ResultsAccording to the literature, cases had poorer performance in working memory tasks (Digit Span: μ7,72 [ds=2,98] vs μ10,14 [ds=3,10], U=865,00, p=0,00; Digit Symbol: μ5,36 [ds=2,43] vs μ10,05 [ds=3,10], U=455,50, p=0,00; Arithmetic: μ5,46 [ds=2,76] vs μ8,74 [ds=3,24], U=865,50, p=0,00; Block Design: μ4,82 [ds=2,72] vs μ7,60 [ds=3,18], U=912,00, p=0,00), in Beads Task (81,6% vs 51,1%, χ2=10,27, p=0,001, μ2,53 [ds=3,57] vs μ4,23 [ds=4,77], U=1171,00, p=0,006) and in DFAR (total errors: μ21,62 [ds=7,43] vs μ16,58 [ds=8,69], U=554,50, p=0,002). Furthermore working memory tasks in cases group correlated significantly with JTC (Digit Span: r<sub>rho</sub>=0,276, p=0,003; Digit Symbol: r<sub>rho</sub>=0,275, p=0,002; Arithmetic: r<sub>rho</sub>=0,265, p=0,003; Block Design: r<sub>rho</sub>=0,292, p=0,001), but only Digit Span with ER (r<sub>rho</sub>=-0,239; p=0,021). In addition, we found that JTC and ER were significantly associated (r<sub>rho</sub>=-0,281; p=0,004).