Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T13:11:36.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Only rational homology spheres admit Ω(f) to be union of DE attractors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2009

FAN DING
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China (email: [email protected], [email protected])
JIANZHONG PAN
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, HLM, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of China (email: [email protected])
SHICHENG WANG
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China (email: [email protected], [email protected])
JIANGANG YAO
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California at Berkeley, CA 94720, USA (email: [email protected])

Abstract

If there exists a diffeomorphism f on a closed, orientable n-manifold M such that the non-wandering set Ω(f) consists of finitely many orientable ( ±) attractors derived from expanding maps, then M is a rational homology sphere; moreover all those attractors are of topological dimension n−2. Expanding maps are expanding on (co)homologies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Auslander, A. L.. Bieberbach’s theorems on space groups and discrete uniform subgroups of Lie groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 71 (1960), 579590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Chevalley, C. and Eilenberg, S.. Cohomology theory of Lie groups and Lie algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 63 (1948), 85124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Epstein, D. and Shub, M.. Expanding endomorphisms of flat manifolds. Topology 7 (1968), 139141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Franks, J. and Williams, B.. Anomalous Anosov flows. Global Theory of Dynamical Systems (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 819). Springer, Berlin, 1980, pp. 158174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Gromov, M.. Groups of polynomial growth and expanding maps. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 53 (1981), 5373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Hilton, P. J. and Stammbach, U.. A Course in Homological Algebra (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 4). Springer, Berlin, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Jiang, B. J., Ni, Y. and Wang, S. C.. 3-manifolds that admit knotted solenoids as attractors. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356 (2004), 43714382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Jiang, B., Wang, S. and Zheng, H.. No embeddings of solenoids into surfaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 136(10) (2008), 36973700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Mather, J.. Characterization of Anosov diffeomorphisms. Indag. Math. 30(5) (1968), 479483, also as Nederl. Akad. van Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 71(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Nomizu, K.. On the cohomology of compact homogeneous spaces of nilpotent Lie groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 59 (1954), 531538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Shub, M.. Endomorphisms of compact differentiable manifolds. Amer. J. Math. 91 (1969), 175199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Shub, M.. Expanding maps. Global Analysis (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, XIV). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1970, pp. 273276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Smale, S.. Differentiable dynamical systems. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967), 747817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Spanier, E. H.. Algebraic Topology. Springer, Berlin, 1966.Google Scholar
[15]Vietoris, L.. Über den höheren Zusammenhang kompakter Räume und eine Klasse von zusammenhangstreuen Abbildungen. Math. Ann. 97(1) (1927), 454472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Wang, S. C. and Zhou, Q.. Any 3-manifold 1-dominates at most finitely many geometric 3-manifolds. Math. Ann. 322(3) (2002), 525535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar