Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:51:58.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sufficient conditions under which a transitive system is chaotic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2009

E. AKIN ,
E. GLASNER ,
W. HUANG ,
S. SHAO  and
X. YE
E. AKIN
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, The City College, 137 Street and Convent Avenue, New York City, NY 10031, USA (email: [email protected])
E. GLASNER
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (email: [email protected], [email protected])
W. HUANG
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, P.R. China (email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
S. SHAO
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, P.R. China (email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
X. YE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, P.R. China (email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let (X,T) be a topologically transitive dynamical system. We show that if there is a subsystem (Y,T) of (X,T) such that (X×Y,T×T) is transitive, then (X,T) is strongly chaotic in the sense of Li and Yorke. We then show that many of the known sufficient conditions in the literature, as well as a few new results, are corollaries of this statement. In fact, the kind of chaotic behavior we deduce in these results is a much stronger variant of Li–Yorke chaos which we call uniform chaos. For minimal systems we show, among other results, that uniform chaos is preserved by extensions and that a minimal system which is not uniformly chaotic is PI.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 30 , Issue 5 , October 2010 , pp. 1277 - 1310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Akin, E.. On chain continuity. Discrete Contin. Dynam. Syst. 2(1) (1996), 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Akin, E.. Recurrence in Topological Dynamical Systems: Furstenberg Families and Ellis Actions. Plenum, New York, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Akin, E.. Lectures on Cantor and Mycielski sets for dynamical systems. Chapel Hill Ergodic Theory Workshops (Contemporary Mathematics, 356). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004, pp. 21–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Akin, E., Auslander, J. and Berg, K.. When is a transitive map chaotic?. Convergence in Ergodic Theory and Probability (Columbus, OH, 1993) (Ohio State University Mathematical Research Institute Publications, 5). de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996, pp. 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Akin, E., Auslander, J. and Glasner, E.. The topological dynamics of Ellis actions. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 195(913) (2008).Google Scholar
[6]Akin, E. and Glasner, E.. Residual properties and almost equicontinuity. J. Anal. Math. 84 (2001), 243–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Auslander, J.. Minimal Flows and their Extensions (North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 153). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
[8]Auslander, J. and Yorke, J.. Interval maps, factors of maps and chaos. Tohoku Math. J. 32 (1980), 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Banks, J., Brooks, J., Cairns, G., Davis, G. and Stacey, P.. On Devaney’s definition of chaos. Amer. Math. Monthly 99 (1992), 332–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Blanchard, F., Glasner, E., Kolyada, S. and Maass, A.. On Li–Yorke pairs. J. Reine Angew. Math. 547 (2002), 51–68.Google Scholar
[11]Blanchard, F., Host, B. and Maass, A.. Topological complexity. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 20 (2000), 641–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Blanchard, F., Huang, W. and Snoha, L.. Topological size of scrambled sets. Colloq. Math. 110 (2008), 293–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Bronstein, I. U.. Extensions of Minimal Transformation Groups. Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Ellis, R., Glasner, S. and Shapiro, L.. Proximal-isometric flows. Adv. Math. 17 (1975), 213–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Devaney, R.. Chaotic Dynamical Systems, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
[16]Furstenberg, H.. The structure of distal flows. Amer. J. Math. 85 (1963), 477–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Furstenberg, H.. Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets, and a problem in Diophantine approximation. Math. Syst. Theory 1 (1967), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Ellis, R.. The Veech structure theorem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 186 (1973), 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Glasner, E.. Proximal Flows (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 517). Springer, Berlin, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Glasner, E.. Ergodic Theory via Joinings (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 101). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Glasner, E.. Topological weak mixing and quasi-Bohr systems. Probability in mathematics. Israel J. Math. 148 (2005), 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Glasner, E. and Maon, D.. Rigidity in topological dynamics. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 9 (1989), 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Glasner, E. and Weiss, B.. On the construction of minimal skew-products. Israel J. Math. 34 (1979), 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Glasner, E. and Weiss, B.. Sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Nonlinearity 6 (1993), 1067–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Glasner, E. and Ye, X.. Local entropy theory. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 29 (2009), 321–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Huang, W., Lu, P. and Ye, X.. Measure-theoretical sensitivity and equicontinuity. Israel J. Math. 148 (2005), 277–304.Google Scholar
[27]Huang, W. and Ye, X. D.. Devaney’s chaos or 2-scattering implies Li–Yorke’s chaos. Topology Appl. 117 (2002), 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28]Huang, W. and Ye, X.. Topological complexity, return times and weak disjointness. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 24 (2004), 825–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29]Iwanik, A.. Independent sets of transitive points. Dynamical Systems and Ergodic Theory (Banach Center Publications, 23). PWN, Warsaw, 1989, pp. 277–282.Google Scholar
[30]Kerr, D. and Li, H.. Independence in topological and C *-dynamics. Math. Ann. 338 (2007), 869–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31]Kuratowski, K.. Applications of the Baire-category method to the problem of independent sets. Fund. Math. 81 (1973), 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32]Li, T. Y. and Yorke, J. A.. Period three implies chaos. Amer. Math. Monthly 82 (1975), 985–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33]Mai, J. H.. Devaney’s Chaos implies existence of s-scrambled sets. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 132 (2004), 2761–2767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[34]Marczewski, E.. Independence and homomorphisms in abstract algebra. Fund. Math. 50 (1961), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[35]Markley, N. and Paul, G. M. E.. Almost automorphic symbolic minimal sets without unique ergodicity. Israel J. Math. 34 (1979/1980), 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[36]McMahon, D. C.. Weak mixing and a note on a structure theorem for minimal transformation groups. Illinois J. Math. 20 (1976), 186–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[37]Mycielski, J.. Independent sets in topological algebras. Fund. Math. 55 (1964), 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[38]Veech, W. A.. Point-distal flows. Amer. J. Math. 92 (1970), 205–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[39]Veech, W. A.. Topological dynamics. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 (1977), 775–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[40]Williams, S.. Toeplitz minimal flows which are not uniquely ergodic. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 67 (1984), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[41]van der Woude, J.. Topological dynamics. Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 1982. CWI Tract, 22.Google Scholar
[42]van der Woude, J.. Characterizations of (H)PI extensions. Pacific J. Math. 120 (1985), 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[43]Ye, X. and Zhang, R. F.. On sensitive sets in topological dynamics. Nonlinearity 21 (2008), 1601–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar