Etomidate-induced suppression of cortisol biosynthesis is a result of a blockade of 11-beta-hydroxylation in the adrenal gland, mediated by the imidazol radical of etomidate. Since the generation of steroids requires reductive and energy rich equivalents, the present study examined whether supplementation with ascorbic acid or xylitol, a major source of NADPH, could attenuate adrenal suppression by etomidate in human subjects by promoting the turnover rate of 11-beta-hydroxylase. During continuous etomidate/alfentanil anaesthesia for pelviscopic surgery 30 female patients received either Ringer's lactate, xylitol (0.25 g kg−1 h−1) or ascorbic acid (0.5 g h−1) intravenously (i.v.). The plasma concentrations of cortisol, aldosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) were recorded for 5 h after end of surgery and a stimulation with synthetic ACTH was performed. The results showed no evidence of a clinically relevant attenuating effect of ascorbic acid or xylitol on etomidate-induced adrenocortical suppression. However, the observed suppression of cortisol levels was not enough to allow an attenuating affect to be measured.

The molecular effects of droperidol (C22H22FN3O2) on single sodium channels from the human brain were investigated using the electrophysiological planar lipid-bilayer technique. Droperidol (0.05–0.8 mm) induced a concentration dependent and voltage independent reduction in the time averaged single channel conductance by two mechanisms: a reduction in the fractional channel open time (major effect, approximately 90%) and a decrease in the channel amplitude (minor effect). The weighted computer fit of the concentration response for the combined effect curve yielded an EC50 of 0.68 mm droperidol and a maximal conductance block of 77%. These blocking effects of droperidol on CNS sodium channels occurred at a concentration range comparable with other specific anaesthetic compounds but far beyond clinical serum levels (up to 0.002 mm). Therefore in contrast with animal preparations (frog peripheral nerve, sodium channel) the human brain sodium channel is not a major target site for droperidol during clinical anaesthesia.

Summary

Background and objective: To compare the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron with two different hypnotic drugs (propofol 15 mg, midazolam 1 and 2 mg) for the treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Methods: Four-hundred-and-fifty-three patients scheduled for elective gynaecological or abdominal surgery were enrolled. One-hundred-and-twenty patients (26%) experienced postoperative emesis, and when nausea scores reached 2 or greater on a five-point scale, they were randomized to receive intravenously: propofol 15 mg (1.5 mL) in Group P, midazolam 1 mg in Group M1, midazolam 2 mg in Group M2 and ondansetron 4 mg in Group O.

Results: Four patients (13.3%) in Group P, 13 patients (43.3%) in Group M1, five patients (16.6%) in Group M2 and one patient (3.3%) in Group O required a second dose of the study drug. After administration of the study drugs, nausea scores were significantly lower in all groups than before these drugs were given. No patient had a sedation score over 3 (the patients remained awake and/or responded to verbal contact). The sedative effects of midazolam and propofol lasted for a much shorter time than the antiemetic effects of these drugs.

Conclusions: Propofol and midazolam used in subhypnotic doses were as effective as ondansetron in treating PONV in patients undergoing abdominal or gynaecological surgery without untoward sedative or cardiovascular effects.

In a prospective randomized study in children, we compared caudal bupivacaine–clonidine with bupivacaine–morphine to evaluate whether clonidine can be used as an alternative to morphine in caudal anaesthesia. Caudal anaesthesia was administered in 36 children undergoing orchidopexy, hernia repair or circumcision, using 1.5 mL kg−1 bupivacaine 0.18% with either 1 μg kg−1 clonidine (group 1) or 30 μg kg−1 morphine (group 2). Haemodynamic and respiratory parameters, anaesthetic requirements, recovery time and pain score were monitored for 24 h. Eleven children in group 1 and nine children in group 2 did not need any supplementary systemic analgesics throughout the 24-h observation period. Mean (±SD) duration of analgesia in the remaining patients was 6.3 h (±3.3 h) in group 1 and 7.1 h (±3.4 h) in group 2 (P=0.43). Recovery time after anaesthesia was significantly longer in group 1 (16.6±8.8 min) than in group 2 (11.5±4.7 min) (P< 0.05). We conclude that analgesia provided by 1 μg kg−1 clonidine added to caudal bupivacaine is comparable with that provided by 30 μg kg−1 caudal morphine with bupivacaine. Clonidine at this low dose did not cause respiratory depression.

