No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Elizabeth Weiss and James W. Springer. Repatriation and Erasing the Past (Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 2020, xii and 265pp., 24 figs, 5 tables, hbk, ISBN 9781683401575, pdf ISBN 9781683401858)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 December 2021
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Association of Archaeologists
References
Chari, S. & Lavallee, J.M. eds. 2013. Accomplishing NAGPRA: Perspectives on the Intent, Impact, and Future of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. 2011. ‘Sketching Knowledge: Quandaries in the Mimetic Reproduction of Pueblo Ritual’. American Ethnologist, 38(3): 451–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C.; Maxson, R. & Powell, J. 2011. ‘The Repatriation of Culturally Unidentifiable Human Remains’. Museum Management and Curatorship, 26(1): 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colwell, C. 2017. Plundered Skulls and Stolen Spirits: Inside the Fight to Reclaim Native America's Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daehnke, J. & Lonetree, A. 2011. ‘Repatriation in the United States: The Current State of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act’. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 35(1): 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, C.W. 2011. ‘Contesting Scientists' Narrations of NAGPRA's Legislative History Rule 10.11 and the Recovery of “Culturally Unidentifiable” Ancestors’. Wicazo Sa Review, 26(1): 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, T.J.; Anyon, R. & Ladd, E.J. 2000. ‘Repatriation at the Pueblo of Zuni: Diverse Solutions to Complex Problems’. In: Mihesuah, Devon A., ed. Repatriation Reader: Who Owns American Indian Remains? Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 239–65.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, S.L. & Marek-Martinez, O. 2015. ‘NAGPRA and the Next Generation of Collaboration’. SAA Archaeological Record, 15(1): 11–13.Google Scholar
Kakaliouras, A.M. 2014. ‘When Remains are ‘Lost’: Thoughts on Collections, Repatriation, and Research in American Physical Anthropology’. Curator, 57(2): 213–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, B.M. et al. 2007. ‘Genetic Analysis of Early Holocene Skeletal Remains from Alaska and Its Implications for the Settlement of the Americas’. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 132 (4): 605–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kintigh, K. 1991. ‘Repatriation We Can Live With’. Bulletin of the Society for American Archaeology, 9(1): 2–3.Google Scholar
Kuwanwisiwma, L.J.; Ferguson, T.J. & Colwell, C. eds. 2018. Footprints of Hopi History: Hopihiniwtiput Kukveni'at. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, C.T. 2013. In the Smaller Scope of Conscience: The Struggle for National Repatriation Legislation, 1986–1990. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, J.L. 2014. ‘NAGPRA and the Penn Museum: Reconciling Science and the Sacred’. Concept, 37: 1–21.Google Scholar
Roy, L.; Bhasin, A. & Arriaga, S.K. 2011. Tribal Libraries, Archives, and Museums: Preserving Our Language, Memory, and Lifeways. Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Wade, L. 2021. An Archaeology Society Hosted a Talk Against Returning Indigenous Remains. Some Want a New Society [accessed May 28, 2021]. Available at: <https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/04/archaeology-society-hosted-talk-against-returning-indigenous-remains-some-want-new>CrossRef>Google Scholar
Weiss, E. 2008. Reburying the Past: The Effects of Repatriation and Reburial on Scientific Inquiry. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar