Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:44:59.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

α-equivalence: a refinement of Kakutani equivalence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Adam Fieldsteel
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Wesleyan University, Middleton, CT 06475, USA
Andrés Del Junco
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada
Daniel J. Rudolph
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

Abstract

For a fixed irrational α > 0 we say that probability measure-preserving transformations S and T are α-equivalent if they can be realized as cross-sections in a common flow such that the return time functions on the cross-sections both take values in {1, 1 +α} and have equal integrals. Similarly we call two flows F and G α-equivalent if F has a cross-section S and G has a cross-section T isomorphic to S and again both the return time functions take values in {1, 1 + α} and have equal integrals. The integer kα(S), equal to the least positive such such that exp2πikα-1 belongs to the point spectrum of S, is an invariant of α-equivalence.

We obtain a characterization of a-equivalence as a particular type of restricted orbit equivalence and use this to prove that within the class of loosely Bernoulli maps ka(S) together with the entropy h(S) are complete invariants of α-equivalence. There is a corresponding a-equivalence theorem for flows which has as a consequence, for example, that up to an obvious entropy restriction, any weakly mixing cross-section of a loosely Bernoulli flow can also be realized as a cross-section with a {1,1 + α}-valued return time function.

For the proof of the α-equivalence theorem we develop a relative Kakutani equivalence theorem for compact group extensions which is of interest in its own right. Finally, an example of Fieldsteel and Rudolph is used to show that in general kα(S) is not a complete invariant of α-equivalence within a given even Kakutani equivalence class.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[F1]Fieldsteel, A.. A topological formulation of restricted orbital equivalence. Preprint.Google Scholar
[F2]Fieldsteel, A.. Factor orbit equivalence of compact group extensions. Israel J. Math. 38 (1981), 289303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[FR]Fieldsteel, A. & Rudolph, D.. An ergodic transformation with trivial Kakutani centralizer. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 12 (1992), 459478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[JR1]del Junco, A. & Rudolph, D.. Kakutani equivalence of ergodic ℤn-actions. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 4 (1984), 89104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[JR2]del Junco, A. & Rudolph, D.. Residual behavior of induced maps. Preprint.Google Scholar
[JR3]del Junco, A. & Rudolph, D.. On ergodic actions whose self-joinings are graphs. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 7 (1987), 531557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[ORW]Ornstein, D., Rudolph, D. & Weiss, B.. Equivalence of measure-preserving transformations. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 37 (1982), 262.Google Scholar
[P1]Park, K..Google Scholar
[R1]Rudolph, D.. Classifying the isometric extensions of a Bernoulli shift. J. d'Analyse Math. 34 (1978), 3659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[R2]Rudolph, D.. An isomorphism theory for Bernoulli free -skew-compact group actions. Adv. Math. 47 (1983), 241257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[R3]Rudolph, D.. Restricted orbit equivalence. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 54 (1985), 323.Google Scholar
[R4]Rudolph, D.. A two-valued step coding for ergodic flows. Math. Zeitschrift 150 (1976), 201220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[R5]Rudolph, D.. Inner and barely linear time changes of ergodic -actions. Contemp. Math., Conf. in Mod. Anal, and Prob. 26 (1984), 351372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Z]Zimmer, R. J.. Ergodic actions with generalized discrete spectrum. Illinois J. Math. (1976), 555588.Google Scholar