In order to compare the effect of atropine and sodium chloride on the dynamic compliance of the respiratory system after tracheal intubation, we studied 20 patients allocated randomly into two groups to receive either: atropine after 5 min of steady state and sodium chloride after 10 min (group A) or in reverse order (group B) intravenously. The study was conducted in a randomized double-blinded manner. The patients were anaesthetized with thiopental 5 mg kg−1 followed by thiopental 50 mg intravenously, as required. Intubation was facilitated by atracurium 0.5mg kg−1 intravenously and fentanyl 200 μg intravenously. During fixed volume ventilation (100 mL kg−1, f=10), compliance and end-tidal carbon dioxide were measured every 10 s by a Datex AS/3-respiratory module connected to a portable IBM-pc. Five minutes was allowed to establish a steady state then either atropine or sodium chloride was administered according to the protocol. Respiratory dynamic compliance increased significantly after intravenous administration of atropine (P < 0.05). We conclude that atropine 1.0 mg given intravenously provides protection against an intubation-induced decline in respiratory dynamic compliance.

The most suitable time for tracheal intubation, following vecuronium 0.1 mg kg−1, was estimated in 120 patients. The trachea was intubated at cessation of the visually observed response of the orbicularis oculi muscle to facial nerve stimulation (group 1; n = 30), or of the manually detected response of the adductor pollicis to ulnar nerve stimulation (group 2; n = 30), or after waiting 3 min (group 3; n = 30), or 4 min (group 4; n = 30). There were no significant differences in intubation scores between the four groups of patients. Loss of response to train-of-four stimulation occurred significantly sooner in group 1 (orbicularis oculi) than in group 2 (adductor pollicis) P = 0.021). However, intubating conditions were poor in four patients (14%) in group 1, compared with none in group 2 and one in groups 3 and 4, respectively. Thus, contrary to expectations, the cessation of the response of the orbicularis oculi muscle did not guarantee good or even satisfactory intubating conditions. The results suggest that in fit adult patients it is as good to wait 3 min after injection of vecuronium 0.1 mg kg−1 before tracheal intubation, as to use a nerve stimulator.

The short-term effect of intravenous (i.v.) angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalaprilat in 10 critically ill patients, being ventilated with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), on sodium and water excretion was investigated. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased. Heart rate and central venous pressure (CVP) did not change. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urine volume (V) and sodium excretion (UNaV) decreased in two patients with reduced MAP. GFR, V and UNaV increased in two patients with decreased MAP. No relation between changes in MAP and excretion was observed in six patients. ACE decreased in all patients. Plasma renin activity increased, aldosterone decreased, while atrial natriuretic peptide as well as antidiuretic hormone did not change. Enalaprilat did not facilitate sodium and water excretion during ventilation with PEEP. Decreased MAP indicates that the investigated patients were very dependent on their renin-angiotensin system to maintain systemic perfusion pressure. Base-line MAP and CVP values were no predictors of haemodynamic and excretory changes following acute ACE inhibition.

We have studied the apnoea time after induction with two successful drug intubating regimes, both containing remifentanil. Group 1 (n=20); propofol 2 mg kg−1 and remifentanil 2 μg kg−1 and group 2 (n=20); propofol 2 mg kg−1, remifentanil 1 μg kg−1 and lignocaine 1 mg kg−1. Intubation was possible in all 40 patients, and regarded as acceptable in 90% and 85% of patients, respectively. The median time to the return of spontaneous respiration was 487 s in group 1 and 270 s in group 2 (P < 0.05). Median end-tidal CO2 concentration at the time of the first spontaneous respiration was 7.37 kPa in group 1 and 6.3 kPa in group 2 (P < 0.05). Both groups had a decrease in heart rate after induction, but this failed to reach either clinical or statistical significance, and no patient required atropine. Similarly, there was a decrease in arterial pressure after induction in both groups (P < 0.05), but this was not deemed to be clinically significant. Only two patients in each group required ephedrine 6 mg before arterial pressure was restored to within 25% of the base-line. Intubating conditions were similar in both groups, but group 2 provided a significantly shorter apnoea time.

Summary

Background and objective: Regional anaesthesia has not been recommended as an anaesthetic method for penetrating eye injuries because it is suspected to aggravate the injury already present. After having successfully managed the treatment of a penetrating eye injury under combined peri- and retrobulbar block in an ASA IV patient, it was decided to evaluate this anaesthetic method further in the treatment of such emergency cases.

Methods: Twenty adult patients with penetrating eye injuries with a maximum wound length of 8 mm extending up to 4 mm posteriorly from the limbus were operated on under combined peri- and retrobulbar anaesthesia. Eighteen patients receiving general anaesthesia served as controls.

Results: The mean (range) volume injected for a satisfactory peribulbar retrobulbar block was 7.4 (6.5–8.0) mL, six patients needed an additional retrobulbar injection before surgery (2.9, range 2–4, mL). All patients receiving regional anaesthesia were satisfied with the anaesthetic method and the surgeons considered the surgical conditions as good. No problems relating to local anaesthesia were observed or reported by any of the patients.

Conclusions: In the hands of an experienced anaesthesiologist and under certain conditions, regional anaesthesia appears to be suitable for adult patients having penetrating eye injuries.