
J. W. Jones  and
K. J. Boote
J. W. White
Affiliation:
Bean Physiology, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Apartado Aereo 6713, Cali, Colombia
G. Hoogenboom
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, The University of Georgia, Georgia Station, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
J. W. Jones
Affiliation:
Agricultural Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
K. J. Boote
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Microcomputer-based simulation models are increasingly being recommended as multipurpose tools for agricultural research. Use of a model should be conditioned by an evaluation of its performance and understanding of its limitations. This paper evaluates the responses of the process-oriented growth model for dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), BEANGRO V1.01, with an emphasis on the factors related to cultivar differences for production in tropical environments. Simulations of seed yield from beans grown under conditions of a known water deficit showed good agreement with observed data. The qualitative response to plant population resembled that of a field trial, and the model showed the expected linear relation between days to maturity and seed yield. Overall, the results suggest that BEANGRO has utility for certain types of agronomic studies, but that improvements are possible, particularly with respect to prediction of phenology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 241 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dent, J. B. & Blackie, M. J. (1979). Systems Simulation in Agriculture. London: Applied Science Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. R., Thornton, P. K. & Dent, J. B. (1990). The IBSNAT project and agricultural experimentation in developing countries. Experimental Agriculture 26:369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoogenboom, G. & Thornton, P. K. (1990). A geographic information system for agrotechnology transfer applications in Guatemala. In Proceedings Application of Geographic Information Systems, Simulation Models, and Knowledge-based Systems for Lande Management, November 12–14 1990, 61–70. Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
Hoogenboom, G., Jones, J. W. & White, J. W. (1988). Use of models in studies of drought stress. In Research on Drought Tolerance in Common Bean, 192–230 (Eds White, J. W., Hoogenboom, G., Ibarra, F. and Singh, S. P.). Cali, Colombia: CIAT.Google Scholar
Hoogenboom, C., Jones, J. W. & Boote, K. J. (1992). Modeling growth, development and yield of grain legumes using SOYGRO, PNUTGRO, and BEANGRO: A review. Transactions of the ASAE 35:2043–2056.Google Scholar
Hoogenboom, G., White, J. W., Jones, J. W. & Boote, K. J. (1991). BEANGRO Vl.01 dry bean growth simulation model. User's Guide. Florida Agricultural Experimental Station journal No. N-00379. Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida.Google Scholar
Hoogenboom, G., White, J. W., Jones, J. W. & Boote, K. J. (1994). BEANGRO: A process-oriented dry bean model with a versatile user interface. Agronomy Journal 86:182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBSNAT (1988). Technical Report l. Experimental Design and Data Collection Procedures for IBSNAT. The Minimum Data Sets for Systems Analysis and Crop Simulation, Third Edition. Honolulu, Hawaii: Department of Agronomy and Soil Sciences, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
IBSNAT (1989) Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer Version 2.1 (DSSAT V2.1). Honolulu, Hawaii: Department of Agronomy and Soil Sciences, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
IBSNAT (1990). Technical Report 5. Documentation for IBSNAT Crop Model Input and Output Files, Version 1.1. Honolulu, Hawaii: Department of Agronomy and Soil Sciences, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Jones, J. W. (1993). Decision support systems for agricultural development. In System Approaches for Agricultural Development, 459–471 (Eds Penning de Vries, F. W. T., Teng, P. and Metselaar, K.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Laing, D. R., Kretchmer, P. J., Zuluaga, S. & Jones, P. G. (1983). Physiological studies on yield and adaptation in Phaseolus vulgaris L. In Potential Productivity of Field Crops under Different Environments, 227–248 (Ed. Yoshida, S.). Los Baños, Philippines, IRRI.Google Scholar
Lai, H., Hoogenboom, G., Calixte, J.-P., Jones, J. W. & Beinroth, F. H. (1993). Using crop simulation models and GIS for regional productivity analysis. Transactions of the ASAE 36: 175–184.Google Scholar
Penning de Vries, F. W. T., Teng, P. & Metselaar, K. (eds) (1993). System Approaches for Agricultural Development. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning de Vries, F. W. T., Jansen, D. M., ten Berge, H. F. & Bakema, A. (1989). Simulation of Ecophysiological Processes of Growth in Several Annual Crops. Simulation Monographs. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Schoonhoven, A. V. & Pastor-Corrales, M. A. (1987). Standard System for the Evaluation of Bean Germplasm. Cali, Colombia: CIAT.Google Scholar
Shorter, R., Lawn, R. J. & Hammer, G. L. (1991). Improving genotypic adaptation in crops-a role for breeders, physiologists and modellers. Experimental Agriculture 27:155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P. K., Dent, J. B. & Bacsi, Z. (1991). A framework for crop growth simulation model applications. Agricultural Systems 37:327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J. W., Castillo, J. A. & Ehleringer, J. (1990). Associations between productivity, root growth and carbon isotope discrimination in Phaseolus vulgaris under water deficit. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 17:189–198.Google Scholar
White, J. W. & Laing, D. R. (1989). Photoperiod response of flowering in diverse genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Field Crops Research 22:113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J. W. & Molano, C. H. (1994). Production of common bean under saturated soil culture. Field Crops Research 36:53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J. W. & Singh, S. P. (1991). Sources and inheritance of earliness in tropically adapted indeterminate common bean. Euphytica 55:15–19.Google Scholar