Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:38:49.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combined structural and topological stability are equivalent to Axiom A and the strong transversality condition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Mike Hurley
Mike Hurley
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of this paper is to develop necessary conditions for a diffeomorphism to be topologically stable (lower semistable). Our results combine with a recent theorem of R. Mañé and with earlier results of J. Robbin, C. Robinson, and Z. Nitecki to give a complete characterization of diffeomorphisms of compact manifolds that are both topologically and structurally stable: they are precisely the Axiom A diffeomorphisms that satisfy the strong transversality condition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 81 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bowen, R.. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, #470. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1975.Google Scholar
[2]Fleming, P. & Hurley, M.. A converse topological stability theorem for flows on surfaces. J. Differential Equations. To appear.Google Scholar
[3]Franke, J. & Selgrade, J.. Hyperbolicity and chain recurrence. J. Differential Equations 26 (1977), 27–36.Google Scholar
[4]Franks, J.. Absolutely structurally stable diffeomorphisms. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 37 (1973), 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Franks, J.. Time dependent stable diffeomorphisms. Invent. Math. 24 (1974), 163–172.Google Scholar
[6]Guckenheimer, J.. Absolutely Ω-stable diffeomorphisms. Topology 11 (1972), 195–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Hurley, M.. Consequences of topological stability. J. Differential Equations. To appear.Google Scholar
[8]Mañé, R.. An ergodic closing lemma. Ann. of Math. 116 (1982), 503–540.Google Scholar
[9]Nitecki, Z.. On semistability for diffeomorphisms. Invent. Math. 14 (1971), 83–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Palis, J. & Smale, S.. Structural stability theorems. In Global Analysis (Proc. Symp. Pure Math., vol. XIV) (1970), 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Robbin, J.. A structural stability theorem. Ann. of Math. 94 (1971), 447–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Robinson, C.. Cr structural stability implies Kupka—Smale. In Dynamical Systems (ed. Peixoto, M.). Academic Press, 1973, 443–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Robinson, C.. Structural stability of C 1 diffeomorphisms. J. Differential Equations 22 (1976), 28–73.Google Scholar
[14]Shub, M.. Structurally stable diffeomorphisms are dense. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 78 (1972), 817–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Takens, F.. On Zeeman's tolerance stability conjecture. Manifolds—Amsterdam 1970. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, #197. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1971, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Walters, P.. Anosov diffeomorphisms are topologically stable. Topology 9 (1970), 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Yano, K.. Topologically stable homeomorphisms of the circle. Nagoya Math. J. 79 (1980), 145–149.Google Scholar