Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:43:12.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Infants Know and What They have to Learn about Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Jacques Mehler ,
Marina Nespor  and
Marcela Peña
Jacques Mehler*
Affiliation:
International School for Advanced Science, Trieste, Italy and Emeritus CNRS, France
Marina Nespor
Affiliation:
University of Milan, Bicocca and Interdisciplinary Center, Accademia dei Lincei, Italy
Marcela Peña
Affiliation:
Universidad de, Chile and International School for Advanced Science, Trieste, Italy
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study of language acquisition during the first year of life is reviewed. We identified three areas that have contributed to our understanding of how the infant copes with linguistic signals to attain the most basic properties of its native language. Distributional properties present in the incoming utterances may allow infants to extract word candidates in the speech stream as shown in the impoverished conditions of artificial grammar studies. This procedure is important because it would work well for most natural languages. We also highlight another important mechanism that allows infants to induce structure from very scarce data. In fact, humans tend to project structural conjectures after being presented with only a few utterances. Finally, we illustrate constraints on processing that derive from perceptual and memory functions that arose much earlier during the evolutionary history of the species. We conclude that all of these machanisms are important for the infants to gain access to its native language.

Type
Focus: The Origin of Language
Information
European Review , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 429 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structure (The Hague/Paris: Mouton).Google Scholar
2.Lenneberg, E. (1967) Biological Foundations of Language (New York: John Wiley & Sons).Google Scholar
3.Mowrer, O. H. (1960) Learning Theory and the Symbolic Processes (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
4.Chomsky, N. (1959) Review of Verbal Behavior by B. F. Skinner. Language, 35, 26–58.Google Scholar
5.Gould, J. L. and Marler, P. (1987) Learning by instinct. Scientific American, 62.Google Scholar
6.Gardner, T. J., Naef, F. and F. Nottebohm (2005) Freedom and rules: the acquisition and reprogramming of a bird’s learned song. Science, 308(5724), 1046–1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. N. Tinbergen (1951) The Study of Instinct (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
8.Lorenz, K. (1958) The evolution of behavior. Scientific American, 119, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Voltaire (1979) Romans et contes, Micromegas, VII, pg 35, Gallimard, Ed Pleiade (Paris).Google Scholar
10.Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
11.Chomsky, N. (1980) Rules and Representations (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
12.Rizzi, L. (1986) Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 501–557.Google Scholar
13.Chomsky, N. (2008) The China Lectures (In press).Google Scholar
14.Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., F. Lacerda, K. N. Stevens and B. Lindblom (1992) Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255(5044), 606–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Werker, J. F. and Tees, R. C. (1984) Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Jusczyk, P. W. (1997) The Discovery of Spoken Language Recognition (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
17.Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P., G. Lambertz, N. Halsted, J. Bertoncini and C. Amiel-Tison (1988) A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29, 143–178.Google Scholar
18.Morgan, J. L. (1996) A rhythmic bias in preverbal speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 666–688.Google Scholar
19.Wanner, E. and Gleitman, L. R. (1982) Language Aquisition: the State of the Art (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
20.Morgan, J. L. and Demuth, K. (1996) Signal to syntax: an overview. In: Morgan, J. L., Demuth, K. (eds) Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
21. M. Nespor (1995) Setting syntactic parameters at a prelexical stage. Proceedings of the XXV ABRALIN Conference, Salvador de Bahia.Google Scholar
22.Nespor, M., Guasti, M. T. and A. Christophe (1996) Selecting word order: the Rhythmic Activation Principle. Interfaces in Phonology (U. Kleinhenz, Berlin: Akademie Verlag), pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
23.Cutler, A. and Mehler, J. (1993) The periodicity bias. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Zipf, G. K. (1936) The Psycho-biology of language (London: George Routledge).Google Scholar
25.Miller, G. A. (1951) Language and Communication (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Hayes, J. R. and Clark, H. H. (1970) Experiments on the segmentation of an artificial speech analogue. Cognition and the Development of Language (New York: Wiley), pp. 221–234.Google Scholar
27.Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N. et al. (1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Gervain, J., Nespor, M., R. Mazuka, R. Horie and J. Mehler (2008) Bootstrapping word order in prelexical infants: a Japanese-Italian cross-linguistic study. Cognitive Psychology.Google Scholar
29.Shukla, M., Nespor, M. and J. Mehler (2007) An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 54(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Bates, E. and Elman, J. (1996) Learning rediscovered. Science, 274 (13 December), 1849–1850.Google Scholar
31.Hauser, M. D., Newport, E. L. and R. N. Aslin (2001) Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins. Cognition, 78(3), B53–B64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Peña, M., Bonatti, L. L., M. Nespor and J. Mehler (2002) Signal-driven computations in speech processing. Science, 298(5593), 604–607.Google Scholar
33.Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., S. Bandi Rao and P. M. Vishton (1999) Rule-learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Endress, A. D., Scholl, B. J. and J. Mehler (2005) The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(3), 406–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Chomsky, N. (1988) Language and Problems of Knowledge (Cambridge: MIT Press).Google Scholar
36. J. A. Fodor (1983) The Modularity of Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
37. J. Gervain, F. Macagno, S. Cogoi, M. Peña and J. Mehler (In press). The neonate brain detects speech structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.Google Scholar
38.Burgess, N. and Hitch, G. (2005) Computational models of working memory: putting long-term memory into context. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(11), 535–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Endress, A. D. and Bonatti, L. L. (2007) Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream. Cognition, 105(2), 247–299.Google Scholar
40. M. Nespor, M. Shukla, R. van de Vijver, C. Avesani, H. Schraudolf and C. Donati (Under revision) Different phrasal prominence realization in VO and OV languages.Google Scholar
41.Bolton, T. L. (1894) Rhythm. American Journal of Psychology, 6, 145–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Woodrow, H. (1951) Time perception. In: Stevens, S. S. (ed.) Handbook of Experimental Psychology (New York: Wiley), pp. 1224–1236.Google Scholar
43.Hayes, B. (1995) Metrical Stress Theory (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
44. R. H. Bion, M. Peña, A. Langus and M. Nespor (Submitted) Markers of prominence influence memory for auditory and visual sequences.Google Scholar
45.Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. et al. (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569–1579.Google Scholar
46.Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
47. S. Pinker (1997) How the Mind Works (Allen Lane: WW Norton).Google Scholar
48.Pinker, S. and Jackendoff, R. (2005) The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition, 95(2), 201–236.Google Scholar