Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:03:58.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Returning to Risk Regulation after a Long Journey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contributions
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Professor of EU Law, University of Louvain (Belgium); email: [email protected].

References

1 The seminal work by K&T earned them the Nobel Prize for Economics in 2002 “for having integrated insights from psychological research into economic science, especially concerning human judgment and decision-making under uncertainty”. For a very accessible account of this research, see D Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2011).

2 For some example in various walks of regulatory studies, see Rajeev Gowda, “Heuristics, biases, and the regulation of risk” (1999) 32 Policy Sciences 59, doi:10.1023/A:1004340726008; SA Drakopoulos, and I Theodossiou “Workers’ Risk Underestimation and Occupational Health and Safety Regulation”, MPRA paper, 2011, <https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/29643>; CR Sunstein and R Zeckhauser, “Overreaction to Fearsome Risks” (2011) 48 Environmental and Resource Economics 435, doi 10.1007/s10640-010-9449-3; C Sunstein, Valuing Life: Humanizing the Regulatory State (University of Chicago Press 2014) ch 7; A Alemanno and others, Better Business Regulation in a Risk Society (Springer 2013) esp. ch 17 by all four editors of the volume.

3 See e.g. E Shafir (ed.), The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy (Princeton University Press, 2013).