Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:30:34.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infinitesimal Lyapunov functions, invariant cone families and stochastic properties of smooth dyanmical systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Anatole Katok  and
Keith Burns
Anatole Katok
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Keith Burns
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We establish general criteria for ergodicity and Bernoulliness for volume preserving diffeormorphisms and flows on compact manifolds. We prove that every ergodic component with non-zero Lyapunov exponents of a contact flow is Bernoulli. As an application of our general results, we construct on every compact 3-dimensional manifold a C∞ Riemannian metric whose geodesic flow is Bernoulli.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 757 - 785
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[A]Anosov, D.V.. Geodesic flows on closed Riemannian manifolds of negative curvature. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 90 (1967), 1–235.Google Scholar
[BG1]Burns, K. and Gerber, M.. Continuous cone families and ergodicity of flows in dimension three. 9 Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. (1989), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[BG2]Burns, K. and Gerber, M.. Real analytic Bernoulli geodesic flows on S 2. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 9 (1989) 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[BG3]Burns, K. and Gerber, M.. Real analytic Bernoulli geodesic flows on product manifolds with low dimensional factors. J. Reine Ang. Math. To appear.Google Scholar
[BS]Bunimovich, L. and Sinai, Ya.. On a basic theorem of the theory of dissipative billiards. Mat. Sb. 90 (1973), 415–431.Google Scholar
[CS]Chernov, N. and Sinai, Ya.. Ergodic properties of some systems of 2-D discs and 3-D spheres. Usp. Mat. Nauk. 42 (1987), 153–174.Google Scholar
[G]Gerber, M.. Conditional stability and real analytic pseudo-Anosov maps. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 321 (1985) 1–116.Google Scholar
[GK]Gerber, M. and Katok, A.. Smooth models of Thurston's pseudo-Anosov maps. Ann. Scient. Éc. Norm. Sup. 15 (1982), 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[H]Hopf, E.. Statistik der geodä tischen Linien in Mannigfaltigkeiten negativer Krümmung. Ber. Verh. Sächs. Akad. Wiss. Leipzig Math. Phys. 91 (1939), 261–304.Google Scholar
[K]Katok, A.. Bernoulli diffeomorphisms on surfaces. Ann. Math. 110 (1979), 529–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[KM1]Katok, A. and Mendoza, L.. Smooth Ergodic Theory. Unpublished notes.Google Scholar
[KM2]Katok, A. and Mendoza, L.. Dynamical systems with non-uniformly hyperbolic behavior. Supplement to A. Katok and B. Hasselblatt. Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1994. pp 649–700.Google Scholar
[KS]Katok, A. and Strelcyn, J. M.. Invariant Manifolds, Entropy and Billiards; Smooth Maps with Singularities. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1222. Springer: New York, 1986. pp 1–283.Google Scholar
[KSS1]Krámli, A., Simányi, N. and Szász, D.. Ergodic properties of semi-dispersing billiards: I. Two cylindric scatterers in the 3D torus. Nonlinearity 2 (1989), 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[KSS2]Krámli, A., Simányi, N. and Szász, D.. The K-property of three billiard balls. Ann. Math. 73 (1991), 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[LI]Lewowicz, J.. Lyapunov functions and topological stability. J. Diff. Eq. 38 (1980), 192–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[L2]Lewowicz, J.. Lyapunov functions and stability of geodesic flows. In Geometric Dynamics. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1007. ed. Palis, J.. Springer: New York, 1981. pp 463–479.Google Scholar
[LW]Liverani, C. and Wojtkowski, M. P.. Ergodicity in Hamiltonian systems. Dynamics Reported. To appear.Google Scholar
[Ma]Markarian, R.. Non uniform hyperbolic billiards. Preprint.Google Scholar
[Mo]Morgan, J. W.. On Thurston's uniformization theorem for three dimensional manifolds. The Smith Conjecture, eds, Morgan, J.W. and Bass, H.. Academic: New York, 1985. pp 37–125.Google Scholar
[My]Myers, R.. Simple knots in compact, orientable 3-manifolds. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 273 (1982), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[O]Osceledets, V.I.. A multiplicative ergodic theorem: characteristic exponents of dynamical systems Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 19 (1968), 197–231.Google Scholar
[P1]Pesin, Ya.B.. Families of invariant manifolds corresponding to nonzero characteristic exponents. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 40 (1975), 1332–1379;Google Scholar
English trans. Math. USSR Izvestija 10 (1976), 1261–1305.Google Scholar
[P2]Pesin, Ya.B.. Characteristic Lyapunov exponents and smooth ergodic theory. Usp. Mat. Nauk 32:4 (1977), 55–112:Google Scholar
English transl. Russian Math. Surv. 32:4 (1977), 55–114.Google Scholar
[P3]Pesin, Ya.B.. Geodesic flows on closed Riemannian manifolds without focal points. Izv. Akad Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 41 (1977), 1252–1288;Google Scholar
English transl. Math USSR Izvestija 11 (1977), 1195–1228.Google Scholar
[PS]Pugh, C. and Shub, M.. Ergodic attractors. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 312 (1989), 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Th]Thurston, W.P.. Three dimensional manifolds, Kleinian groups and hyperbolic geometry. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 (1982), 357–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[To]Tollefson, J.L.. Involutions of sufficiently large 3-manifolds. Topology 20 (1981), 323–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[W]Wojtkowski, M.. Invariant families of cones and Lyapunov exponents. Ergod. Th. and Dynam. Sys. 5 (1985), 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar