Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T16:58:56.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Twofold mixing implies threefold mixing for rank one transformations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Steven Arthur Kalikow
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper addresses the following long-standing open question: If a stationary transformation on a probability space obeys the property

for all measurable sets A1, A2, does it follow that

for all measurable sets A1, A2, A3? Here we answer the question affirmatively for a certain class of transformations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

References

REFERENCES

[1]Halmos, P. R.. Lectures on Ergodic Theory. Chelsea Publishing Co: New York, (1956).Google Scholar
[2]Rohlin, V. A.. On endomorphisms of compact commutative groups. Izv. Acad. Nauk. SSSR, 13 (1949), 329340. (In Russian.)Google Scholar