Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:31:43.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Rescue: Yugoslavia's Wars and the Humanitarian Impulse1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

Amir Pasic  and
Thomas G. Weiss
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pasic and Weiss examine the limitations and the ethical dilemmas of the humanitarian impulse in light of the recent surge in humanitarian intervention. The authors use the experience of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in the former Yugoslavia as an example of the way in which politics and humanitarianism are inextricably intertwined. They describe a spectrum of intervention, from rescue to restorative to revolutionary efforts. Rescue efforts often fail to address the underlying political problems, but for a rescuing nation to commit to “revolutionary” intervention and sustained support raises the issue of state sovereignty. Asserting that humanitarian intervention is a highly ambiguous principle, the authors warn of the dangers of politically driven rescues that often force trade-offs between the pursuit of rescue and political order.

Type
Articles
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 11 , March 1997 , pp. 105 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Vayrenen, Raimo, The Age of Humanitarian Emergencies (Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research, June 1996), draft working paper.Google Scholar

3 See Makinda, Samuel M., “Sovereignty and International Security,” Global Governance 2 (May-August 1996), 149–68Google Scholar, and Weiss, Thomas G., “Military-Civilian Humanitarianism: The ‘Age of Innocence’ Is Over,” International Peacekeeping 2 (Summer 1995), 157–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Wapner, Paul, “Politics Beyond the State: Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics,” World Politics 47 (April 1995), 311–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Pease, Kelly Kate and Forsythe, David P., “Human Rights, Humanitarian Intervention, and World Politics,” Human Rights Quarterly 15 (1993), 290–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 See a special issue on , “Rescue—The Paradoxes of Virtue,” Social Research 62 (Spring 1995)Google Scholar, especially Michael Walzer's “The Politics of Rescue,” 53–66. See also Rieff, David, “The Humanitarian Trap,” World Policy Journal 12 (Winter 1994–95), 1–11Google Scholar.

6 See Krasner, Stephen, “Sovereignty and Intervention” in Lyons, Gene and Mastanduno, Michael, eds., Beyond Westphalia? State Sovereignty and International Intervention (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995), 228–49Google Scholar, and Bull, Hedley, ed., Intervention in World Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984)Google Scholar.

7 Complete bibliographic information and its interpretation are found in Oliver Famsbotham and Woodhouse, Tom, Humanitarian Intervention in Contemporary Conflict (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996Google Scholar). See also Harriss, John, ed., The Politics of Humanitarian Intervention (London: Pinter, 1995Google Scholar); Mayall, James, ed., The New Interventionism: United Nations Experience in Cambodia, Former Yugoslavia, and Somalia (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Nederveen Pieterse, Jan, ed., World Orders in the Making: Humanitarian Intervention and Beyond (London: Macmillan, forthcoming)Google Scholar.

8 See Minear, Larry and Weiss, Thomas G., Mercy Under Fire: War and the Global Humanitarian Community (Boulder: Westview Press, 1995)Google Scholar, and Humanitarian Politics (New York: Foreign Policy Association, 1995)Google Scholar.

9 Clinton, Bill, “Why Bosnia Matters to America,” Newsweek 126, November 13, 1995, 55Google Scholar.

10 Here it is interesting to note the alteration in the French literature from devoir (or duty) to droit (right). See Kouchner, Bernard and Bettati, Mario, Le devoir ďingérence: Peut-on les laisser mourir? (Paris: Denoël, 1987)Google Scholar, and Bettati, Mario, Le droit ďingérence: Mutation de ľordre international (Paris: Odile Jacob, 1996Google Scholar).

