Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:04:55.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European Citizens Initiative “STOP TTIP” Can Proceed Says General Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2017

Elaine FAHEY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Case Commentaries
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 8 , Special Issue 4: Special Issue on the EU Public-Health-Security Nexus , December 2017 , pp. 787 - 790
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Reader in Law and Associate Dean (International), City Law School, City, University of London; [email protected].

References

1 Case T-754/14 Efler and Others v Commission ECLI:EU:T:2017:323. See <stop-ttip.org/the-eci-result-in-numbers> and <stop-ttip.org/sign>, accessed 18 August 2017.

2 Established after the EU-US Summit in 2011, followed by an Interim Report on 19 June, 2012. See Final Report High Level Working Group on Jobs and Growth, 11 February 2013, available at <trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/february/tradoc_150519.pdf>.

3 Eg De Ville, F and Siles-Brugge, G, TTIP: The Truth about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (Polity, 2015)Google Scholar; Cremona, M, “Guest Editorial: Negotiating the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)” (2015) 52 CMLR 351 Google Scholar.

4 See <ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/ceta/index_en.htm>, accessed 18 August 2017. See such descriptions in many press releases and EU official briefings on CETA: <trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1570>, accessed 18 August 2017) (eg EU Council president, or from EU Commissioner for Trade).

5 Fahey, E, “CETA and Global Governance: What Kind of Model Agreement is it in Law?” (2017) 2(1) European Papers, European Forum, Insight Google Scholar of 9 February 2017, 293-302; Petersmann, E-U, “Transformative Transatlantic Free Trade Agreements without Rights and Remedies of Citizens?” (2015) 18(3) Journal of International Economic Law 579 Google Scholar.

6 Such a proposal would not deploy any autonomous legal effect beyond the fact of the legal act at issue not being adopted.

7 Karatzia, A, “The European Citizens’ Initiative and the EU institutional balance: On realism and the possibilities of affecting EU lawmaking” (2017) 54(1) CMLR 177 Google Scholar; S Schill, “The Constitutional Frontiers of International Economic Law” EJIL Talk (7 March 2017) available at <www.ejiltalk.org/the-constitutional-frontiers-of-international-economic-law/>.

8 Karatzia, supra, note 7.

9 Van Bogdandy, A, “The European Lesson for International Democracy: The Significance of Articles 9-12 EU Treaty for International Organisations” (2012) 23(2) EJIL 315 Google Scholar; Mendes, J, “Participation and the role of law after Lisbon: A legal view on Article 11 TEU” (2011) 48(6) CMLR 1849 Google Scholar.

10 Case T-646/13 Bürgerausschuss für die Bürgerinitiative Minority SafePack [2017] ECLI:EU:T:2017:59.

11 Karatzia, supra, note 7.

12 See Fahey, E, “On the Benefits of the TTIP Negotiations for the EU Legal Order: Legal Perspectives” (2016) 43(4) LEIE 327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Fahey, supra, note 12.