(1) Joelson, Mark R., Legal Problems in the Dismissal of Civil Servants in the U.S., Britain and France, American Journal of Comparative Law, XII (1963), 147–171.Google Scholar

(2) Wigmore, John Henry, A Panorama of the World's Legal Systems (St. Paul, Minnesota, West Publishing Company, 1928), 3 vols.Google Scholar

(3) David, René, Les grands systèmes de droit contemporains (Paris, Dalloz, 1964).Google Scholar

(4) Kahn-Freund, O., Comparative Law as an Academic Subject, Law Quarterly Review, LXXXII (1966), p. 40.Google Scholar

(5) Hoebel, E. Adamson, The Law of Primitive Man (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1954).Google Scholar

(6) Rose, Arnold M., Theory and Method in the Social Sciences (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1954), pp. 72–115Google Scholar; On Individualism and Social Responsibility, European Journal of Sociology II (1961), 163–169.Google Scholar

(7) Rabinowitz, R. W., The Historical Development of the Japanese Bar, Harvard Law Review, LXX (1956), 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(8) Cf. Hall, Jerome, Comparative Law and Social Theory (Louisiana, Louisiana State University Press, 1963), pp. 10–15.Google Scholar

(9) Cf. Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and Menzel, Herbert, On the Relation between Individual and Collective Properities, in Etzioni, Amitai (ed.), Complex Organizations: A Sociological Reader (New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961), pp. 428–429Google Scholar; Retzlaff, Ralph H., The Use of Aggregate Data in Comparative Political Analysis, Journal of Politics, XXVII (1965), pp. 797–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(10) Kahn-Freund, , op. cit. p. 45.Google Scholar

(11) Cf. Evan, William M., Toward a Sociological Almanac of Legal Systems, International Social Science Journal, XVII (1965), 335–338.Google Scholar

(12) Ibid. p. 336.

(13) Bauer, Raymond A. (ed.), Social Indicators (Cambridge, M.I.T. Press, 1966).Google Scholar

(14) Cf. Evan, William M., Due Process of Law in Military and Industrial Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, VII (1962), pp. 203–207.Google Scholar

(15) Cf. Banks, Arthur S. and Textor, Robert B., A Cross-Polity Survey (Cambridge, M.I.T. Press, 1963), pp. 114–115.Google Scholar

(16) Cf. Ancel, Marc, Observations on the International Comparison of Criminal Statistics, International Review of Criminal Policy, I (1952), 41–48Google Scholar; U.N. Economic and Social Council, Report by the Secretariat, Criminal Statistics: Standard Classification of Offenses, E/CN 5/357, 2 03 1959 (Mimeo).Google Scholar

(17) Evan, , Toward a Sociological Almanac of Legal Systems op. cit. pp. 337–338.Google Scholar

(18) Cf. World Peace Through Law Center, Law and Judicial Systems of Nations (Washington, World Peace Through Law Center, 1965).Google Scholar

(19) See, for example, David, , op. cit.Google Scholar

(20) Russett, Bruce M. et al. , World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1964)Google Scholar; Deutsch, Karl W., Lasswell, Harold D., Merritt, Richard L., and Russett, Bruce M., The Yale Political Data ProgramGoogle Scholar, in Merritt, Richard L. and Rokkan, Stein, (eds.), Comparing Nations: The Use of Quantitative Data in Cross-National Research (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1966), pp. 81–94.Google Scholar

(21) See, for example, Matthews, Donald R., The Social Background of Political Decision-Makers (Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday, 1954), pp. 28–32Google Scholar; Gold, David, Lawyers in Politics: An Empirical Exploretion of Biographical Data on State Legislators, Pacific Sociological Review, IV (1961), pp. 84–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(22) Nagel, Stuart S., Culture Patterns and Judicial Systems, Vanderbilt Law Review, XVI (1962), pp. 151–152.Google Scholar

(23) Banks, and Textor, , op. cit.Google Scholar

(24) Cf. Evan, William M., Introduction: Some Approaches to the Sociology of Law, in Evan, William M. (ed.), Law and Sociology: Exploratory Essays (New York, The Free Press of Glencoe, 1962), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar

(25) Kutschinsky, Berl, Law and Education: Some Aspects of Scandinavian Studies into “The General Sense of Justice”, Acta Sociologica, X (1966), 21–41Google Scholar; Makela, Klaus, Public Sense of Justice and Judicial Practice, Acta Sociologica, X (1966), 42–67.Google Scholar

(26) Cf. Glaser, William A., International Mail Surveys of Informants, Human Organization, XXV (1966), 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* Revised version of a paper presented at the Sixth World Congress of Sociology in Evian, France, September 4–11, 1966. I wish to express my gratitude to David Edwards for his invaluable help in processing the data for this paper. I am also indebted to the Wharton School of Finance and Commerce of the University of Pennsylvania and its Management Science Center for making it possible to bring this study to a conclusion.

(27) Cf. Rokkan, Stein, Comparative Cross-National Research: The Context of Currents Efforts;Google ScholarMerrit, and Rokkan, , op. cit. pp. 3–25Google Scholar; Bisco, Ralph L., Social Science Data Archives, American Political Science Review, LX (1966), 93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Glaser, William L. and Bisco, Ralph L., Plans of the Council of Social Science Data Archives, Social Science Information, V (1966), 71–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nasatir, David, Social Science Data Libraries, American Sociologist, II (1967), 207–212.Google Scholar

(28) Cf. Schlesinger, Rudolf B., The Common Core of Legal Systems: An Emergent Subject of Comparative Study, in Nadelman, Kurt H., von Mehren, Arthur T. and Hazard, John N. (eds.), XXth Century Comparative and Conflicts Law: Legal Essays in Honor of Hessel E. Yntema (Leyden, A. W. Sythoff, 1961), pp. 65–79.Google Scholar

(29) Cf. Moore, Wilbert E., Global Sociology: The World as a Singular System, American Journal of Sociology, LXXI (1966), 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar