Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:37:03.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A complex Ruelle-Perron-Frobenius theorem and two counterexamples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Mark Pollicott
Mark Pollicott
Affiliation:
Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper a new proof of a theorem of Ruelle about real Perron-Frobenius type operators is given. This theorem is then extended to complex Perron-Frobenius type operators in analogy with Wielandt's theorem for matrices. Finally two questions raised by Ruelle and Bowen concerning analyticity properties of zeta functions for flows are answered.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 135 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bowen, R.. On Axiom A Diffeomorphisms. Am. Math. Soc. Regional Conf. Proc. No. 35, 1978.Google Scholar
[2]Corduneanu, C.. Almost Periodic Functions. Interscience: New York, 1968.Google Scholar
[3]Dunford, N. & Schwartz, J. T.. Linear Operators, Part I. Interscience: New York, 1958.Google Scholar
[4]Ferrero, P. & Schmitt, B.. Ruelle's Perron-Frobenius theorem and projective metrics. Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai 27 (1979), 333–336.Google Scholar
[5]Gallovotti, G.. Funzioni zeta ed insiemi basilar. Accad. Lincei. Rend. Sc. fismat. e nat. 61 (1976), 309–317.Google Scholar
[6]Gantmacher, F. R.. The Theory of Matrices, vol. II. Chelsea: New York, 1974.Google Scholar
[7]Hofbauer, F.. Examples of the non-uniqueness of the equilibrium state. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 228 (1977), 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Jessen, B. & Tornhave, H.. Mean motions and almost periodic functions. Acta Math. 77 (1945), 137–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Krasnoselskii, M.. Positive Solutions of Operator Equations. P. Noordhoff: Groningen, 1964.Google Scholar
[10]Livsic, A. N.. Cohomology of dynamic systems. Math. USSR Izvestiza 6 (1972), 1276–1301.Google Scholar
[11]Parry, W.. Bowen's equidistribution theory and the Dirichlet density theorem. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 4 (1984), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Parry, W. & Pollicott, M.. An analogue of the prime number theorem for closed orbits of Axiom A flows. Annals of Math. 118 (1983), 573–591.Google Scholar
[13]Parry, W. & Schmidt, K.. Natural coefficients and invariants for Markov shifts. Invent. Math. 76 (1984), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Parry, W. & Tuncel, S.. Classification Problems in Ergodic Theory. London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes 67. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Ruelle, D.. Statistical mechanics of a one-dimensional lattice gas. Commun. Math. Phys. 9 (1968), 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Ruelle, D.. Generalised zeta functions for Axiom A basic sets. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 82 (1976), 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Ruelle, D.. Thermodynamic Formalism. Addison-Wesley: Reading, 1978.Google Scholar
[18]Ruelle, D.. Flows which do not exponentially mix. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 296 Série I, No. 4 (1983), 191–194.Google Scholar
[19]Taylor, A. E.. An Introduction to Functional Analysis. Wiley: New York, 1964.Google Scholar
[20]Walters, P.. Ruelle's operator theorem and g-measures. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 214 (1975), 375–387.Google Scholar
[21]Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory. Graduate Texts in Maths. 79. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg-Berlin-New York, 1981.Google Scholar