Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-05T23:07:28.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Greatest Possible Freedom: Interpretive Formulas and Their Spin in Free Movement Case Law Thomas Burri Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015, 606pp. Hardcover

Review products

The Greatest Possible Freedom: Interpretive Formulas and Their Spin in Free Movement Case Law Thomas Burri Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015, 606pp. Hardcover

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Simon PLANZER*
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Law at the University of St Gallen E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Joseph HH, Weiler, “The Court of Justice on Trial: A Review of Hjalte Rasmussen: On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice” (1987) 24(3) Common Market Law Review 555 Google Scholar, 589; Miguel Poiares, Maduro, “Interpreting European Law: Judicial Adjudication in a Context of Constitutional Pluralism” (Working Paper IE Law School, 5 February 2008; available at <https://ssrn.com/abstract=1134503> (accessed 31 March 2017)+(accessed+31+March+2017)>Google Scholar.

2 Hjalte Rasmussen, , On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice: A Comparative Study in Judicial Policymaking (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.