Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:06:29.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Court of Justice of the European Communities

While the Advocate-General Finds Eurojust’s Language Rules for Job Applicants Partly Contrary to Union Law, the Court Dismisses Case for Lack of Standing. Decision of 15 March 2005 in Case C-160/03, Kingdom of Spain v. Eurojust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2006

Richard L. Creech
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As a result of the 2004 enlargement there are now twenty languages that are accorded official, and theoretically equal, status in the institutions of the European Union. With the expansion of the Union’s linguistic landscape some Union bodies, while allowing the use of more and more languages, have paradoxically limited the circumstances under which most of them may be used. To put it mildly, these efforts, as Advocate-General Poiares Maduro said in his opinion in Case C-160/03, Kingdom of Spain v. Eurojust, 2005 ECR I-2077, have been ‘a matter of some controversy’.

Keywords

European Court of JusticeEurojustLanguage rules of the EULanguage RegimeLanguage RequirementsJob CandidatesDiscriminationAdmissibilityFundamental Principles of Union LawJudicial Review
Type
Case Notes
Information
European Constitutional Law Review , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 147 - 151
Copyright
Asser Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)