Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:32:47.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democracy and Literacy: the role of culture in political life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Ingrid Creppell
Get access

Extract

In the history of democracy, various criteria have been used to determine the size and nature of the electorate. We can, in a general way, divide these criteria into two types which we might label ascribed versus achieved characteristics of the person. Suffrage qualifications based upon age, sex, race and religion would fall under the first category; qualifications determined by education, military and criminal status, and property fall under the second. The distinction draws attention to the implicit notion that some characteristics are acquired by individual choice (‘achieved’) while others are given from the outside simply by nature of an automatic inclusion within certain groups (‘ascribed’). Such a categorization is certainly open to challenge from many angles. The point however is that it provides us with one way to begin understanding the changes which democracy has undergone. Of the ascribed qualities only age remains a legitimate basis for denying suffrage. Variations in suffrage rights based on achieved qualities still exist though there is less reliance on any of these as well. Overall, the development path seems to have run from the use of both types to the use of achieved criteria to using only age as a prerequisite. What are the driving forces of this transformation?

Type
Research Article
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , May 1989 , pp. 22 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected Bibliography

Adamson, Walter L., Hegemony and Revolution (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Austin, Granville, The Indian Constitution: cornerstone of a nation (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Ball, Howard, Krane, Dale and Lauth, Thomas P., Compromised Compliance (Westport, CT, Greenwood Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Banerjee, A. C. (ed.), Indian Constitutional Documents 1757–1947, Volume IV : 1935–1947 (Calcutta, A. Mukherjee & Co., 1965).Google Scholar
Bishop, Cortlandt F., History of Elections in the American Colonies (New York, Burt Franklin, 1968 [first published 1893]).Google Scholar
Brecher, Michael, Nehru, a Political Biography (London, Oxford University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean, The system of 1896: an analysis, in Kleppner, Paul et al. , The Evolution of American Electoral Systems (Westport, CT, Greenwood Press, 1981), pp. 147–202.Google Scholar
Butler, David, Pennimen, Howard R. and Ranney, Austin, Democracy at the Polls (Washington, DC, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1981).Google Scholar
Cremin, Lawrence A., American Education. The national experience 1783–1876 (New york, Harper & Row, 1980).Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray, The Symbolic Uses of Politics (Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Field, John Osgood, Consolidating Democracy (New Delhi, Manohar, 1980).Google Scholar
Finley, M. I., Democracy Ancient and Modern (New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Fisher, Margaret W. (ed.), The Indian Experience with Democratic Elections [Indian Press Digests: Monograph Series, No. 3, 12, 1956] (Berkeley, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures (New York, Basic Books, 1973).Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest, Culture, Identity, and Politics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Godelier, Maurice, The ideal in the real, in Samuel, Raphael and Jones, Gareth Stedman (eds.), Culture, Ideology and Politics (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982).Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio, Prison Notebooks. Edited and tr. by Hoare, Quintin and Smith, Geoffrey Nowell (New York, International Publishers, 1971).Google Scholar
SirGwyer, Maurice and Appadorai, A. (eds.), Speeches and Documents on the Indian Constitution, 1921–47, Volumes I and II (Bombay, Oxford University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Handlin, Oscar, Boston's Immigrants (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Hardgrave, Robert L. Jr., India (New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980).Google Scholar
Higham, John, Strangers in the Land (New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 1955).Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob, Recent theories of the capitalist state, Cambridge Journal of Economics, I (1977), 353–373.Google Scholar
Kaestle, Carl F., Pillars of the Republic (New York, Hill & Wang, 1983).Google Scholar
Kleppner, Paul, The Third Electoral System, 1853–1892 (Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Kozol, Jonathan, Illiterate America (New York, New American Library, 1985).Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., Approaches to the state: alternative conceptions and historical dynamics, Comparative Politics (01 1984), 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Steven F., Black Ballots: voting rights in the South, 1944–1969 (New York, Columbia University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Lockridge, Kenneth A., Literacy in Colonial New England (New York, W. W. Norton & Co., 1974).Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olson, Johan P., The New Institutionalism: organizational factors in political life, American Political Science Review, LXXVIII (1984), 734–750.Google Scholar
McKinley, Albert Edward, The Suffrage Franchise in the Thirteen English Colonies in America (New York, Burt Franklin, 1969 [first published 1905]).Google Scholar
Miller, Kerby A., Emigrants and Exiles (New York, Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Misra, B. B., The Indian Political Parties (Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Morris-Jones, W. H., Parliament in India (Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Porter, Kirk H., A History of Suffrage in the United States (New York, Greenwood Press, 1969 [first published 1918]).Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Material bases of consent: economics and politics in a hegemonic system, Political Power and Social Theory, I (1980), 21–66.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Capitalism and Social Democracy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Pylee, M. V., Constitutional Government in India (New York, Asia Publishing House, 1960).Google Scholar
Reitman, Alan and Davidson, Robert B., The Election Process: voting laws and Procedures (New York, Oceana Publications, 1972).Google Scholar
Roy, M. N., National Government or People's Government? (Bombay, Renaissance Publishers, 1946).Google Scholar
Seymour, Charles, How the World Votes, Volumes I and II (Springfield, MA, C. A. Nichols Co., 1918).Google Scholar
Smith, Constance E., Voting and Election Laws (New York, Oceana Publications, 1960).Google Scholar
Soltow, Lee and Stevens, Edward, The Rise of Literacy and the Common School in the United States (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Spear, Percival, A History of India, Volume II (New York, Penguin Books, 1970).Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence, Literacy and education in England, 1640–1900, Past and Present, XLII (02 1969), 69–139.Google Scholar
Supple, Barry, The state and the industrial revolution 1700–1914, in Cipolla, Carlo M. (ed.), The Industrial Revolution 1700–1914, Volume III [The Fontana Economic History of Europe] (London, Collins-Fontana Books, 1973), pp. 301–357.Google Scholar
Welter, Rush (ed.), American Writings on Popular Education (Indianapolis, The Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1971).Google Scholar
West, E. G., Literacy and the industrial revolution, The Economic History Review, Second Series, XXXI (1978), 3, 369–383.Google Scholar
Williamson, Chilton, American Suffrage From Property to Democracy, 1760–1860 (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1960).Google Scholar