11 Department of State, Clinton Administration's Policy on Reforming Multilateral Peace Operations (Pub. 1061, Bureau of IO Affairs, May 1994), which explicates a presidential directive known as PDD-25. See also Seiple, Chris, The U.S. Military/NGO Relationships in Humanitarian Interventions (U.S. Army War College Peacekeeping Institute: Center for Strategic Leadership, 1996)Google Scholar; Com. Richard R. Beardsworth, Com. Richard V. Kikla, Lt. Col. Philip F. Shutler, and Col. Guy C. Swan, Strengthening Coordination Mechanisms Between NCOs and the U.S. Military at the Theater/Country Level During Complex Humanitarian Emergencies, draft, March 1996, from Harvard University's National Security Program; and Allard, Kenneth, Somalia Operations: Lessons Learned (Washington, DC: National Defense University Press, 1995)Google Scholar. For a critical perspective proposing that preparation for and engagement in peace operations diminish the military's preparedness, see Colonel Dunlap, Charles J., “The Last American Warrior: Non-traditional Missions and the Decline of the U.S. Armed Forces,” The Fletcher Forum for World Affairs 18 (Winter/Spring 1994), 65–82Google Scholar.

12 See Connaughton, R. M., Military Support and Protection for Humanitarian Assistance: Rwanda, April-December 1994 (Camberly,, Surrey, U.K.: Strategic and Combat Studies Institute, 1996), 18, p. 71Google Scholar. See also Hugo Slim, “The Stretcher and the Drum: Civil-Military Relations in Peace Support Operations,” paper presented in Pretoria, South Africa, March 13–14, 1996.

13 See Weiss, Thomas G. and Pasic, Amir, “Reinventing UNHCR: Enterprising Humanitarians in the Former Yugoslavia, 1991–1995,” Global Governance 3 (January–March 1997), 41–57Google Scholar.

14 United States Mission to the United Nations, Global Humanitarian Emergencies, 1996, document dated February 1996, p. 24. The periods vary slightly, and there may be some needs and some disbursements not reflected in the data. The accuracy of the broad comparative data and the privileged position of the former Yugoslavia, however, are clearGoogle Scholar.

15 Quoted by Mitchell, Alison, “Clinton's About-Face,” New York Times, September 24, 1996, A8Google Scholar.

16 Thornberry, Cedric, “Saving the War Crimes Tribunal,” Foreign Policy 104 (Fall 1996), 72–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quote at 75.

17 For an elaboration of the foundational role played by neutrality and impartiality at the core of the identity and mission of the International Committee of the Red Cross and the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, see Plattner, Denise, “ICRC Neutrality and Neutrality in Humanitarian Assistance,” International Review of the Red Cross 36 (1996), 161–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Clearly, our discussion assumes that humanitarianism cannot be apolitical and that the dilemma at hand revolves around the principled relation between humanitarianism and sovereignty.

18 For example, see AH, Rabia and Lifschultz, Lawrence, eds., Why Bosnia? Writings on the Balkan War (Stony Creek, CT: Pamphleteer's Press, 1993)Google Scholar.

19 For a review of the limits of the post-Cold War ambitions of humanitarian intervention, see Stedman, Stephen John, “The New Interventionists,” Foreign Affairs 72 (Winter 1993), 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a normative argument in the opposite direction, see Rodley, Nigel, ed., To Loose the Bonds of Wickedness: International Intervention in Defence of Human Rights (London: Brassey's, 1992)Google Scholar.

20 The most controversial analysis is Rakiya Omaar and Alex Waal, de, Humanitarianism Unbound? Current Dilemmas Facing Multi-Mandate Relief Operations in Political Emergencies (London: African Rights, 1994)Google Scholar, Discussion Paper No. 5. There is also a rapidly growing literature on the political dimensions of humanitarian action and peacekeeping. See, for example, Chopra, Jarat, “The Space of Peace-Maintenance,” Political Geography 15 (1996), 335–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Donini, Antonio, The Policies of Mercy: UN Coordination in Afghanistan, Mozambique, and Rwanda (Providence: Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute for International Studies, 1996)Google Scholar, Occasional Paper No. 22.

21 Destexhe, Alain, “Foreword,” in Jean, Fraçois, ed., Populations in Danger 1995 (London: Médecins Sans Frontières, 1995), 13–14Google Scholar.

22 For a recent infusion of sobriety, see Mansfield, Ed and Snyder, Jack, “Democratization and the Danger of War,” International Security 20 (Summer 1995), 5–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar. A less technical version can be found in Foreign Affairs 74 (1995), 79–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a general argument regarding the priority of order over justice, see Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar).

23 For collections of essays, see Heiberg, Marianne, ed., Subduing Sovereignty: Sovereignty and the Right to Intervene (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Lyons, andMastanduno, , eds., Beyond Westphalia?; and Winters, Paul A., ed., Interventionism: Current Controversies (San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

24 See Helman, Gerald B. and Ratner, Steven R., “Saving Failed States,” Foreign Policy 89 (Winter 1992–93), 3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and William Zartman, I., ed., Collapsed States: The Disintegration and Restoration of Legitimate Authority (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1995)Google Scholar.

25 See Hoffmann, Stanley, Duties Beyond Borders: On the Limits and Possibilities of Ethical International Politics (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1981Google Scholar).

26 For a brief overview of the political obstacles that marred the humanitarian mission in Bosnia, see Mark, Prutsalis, “Humanitarian Aid: Too Little, Too Late,” in Cohen, Ben and Stamkoski, George, eds., With No Peace to Keep: United Nations Peacekeeping and the War in the Former Yugoslavia (London: Grainpress Ltd., 1995), 77–85Google Scholar.

27 One analytical effort to understand this phenomenon is Weiss, Thomas G. and Collins, Cindy, Humanitarian Challenges and Intervention: World Politics and the Dilemmas of Help (Boulder: West-view, 1996Google Scholar).

28 Woodward, Susan, “Redrawing Borders in a Period of Systemic Transition,” in Esman, Milton and Telhami, Shibley, eds., International Organizations and Ethnic Conflict (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995), 213Google Scholar.

29 Crocker, Chester A., “All Aid Is Political,” New York Times, November 21, 1996, A29Google Scholar.

30 See Prendergast, John, Frontline Diplomacy: Humanitarian Aid and Conflict in Africa (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1996)Google Scholar; and Maren, Michael, The Road to Hell: The Ravaging Effects of Foreign Aid and International Charity (New York: Free Press, 1997Google Scholar).

31 For discussions of the ICRC's principles and approaches, see Forsythe, David P., Humanitarian Politics (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977),Google Scholarand Joyce, James A., Red Cross International and the Strategy for Peace (New York: Oceana, 1959Google Scholar).

32 See the discussion of the use of relief resources to feed soldiers and as bribes for safe passage in Eknes, Age, “The United Nations' Predicament in the Former Yugoslavia,” in Weiss, Thomas G., ed., The United Nations and Civil Wars (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1995), 109–26Google Scholar. In mid-1994, he wrote: “The accusation that the United Nations has indirectly legitimized ethnic cleansing and territorial aggression does not bite as much today—not because it is less true but because it has become a fact of life” (p. 124). For a discussion of the possible manipulation of aid agencies by belligerents, see Smith, Gayle E., “Relief Operations and Military Strategy,” in Weiss, Thomas G. and Minear, Larry, eds., Humanitarianism Across Borders: Sustaining Civilians in Times of War (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1993), 97–116Google Scholar.

33 Quoted by Wren, Christopher S., “Resettling Refugees: U.N. Facing New Burden,” New York Times, November 24, 1995, A15Google Scholar.

34 See van der Wind, O., Report Based on the Debriefing on Srebrenica (Assen: Netherlands Ministry of Defence, October 4, 1995)Google Scholar.

35 Tugendhat, Ernst, “The Moral Dilemma in the Rescue of Refugees,” Social Research 62 (Spring 1995), 127–41Google Scholar.

36 For a discussion of migration as a multifaceted security issue, see Teitelbaum, Michael S. and Weiner, Myron, eds., Threatened Peoples, Threatened Borders: World Migration and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Norton, 1995)Google Scholar, and Weiner, Myron, ed., International Migration and Security (Boulder: Westview, 1993)Google Scholar.

37 For an overview of the issues raised by the secretary-general on internally displaced persons, see Deng, Francis M., Protecting the Dispossessed: A Challenge for the International Community (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1993)Google Scholar. See also Cohen, Roberta and Cuenod, Jacques, Improving Institutional Arrangements for the Internally Displaced (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, October 1995)Google Scholar, and Deng, Francis M., “Dealing with the Displaced: A Challenge to the International Community,” Global Governance 1 (Winter 1995), 45–58Google Scholar.

38 See Denitch, Bogdan, Ethnic Nationalism: The Tragic Death of Yugoslavia (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994), 173–85Google Scholar; Cigar, Norman, Genocide in Bosnia: The Policy of “Ethnic Cleansing” (College Station: Texas A&M Press, 1995), 22–37Google Scholar; Gagnon, V. P., “Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflict: The Case of Serbia,” International Security 19 (Winter 1994/95), 130–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Magas, Branka, The Destruction of Yugoslavia: Tracking the Breakup 1980–92 (London: Verso, 1993)Google Scholar; Curuvija, Slavko and Torov, Ivan, ‘The March to War (1980–1990),’ in Udovicki, Jasminka and Ridgeway, James, eds., Yugoslavia's Ethnic Nightmare: The Inside Story of Europe's Unfolding Ordeal (Chicago: Lawrence Hill Books, 1995)Google Scholar; Glenny, Misha, The Fall of Yugoslavia: The Third Balkan War (New York: Penguin, 1992)Google Scholar; Woodward, Susan, Balkan Tragedy: Chaos and Dissolution after the Cold War (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1995)Google Scholar; and Ullman, Richard H., ed., The World and Yugoslavia's Wars (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1996)Google Scholar.

39 See A UNHCR Handbook for the Military on Humanitarian Operations (Geneva: UNHCR, January 1995)Google Scholar.

40 Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Division of Protection, International, UNHCR's Operational Experience with Internally Displaced Persons (Geneva: UNHCR, September 1994)Google Scholar.

41 See Cunliffe, Alex and Pugh, Michael, “The UNHCR as Lead Agency in the Former Yugoslavia,” Journal of Humanitarian Assistance (April 1, 1996), http://131.111.106.147/Articles/A011.htmGoogle Scholar.

42 For an explication of the need to have consent and preserve “the autonomy of the ‘target’,” see Smith, Michael Joseph, “Ethics and Intervention,” Ethics & International Affairs 3 (1989), 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 See Best, Geoffrey, Humanity in Warfare (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980)Google Scholar; Cohen, Sheldon M., Arms and Judgment: Law, Morality, and the Conduct of Warfare in the Twentieth Century (Boulder: Westview, 1989)Google Scholar; and McCoubrey, Hilaire and White, Nigel D., International Law and Armed Conflict (Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth, 1992)Google Scholar.

44 The classic text is Lauterpacht, Hersch, Recognition in International Law (Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press, 1947)Google Scholar. See also Crawford, James, The Creation of States in International Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979Google Scholar).

45 See Chopra, Jarat and Weiss, Thomas G., “Sovereignty Is No Longer Sacrosanct,” Ethics & International Affairs 6 (1992), 95–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 See Biersteker, Thomas and Weber, Cynthia, eds., State Sovereignty as Social Construct (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Indeed, when scholars defend the principle of nonintervention, they elucidate the positive aspect of sovereignty. See, for example, Walzer, Michael, “The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics,” in Beitz, Charles et al. , eds., International Ethics: A Philosophy and Public Affairs Reader (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985), 217–37Google Scholar.

48 See Nardin, Terry, Law, Morality, and the Relations of States (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983Google Scholar).

49 See, for example, June Axinn and Levin, Herman, Social Welfare: A History of the American Response to Need (New York: Longman, 1992Google Scholar).

