Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:53:52.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European Values – and Others. Europe’s Shared Values: Towards an ever-closer Union?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

Göran Hermerén
Göran Hermerén*
Affiliation:
BMC (Biomedical Centre) C 13, SE-221 84 Lund, Sweden
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is (a) to point out some difficulties in the notion of European values, (b) nevertheless to present some ideas on what might be at least part of specific European traditions in bioethics, and (c) to outline a conceptual framework for further conceptual and empirical studies in this area. In European declarations and conventions, a number of important values are enshrined, including human dignity, integrity, freedoms, autonomy, health, safety and security, justice, prosperity, equity and equality, as well as solidarity. Since almost all of these values are also referred to in many other declarations, the notion of European values is problematic. Moreover, Europe is becoming increasingly multicultural due to immigration. If there is a particular European approach to ethics, based on European values, two possibilities suggest themselves. First, although the same terms referring to basic values also appear in, for instance, various UN declarations, these terms are interpreted in a particular way in Europe. Secondly, the difference lies in the ranking order between the values. In this paper, the second of these possibilities is explored. However, the notion of a ranking order can be interpreted in several ways, which are also discussed in the paper. The paper concludes with some remarks on the necessity of a global dialogue on ethical issues.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Review , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 373 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Hermerén, G. (2007) Challenges in the evaluation of nano scale research: ethical aspects. NanoEthics November.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Hymers, J. (2007) Introduction. Ethical Perspectives, 1, 2–3.Google Scholar
3.Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J. (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
4.Holm, S. (1995) Not just autonomy – the principles of American biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 21(6), 332–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Hermerén, G. (2006) European values, ethics and law. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik, 11, 5–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Gewirth, A. (1978) Reason and Morality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
7.Gewirth, A. (1996) The Community of Rights (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
8.Beyleveld, D. and Brownsword, R. (2002) Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
9.Fleischhauer, K. and Hermerén, G. (2007) Goals of Medicine in the Course of History and Today (Stockholm: A&W International).Google Scholar
10.Gibbon, E. (1993) The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (New York: Everyman’s Library).Google Scholar
11.Ferguson, N. (2004) Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
12.Norwich, J. (1955) Byzantium: The Decline and Fall (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar
13.Palmer, A. (1992) The Decline and Fall of the Ottoman Empire (London: John Murray).Google Scholar
14.Sked, A. (1989) The Decline and Fall of the Hapsburg Empire 1815–1918 (London: Longman).Google Scholar
15.James, L. (1994) The Rise and Fall of the British Empire (London: Little, Brown & Co).Google Scholar
16.Bentham, J. (1996) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (Oxford: Clarendon).Google Scholar
17.Singer, P. (1993) Practical Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
18.Hare, R. (1981) Moral Thinking (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Parfit, D. (1984) Reasons and Persons (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
20.Apel, K.-O. (1976) Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
21.Apel, K.-O. (1998) From a Transcendental-Semiotic Point of View (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
22.Habermas, J. (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
23.Habermas, J. (1993) Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics (London: Polity).Google Scholar
24.Mitchell, W. J. T. (1984) The Politics of Interpretation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
25.Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.O’Neill, O. (1996) Towards Justice and Virtue. A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar