Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:55:18.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Historical Reflections on Progress and Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2014

R.C. Van Caenegem*
Affiliation:
Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid, Instituut voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, Vakgroep Grondslagen en Geschiedenis van het Recht, Universiteitstraat 4, 9000 Gent, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Reflecting on the tension between progressives and traditionalists in present-day Egypt, the author surveys comparable conflicts in the European past. In nineteenth-century Britain and Belgium the struggle between liberals and conservatives dominated public life. In eighteenth-century France the progressive forces of the Enlightenment were for a long time in bitter conflict with the traditional defenders of King and Church, until the latter were defeated in the French Revolution. In seventeenth-century England the Puritan Revolution overthrew Stuart absolutism, which was a democratic move, but Cromwell then established his own fundamentalist Republic, which was illiberal. In the sixteenth century Humanists and Protestants were progressive and broke with medieval modes of thought and papal domination, but were opposed by traditional forces around the House of Habsburg and the Counter-reformation, neither party claiming total victory. By the fifteenth century the progressive conciliar movement attempted to democratize the Catholic Church by putting the papal curia under the supreme authority of the general council, an assembly representing Christian people of all nations. This short-lived attempt was foiled by defenders of the traditional papal supremacy.

Type
European History and Society
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

1.Raina, P. (2011) House of Lords Reform: A History. Book One, The Origins to 1911 (Oxford: Peter Lang).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. This kingdom was an amalgam of the Austrian Netherlands and the Dutch Republic, created by the Congress of Vienna in 1815, and harking back to the sixteenth-century Habsburg Netherlands. King William was a descendant of William the Silent and the stadtholders of Holland.Google Scholar
3. See the brilliant analysis in Rutherford, B. K. (2013) Egypt after Mubarak. Liberalism, Islam, and Democracy in the Arab World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
4. The full title was Syllabus complectens praecipuos nostrae aetatis errores, i.e. A catalogue containing the main errors of our time.Google Scholar
5. The Latin solutus or absolutus means ‘free from, not bound by’, so absolute kings were above the law. The notion goes back to the Roman law phrase Princeps legibus solutus est, the emperor is not bound by the laws.Google Scholar
6. Law French was the technical language of the ‘common-law courts’, going back to the Norman occupation, and completely incomprehensible to ordinary people.Google Scholar
7.Setz, W. (1975) Lorenzo Vallas Schrift gegen die Konstantinische Sehensung (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag).Google Scholar
8.Lhotsky, A. (1957) Privilegium maius. Die Geschichte einer Urkunde (Munich and Vienna: Oldenbourg).Google Scholar
9. In the ascending theory of government, original power is anchored in the people, in the descending thesis original power is located in a supreme being: God distributing the laws to mankind through the medium of kings (Ullmann, W. (1965) A History of Political Thought: the Middle Ages (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books), pp. 1213).Google Scholar
10. Gregory XII succeeded Innocent VII in 1406 in Rome. At the council of Constance he resigned in 1415 and died in 1417.Google Scholar
11. The bibliography on the subject is extensive. The reader can consult the classic study by Tierney, B. (1968) Foundations of the Conciliar Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). See also a recent work by M. Decaluwe (2009) A Successful Defeat. The Papal Politics of Pope Eugene IV Towards the Council of Basel (Brussels, Rome: Brepols International Academic Publishers) (Bibliotheek van het Belgisch Historisch Instituut te Rome, LIX).Google Scholar

Further Reading

Feine, H. E. (1972) Kirchliche Rechtsgeschichte. Die Katholische Kirche, 5th edn (Cologne, Graz: Böhlau Verlag).Google Scholar
Hill, C. (1975) Change and Continuity in Seventeenth-century England (London: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Lesaffer, R. C. H. (2009) European Legal History: A Cultural and Political Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padoa Schioppa, A. (2007) Storia del diritto in Europa. Dal medioevo all’ età contemporanea (Bologna: Società editrice il Mulino).Google Scholar
Soboul, A. (1962) La Révolution française. I: De la Bastille à la Gironde. II: De la Montagne à Brumaire (Paris: Gallimard).Google Scholar
van Caenegem, R. C. (1995) An Historical Introduction to Western Constitutional History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar