Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:24:13.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Twardowski on Presentations and Truth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2015

Katarzyna Kijania-Placek
Katarzyna Kijania-Placek*
Affiliation:
Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is concerned with Twardowski’s role as a teacher and a founder of the Lvov-Warsaw School of logic and philosophy as well as with his main contributions to philosophy: the distinction between the content and object of presentations and his defense of objective truth, which initiated a debate on the eternity of truth in the School. It would perhaps be no exaggeration to say that the emergence of the Lvov-Warsaw School was the result of the premeditated efforts of one philosopher, namely Kazimierz Twardowski. Therefore, I will first present Twardowski’s role as a teacher and founder of the School and then move on to his theoretical achievements.

Type
Focus: Logic and Philosophy in Poland
Information
European Review , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 105 - 113
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Twardowski, K. (1926/1991) Kazimierz Twardowski: Selbstdarstellung. In: J. Woleński and T. Binder (eds), Grazer Philosophische Studien, 39, 1991, pp. 1–24. English translation in: K. Twardowski (1999) On Actions, Products and Other Topics in Philosophy, edited by J. Brandl and J. Woleński (Amsterdam: Rodopi), pp. 17–31.Google Scholar
2.Woleński, J. (1989) Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic).Google Scholar
3.Betti, A. (2011) Kazimierz Twardowski. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2011 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/twardowski/.Google Scholar
4.Czeżowski, T. (1938) Kazimierz Twardowski jako nauczyciel [Kazimierz Twardowski as a teacher]. In: Kazimierz Twardowski. Nauczyciel-Uczony-Obywatel [Kazimierz Twardowski. Teacher-Scholar-Citizen] (Lvov: Nakładem Polskiego Towarzystwa Filozoficznego), pp. 7–12. English translation as ‘Kazimierz Twardowski as a teacher’, Studia Philosophica 1939–1946 (III), 1948, pp. 11–17.Google Scholar
5.Jordan, Z. (1967) The development of mathematical logic in Poland between the two wars. In: S. McCall (ed.), Polish Logic 1920–1939 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 346–397.Google Scholar
6.Łempicki, S. (1938) Rola Kazimierza Twardowskiego w uniwersytecie i w społeczeństwie [The role of Kazimierz Twardowski at the university and in the society]. In: Kazimierz Twardowski. Nauczyciel-Uczony-Obywatel [Kazimierz Twardowski. Teacher-Scholar-Citizen] (Lvov: Nakładem Polskiego Towarzystwa Filozoficznego), pp. 31–49.Google Scholar
7.Ingarden, R. (1938) Działalność naukowa Twardowskiego. In: Kazimierz Twardowski. Nauczyciel-Uczony-Obywatel [Kazimierz Twardowski. Teacher-Scholar-Citizen] (Lvov: Nakładem Polskiego Towarzystwa Filozoficznego), pp. 13–30. English translation as ‘The scientific activity of Kazimierz Twardowski’, Studia Philosophica 1939–1946 (III), 1948, pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
8.Dąmbska, I. (1948) Czterdzieści lat filozofii we Lwowie, 1898–1938 [Forty Years of Philosophy in Lvov, 1898–1938]. Przegląd Filozoficzny, 44, pp. 14–25.Google Scholar
9.Woleński, J. (1998) The reception of the Lvov-Warsaw School. In: K. Kijania-Placek and J. Woleński (eds), The Lvov-Warsaw School and Contemporary Philosophy (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic), pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
10.Brentano, F. (1874) Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkte (Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot). English translation as Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, 2nd revised ed. (London: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar
11.Höfler, A. and Meinong, A. (1890) Logik (Vienna: F. Tempsky).Google Scholar
12.Bolzano, B. (1837) Wissenschaftslehre. Versuch einer ausführlichen und grösstentheils neuen Darstellung der Logik mit steter Rücksicht auf deren bisherige Bearbeiter (Sulzbach: J.E. v. Seidel).Google Scholar
13.Zimmermann, R. (1853) Philosophische Propädeutik für Obergymnasien, Zweite Abteilung: Formale Logik (Vienna: Braumüller).Google Scholar
14.Kerry, B. (1885–1891) Über Anschauung und ihre psychische Verarbeitung. Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, IX, 1885, pp. 433–493 (First Article); X, 1886, pp. 419–467 (Second); XI, 1887, pp. 53–116 (Third); XI, 1887, pp. 249–307 (Fourth); XIII, 1889, pp. 1–124 (Fifth), pp. 392–419 (Sixth); XIV, 1890, pp. 317–353 (Seventh); XV, 1891, pp. 127–167 (Eighth).Google Scholar
15.Stout (1894). Review of K. Twardowski’s Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen. Eine psychologische Untersuchung. Mind, 3(10), pp. 274–275.Google Scholar
16.van der Schaar, M. (1996) From analytic psychology to analytic philosophy: The reception of Twardowski’s ideas in Cambridge. Axiomathes, 7(3), pp. 295–324.Google Scholar
17.van der Schaar, M. (2013) G.F. Stout and the Psychological Origins of Analytic Philosophy (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
18.Twardowski, K. (1894) Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen—Eine psychologische Untersuchung (Vienna: Hölder). English translation as On the Content and Object of Presentations (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1977).Google Scholar
19.Meinong, A. (1904) Über Gegenstandstheorie. In: J. A. Barth (ed.), Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie [Investigations in Theory of Objects and Psychology] (Leipzig: J.A. Barth), pp. 1–51. English translation as: The theory of objects. In: R. M. Chisholm (ed.), Realism and the Background of Phenomenology (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1960).Google Scholar
20.Husserl, E. (1900–01) Logische Untersuchungen (Halle a.S.: Niemeyer). English translation as Logical Investigations (London: Routledge, 1973).Google Scholar
21.Betti, A. and van der Schaar, M. (2004) The road from Vienna to Lvov. Twardowski’s theory of judgement between 1894 and 1897. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 67, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
22.Russell, B. (1905) On denoting. Mind, 14, pp. 479–493.Google Scholar
23.Meinong, A. (1915) Über Möglichkeit und Wahrscheinlichkeit. Beiträge zur Gegenstandstheorie und Erkenntnistheorie [On Possibility and Probability. Contributions to Object Theory and Epistemology] (Leipzig: J.A. Barth).Google Scholar
24.Routley, R. (1980) Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond. An Investigation of Noneism and the Theory of Items (Canberra: Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University).Google Scholar
25.Simons, P. (1992) On what there isn’t: the Meinong Russell dispute. In: P. Simons, Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Selected Essays (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 159–191.Google Scholar
26.Paśniczek, J. (1998) The Logic of Intentional Objects. A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic (Dordrecht: Kluwer).Google Scholar
27.Marek, J. (2013) Alexius Meinong. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/meinong/.Google Scholar
28.Twardowski, K. (1900) O tak zwanych prawdach względnych. In: Księga Pamiątkowa Uniwersytetu Lwowskiego ku uczczeniu 500 rocznicy fundacji Jagiellońskiej Uniwersytetu Krakowskiego, 25–37. English translation as ‘On so-called relative truths’ in K. Twardowski (1999) On Actions, Products and Other Topics in Philosophy, edited by J. Brandl and J. Woleński (Amsterdam: Rodopi), 147–170.Google Scholar
29.Woleński, J. and Simons, P. (1989) De Veritate: Austro-Polish contributions to the theory of truth from Brentano to Tarski. In: K. Szaniawski (ed.), The Vienna Circle and the Lvov-Warsaw School (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic), pp. 391–443.Google Scholar
30.Mulligan, K., Kijania-Placek, K. and Placek, T. (2013) The history and philosophy of Polish logic: some basic thoughts. In: K. Mulligan, K. Kijania-Placek and T. Placek (eds), The History and Philosophy of Polish Logic: Essays in Honour of Jan Woleński (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
31.Kijania-Placek, K. (2012) Pochwała okazjonalności. Analiza deskryptywnych użyć wyrażeń okazjonalnych [In Praise of Indexicality. An Analysis of Descriptive Uses of Indexicals] (Warsaw: Semper).Google Scholar
32.Kotarbiński, T. (1913) Zagadnienie istnienia przyszłości. Przegląd Filozoficzny, 16(1), pp. 74–92. English translation as: The problem of the existence of the future. The Polish Review, 13(3), 1968, pp. 7–22.Google Scholar
33.Leśniewski, S. (1913) Czy prawda jest tylko wieczna czy też i wieczna i odwieczna? Nowe Tory, 8, 493–528. English translation as: ‘Is all truth only true eternally or is it also true without a beginning’. In: S. J. Surma et al. (eds), Stanisław Leśniewski. Collected Works (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1991), pp. 86–114.Google Scholar
34.Łukasiewicz, J. (1922 [1961]) O determinizmie. In: L. Borkowski (Ed.), Z zagadnie? logiki i filozofii. Pisma wybrane [Issues in Logic and Philosophy. Selected Works] (Warsaw: PWN), pp. 114–26. English translation as ‘On determinism’ in S. McCall (Ed.), Polish Logic 1920-1939 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967). This work was delivered as a lecture in 1922, but was published in 1961.Google Scholar
35.Łukasiewicz, J. (1910) O zasadzie sprzeczności u Arystotelesa [On the Principle of Contradiction in Aristotle] (Krakow: Polska Akademia Umiejętności).Google Scholar
36.Montague, R. (1970) English as a formal language. In: B. Visentini et al. (eds), Linguaggi nella Societá e nella Tecnica (Milan: Edizioni di Communità), pp. 189–224.Google Scholar
37.Scott, D. (1970) Advice on modal logic. In: K. Lambert (ed.), Philosophical Problems in Logic (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), pp. 143–173.Google Scholar
38.Davidson, D. (1967) Truth and meaning. Synthèse, 17, pp. 304–323.Google Scholar
39.Kaplan, D. (1989) Demonstratives. In: J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds), Themes from Kaplan (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 481–563.Google Scholar