50 See Mandelbaum, Michael, “Foreign Policy as Social Work,” Foreign Affairs 75 (1996), 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 For a discussion about living up to the responsibilities of sovereignty with particular reference to IDPs, see Deng, Francis M., “Frontiers of Sovereignty,” Leiden Journal of International Law 8 (1995), 249–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 For a psychological description of the processes that lead to international human rights advocacy and the concern for those outside one's own domestic polity, see Jennings, Todd E., “The Developmental Dialectic of International Human Rights Advocacy,” Political Psychology 17 (March 1996), 77–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 See John Prendergast and Colin Scott, Aid with Integrity: Avoiding the Potential of Humanitarian Aid to Sustain Conflict; A Strategy for USAID/BHR/OFDA in Complex Emergencies, draft manuscript (Center of Concern, Washington DC March 1996)Google Scholar.

54 Anderson, Mary B., Do No Harm: Supporting Local Capacities for Peace through Aid (Cambridge, MA: Collaborative for Development Action, 1996)Google Scholar.

55 See Forsythe, David P., The Internationalization of Human Rights (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1991)Google Scholar; Donnelly, Jack, Universal Human Rights (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989)Google Scholar; and Charney, Jonathan I., “Universal International Law,” American Journal of International Law 87 (October 1993), 529–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 See Arendt, Hannah, “Peace or Armistice in the Near East,” in Feldman, Ron, ed., The Jew as Pariah (New York: Grove Press, 1978), 193–224Google Scholar. See also Isaac, Jeffrey C., “A New Guarantee on Earth,” American Political Science Review 90 (March 1996), 61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 Sadako, Ogata, “Opening Address,” in Healing the Wounds: Refugees, Reconstruction and Reconciliation (New York: International Peace Academy, 1996), 5Google Scholar.

58 For discussions of this phenomenon, see Rotberg, Robert I. and Weiss, Thomas G., eds., From Massacres to Genocide: The Media, Public Policy, and Humanitarian Crises (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1996)Google Scholar; Minear, Larry, Scott, Colin, and Weiss, Thomas G., The News Media, Civil War, and Humanitarian Action (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1996)Google Scholar; Girardet, Edward, ed., Somalia, Rwanda, and Beyond: The Role of the International Media in Wars and Humanitarian Crises, Crosslines Special Report 1 (Dublin: Crosslines Communications Ltd., 1995)Google Scholar; Newman, Johanna, Lights, Camera, War (New York: St. Martin's, 1996)Google Scholar; and Gowing, Nik, Real-Time Television Coverage of Armed Conflicts and Diplomatic Crises (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Shorenstein Center, 1994Google Scholar).

59 Kennan, George, “On American Principles,” Foreign Affairs 74 (1995), 116–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quote at 124.

60 See Weiss, Thomas G., “Collective Spinelessness: U.N. Actions in the Former Yugoslavia,” in Ullman, , ed., The World and Yugoslavia's Wars, 59–96Google Scholar.

61 The role of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia as an agent of the international community in the reconciliation process may imply a more lasting commitment to the peoples who were rescued. See Albright, Madeleine K., “Bosnia in Light of the Holocaust: War Crimes Tribunals,” U.S. Department of State Dispatch 5 (April 18, 1994), 209–12Google Scholar. For a more skeptical view, see Thornberry, “Save the War Crimes Tribunal.”

62 Weiss, Thomas G., “Triage: Humanitarian Interventions in a New Era,” World Policy Journal 11, (Spring 1994), 1–10Google Scholar.

63 See Roberts, Adam, “Humanitarian War: Military Intervention and Human Rights,” International Affairs 69 (1993), 429–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 For a straightforward realist perspective, see Mearsheimer, John J., “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security (Winter 1994–95), 5–49Google Scholar.

65 See “Pursuing Balkan Peace,” OMRI Special Report 1 (November 12, 1996)Google Scholar.