No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 July 2017
Associate Director of the Institute on Science for Global Policy.
Chief Communications Officer at Intrexxon.
1 Funk, C and Kennedy, B, “The New Food Fights: U.S. Public Divides over Food Science: Differing views on Benefits and Risks of Organic Foods, GMOs as Americans Report a Higher Priority for Healthy Eating” (2016) Pew Research Center, available at <http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/12/01/the-new-food-fights/> (accessed 27 March 2017)Google Scholar.
2 Roughly equal shares of Republicans (39%) and Democrats (40%) feel that GM foods are worse for people’s health. And half of Republicans (50%) and 60% of Democrats have positive views about the health benefits of organic foods.
3 J Bobo and S Chakraborty, “Predictably irrational consumer food preferences” (2016) 7(3) European Journal of Risk Regulation 604.
4 United States Department of Agriculture, “Organic food labeling”, available at <https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/organic/labeling> (accessed 11 July 2016).
5 The term “healthy” and related terms (“health”, “healthful”, “healthfully”, “healthfulness”, “healthier”, “healthiest”, “healthily” and “healthiness”) may be used if the food meets the following requirements available at <http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm064916.htm>.
6 National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, “Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects” (National Academies Press 2016), available at <https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23395/genetically-engineered-crops-experiences-and-prospects>>Google Scholar.
7 Funk and Kennedy, supra note 1.
8 Funk, C and Rainie, L, “Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society” (Pew Research Center 2015), available at <http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/chapter-3-attitudes-and-beliefs-on-science-and-technology-topics/> (accessed 27 March 2017)+(accessed+27+March+2017)>Google Scholar.
9 Kahneman, D and Tversky, A, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk” (1979) 47(2) Econometrica 263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Festinger, L, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Row, Peterson 1957)Google Scholar.
11 Nickerson, R, “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises” (1998) 2(2) Review of General Psychology 175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Mercier, H and Sperber, D, The Enigma of Reason (Harvard University Press 2017)Google Scholar.
13 Kahan, D, “Ordinary Science Intelligence: A Science-Comprehension Measure for Study of Risk and Science Communication, with Notes on Evolution and Climate Change” (2014) Journal of Risk Research Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 504; The Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 112, available at <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2466715> or <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2466715> (accessed 27 March 2017)Google Scholar.
14 Sloman, S and Fernbach, P, The Knowledge Illusion: Why We Never Think Alone (Riverhead Publishing 2014)Google Scholar.
15 Chakraborty, S, “Risk and Crisis Communication Recommendations for Industry Based on Advances in Cognitive Behavioral Science Research” (2014) 2 European Journal of Risk Regulation 238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.