Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:38:16.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Straining flow of a weakly interacting polymer–surfactant solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2015

C. J. W. BREWARD ,
I. M. GRIFFITHS ,
P. D. HOWELL  and
C. E. MORGAN
C. J. W. BREWARD
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
I. M. GRIFFITHS
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
P. D. HOWELL
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
C. E. MORGAN
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the straining flow of a weakly interacting polymer–surfactant solution below a free surface, with the bulk surfactant concentration above the critical micelle concentration. We formulate a set of coupled differential equations describing the concentration of monomers, micelles, polymer, and polymer–micelle aggregates in the flow. We analyse the model in several asymptotic limits, and make predictions about the distribution of each of the species. In particular, in the large-reaction-rate limit we find that the model predicts a region near the free surface where no micelles or aggregates are present, and beneath this a region where the concentration of surfactant is constant, across which the concentration of aggregates increases until all the free polymer is consumed. For certain parameter regimes, a maximum in the concentration of the polymer–micelle complex occurs within the bulk fluid. In the finite-reaction-rate limit, micelles, and aggregates are present right up to the free surface, and the plateau in the concentration of surfactant in the bulk is no longer present. Results from the asymptotic theory compare favorably with full numerical solutions.

Keywords

Surfactantsboundary layersasymptotic analysisadvection-diffusion-reaction equations
Type
Papers
Information
European Journal of Applied Mathematics , Volume 26 , Special Anniversay Issue 5: Celebrating 75 years , October 2015 , pp. 743 - 772
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Adamson, A. W. (1982) Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, Wiley, New York, USA.Google Scholar
[2]Bahramian, A., Thomas, R. K. & Penfold, J. (2014) The adsorption behavior of ionic surfactants and their mixtures with nonionic polymers and with polyelectrolytes of opposite charge at the air-water interface. J. Phys. Chem. B 118 (10), 2769–2783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[3]Bain, C. D., Manning-Benson, S. & Darton, R. C. (2000) Rates of mass transfer and adsorption of hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide at an expanding air-water interface. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 229 (1), 247–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[4]Bain, C. D. (2008) The overflowing cylinder sixty years on. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 144 (1), 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Bell, C. G., Breward, C. J. W., Howell, P. D., Penfold, J. & Thomas, R. K. (2007) Macroscopic modelling of the surface tension of polymer–surfactant solutions. Langmuir 23 (11), 6042–6052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Bell, C. G., Breward, C. J. W, Howell, P. D., Penfold, J. & Thomas, R. K. (2010) A theoretical analysis of the surface tension profiles of strongly interacting polymer–surfactant systems. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 350 (2), 486–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[7]Breward, C. J. W., Darton, R. C., Howell, P. D. & Ockendon, J. R. (2001) The effect of surfactant on expanding free surfaces. Chem. Eng. Sci. 56 (8), 2867–2878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Breward, C. J. W., & Howell, P. D. (2004) Straining flow of micellar surfactant solution. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 15 (5), 511–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Cabane, B. & Duplessix, R. (1985) Neutron-scattering study of water-soluble polymers adsorbed on surfactant micelles, Colloid Surf. 13, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Goddard, E. D. (1986) Polymer–surfactant interaction part I. Uncharged water-soluble polymers and charged surfactants, Colloid Surf. 19 (2–3), 255–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Goddard, E. D. (1986) Polymer–surfactant interaction part II. Polymer and surfactant of opposite charge. Colloid Surf. 19 (2–3), 301–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Goddard, E. D. (2002) Polymer/surfactant interaction: Interfacial aspects. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 256 (1), 228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Goddard, E. D. & Ananthapadmanabhan, K. P. (1993) Interactions of Surfactants with Polymers and Proteins, CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
[14]Howell, P. D. & Breward, C. J. W. (2002) Mathematical modelling of the overflowing cylinder experiment. J. Fluid Mech. 458, 379–406.Google Scholar
[15]Kwak, J. C. T. (1998) Polymer–Surfactant Systems, Surfactant Science Series, Vol. 77, Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
[16]Monteux, C. (2014) Adsorption of soluble polymers at liquid interfaces and in foams. C. R. Phys. 15 (8), 775–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Penfold, J., Sivia, D. S., Staples, E., Tucker, I., & Thomas, R. K. (2004) Surface ordering in dilute dihexadecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide solutions at the air–water interface. Langmuir 20 (6), 2265–2269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[18]Purcell, I. P., Lu, J. R., Thomas, R. K., Howe, A. M. & Penfold, J. (1998) Adsorption of sodium dodecyl sulfate at the surface of aqueous solutions of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) studied by neutron reflection. Langmuir 14 (7), 1637–1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar