Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:26:24.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence of sorbitol non-fermenting Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in Black Bengal goats on smallholdings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2016

M. DAS GUPTA
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Veterinary Public Health, Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Bangladesh
A. DAS
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Bangladesh
M. Z. ISLAM
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Veterinary Public Health, Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Bangladesh
P. K. BISWAS*
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Veterinary Public Health, Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Bangladesh
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr P. K. Biswas, Department of Microbiology and Veterinary Public Health, Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Bangladesh. (Email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A cross-sectional survey was carried out in Bangladesh with the sampling of 514 Black Bengal goats on smallholdings to determine the presence of sorbitol non-fermenting (SNF) Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC). Swab samples collected from the recto-anal junction were plated onto cefixime and potassium tellurite added sorbitol MacConkey (CT-SMAC) agar, a selective medium for STEC O157 serogroup, where this serogroup and other SNF STEC produce colourless colonies. The SNF E. coli (SNF EC) isolates obtained from the survey were investigated by PCR for the presence of Shiga toxin-producing genes, stx1 and stx2, and two other virulence genes, eae and hlyA that code for adherence factor (intimin protein) and pore-forming cytolysin, respectively. The SNF EC isolates were also assessed for the presence of the rfbO157 gene to verify their identity to O157 serogroup. The results revealed that the proportions of goats carrying SNF EC isolates and stx1 and stx2 genes were 6·2% (32/514) [95% confidence interval (CI) 4·4–8·7)], 1·2% (95% CI 0·5–2·6) and 1·2% (95% CI 0·5–2·6), respectively. All the SNF STEC tested negative for rfbO157, hlyA and eae genes. The risk for transmission of STEC from Black Bengal goats to humans is low.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

INTRODUCTION

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are important human pathogens. STEC including serotype O157:H7 and other non-O157 serogroups cause serious illness, such as haemorrhagic colitis (HC) and haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS), as well as death in humans [Reference James1]. The pathogenicity of STEC is chiefly mediated through the Shiga toxins (stx1 or stx2 or their variants) encoded by the stx1 and stx2 genes [Reference Paton and Paton2]. Besides the stx gene(s), human pathogenic STEC strains often carry the eae gene, encoding the adherence factor, i.e. the ‘intimin’ protein, which is involved in the intimate adhesion of bacteria to enterocytes, with the production of attaching and effacing lesions [Reference Kaper3]. STEC strains may also harbour a large plasmid encoding additional virulence factors, such as the haemolysin (hly) gene, which acts as a pore-forming cytolysin on eukaryotic cells [Reference Schmidt, Beutin and Karch4].

Although healthy cattle are the widely studied natural reservoir for STEC, other domestic ruminants, mainly sheep and goats, have also been reported as asymptomatic carriers for STEC, and thus they might play an important role in human infections [Reference Ferens and Hovde5]. STEC O157:H7 is the most prevalent serotype causing human infections worldwide, and based on sorbitol-non fermentation property its presence in faecal samples could be primarily screened on a selective medium sorbitol MacConkey agar supplemented with cefixime and potassium tellurite (CT-SMAC). Recently, sorbitol non-fermenting (SNF) STEC was, for the first time, reported in cattle on smallholdings in Bangladesh [Reference Islam, Christensen and Biswas6]. However, Black Bengal goats, reared on smallholdings, particularly in Bangladesh and India have seemingly not been studied for the presence of this important zoonotic pathogen.

Goats represent the fourth largest livestock group in the world [Reference Aziz7]. Of about 860 million goats reared worldwide 18 million are in Bangladesh [Reference Aziz7] and >90% of them are of the Black Bengal breed [Reference Amin, Hussain and Islam8], reared mainly by landless, small-scale farmers primarily for meat [9]. The mean number of goats per smallholding in Bangladesh is 2·3 [9] and this small ruminant plays an important role in the rural economy of Bangladesh and parts of India. This breed is considerably disease-tolerant, but its role in harbouring STEC and its dispersion to human food and water sources have never been studied.

SNF STEC displays delayed (negative) fermentation of d-sorbitol, and is therefore commonly isolated by growing on CT-SMAC [Reference Chapman10, Reference Zadik, Chapman and Siddons11]. In addition, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay provides a satisfactory sensitivity for identification of virulence gene(s) from SNF isolates [Reference Wang12]. Here, we describe the proportions of Black Bengal goats in smallholdings carrying SNF Escherichia coli (SNF EC), SNF STEC and the presence of two other virulence genes, eae and hlyA in the SNF EC strains isolated from them.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Black Bengal goats

The Black Bengal goat is a dwarf-type, highly prolific breed of goat [13]. Although the predominant coat colour is black, brown, grey and white are also seen. Castrated males aged 1 year and females of the same age weigh about 16 kg and 12 kg, respectively. Both sexes have cylindrical horns, and beards at older ages. Sexual maturity is attained at 6–8 months, and they reproduce twice a year even with a low level of nutrition: the average litter size is 2·2 [13]. These animals are considerably disease tolerant [13].

Study population and sample collection

We performed a cross-sectional prevalence study using multi-stage sampling. For sampling, we selected one of the six divisions of Bangladesh – Chittagong. The hierarchical stratum for sampling included two districts – Chittagong and Noakhali; within these districts five sub-districts (locally known as upazilas) were chosen; within these sub-districts were 13 primary sampling points (villages). From these primary sampling points 514 Black Bengal goats were sampled from June 2011 to June 2012. Because the aim of the study was to examine the proportion of Black Bengal goats in smallholdings carrying SNF STEC, and because the rearing system and management of Black Bengal goats in smallholdings is the same across the country, the sampling division mentioned above was conveniently selected. However, the primary sampling unit(s) [village(s) under a sub-district)] were selected based on the information provided from the corresponding Upazila Livestock Office on village(s) where a significant section of villagers reared Black Bengal goats. In order to increase the representativeness of the sample we sampled 13 villages located in five different sub-districts.

To the authors' knowledge there is no published report on the proportion of live Black Bengal goats positive for STEC. However, Islam et al. [Reference Islam14] reported that its proportion in slaughtered goats, irrespective of breed, could be 10%. With this proportion, the minimum number of goats required for sampling was 258 with 90% power at the 5% level of significance [Reference Kirkwood and Sterne15]. However, we sampled 514 goats, with at least 25 from each sampling point.

The samples were collected from the recto-anal junction using sterile swabs which were placed in a 5 ml tube containing buffered peptone water (Oxoid, UK). The samples were transported immediately to the Microbiology Laboratory, Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Bangladesh. In addition, we collected demographic information on the animals sampled.

Culture and STEC isolation

A SNF EC isolate was primarily detected based on their sorbitol non-fermentation (colourless colonies) using a selective medium (CT-SMAC agar; Oxoid). Each sample was inoculated on CT-SMAC agar and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. For enrichment, at least five colourless colonies from CT-SMAC agar were inoculated onto tryptic soy broth (TSB), incubated at 37 °C for 6 h in a shaker incubator. Growths from TSB were subcultured on CT-SMAC agar again and five cross-sectional colonies from homogenous colourless growth in secondary culture [Reference Islam, Christensen and Biswas6] were inoculated onto Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB, Oxoid) agar plates to look for the characteristic metallic green sheen produced by E. coli. Isolates with a metallic green sheen were confirmed as E. coli and preserved at −80 °C in LB broth with 15% glycerin until assessment for virulence genes. A representative number of these isolates were further tested for the presence of seven housekeeping genes of E. coli: adk, mdh, purA, gyrb, icd, recA and fumC, by PCR using the recommended primers and the protocol available at http://mlst.warwick.ac.uk/mlst/dbs/Ecoli/documents/primersColi_html.

Detection of Shiga toxin-producing genes (stx1 and stx2) and two other virulence genes (eae and hlyA)

All the SNF EC isolates were first assessed for the presence of the rfbO157 gene to verify whether they belonged to the O157 serogroup, and then for stx1, stx2, eae and hlyA genes, by PCR. Oligonucleotide primers used to detect these five genes and their predicted product sizes are given in Table 1. Each SNF EC isolate was grown in 5% citrated bovine blood agar, and DNA was extracted using a boiling method described by Sánchez et al. [Reference Sánchez20]. Briefly, one loopful of colonies of each isolate was suspended in 0·5 ml deionized water, boiled for 5 min to release DNA, and the boiled suspension was centrifuged. The supernatant was used as DNA template in PCR reactions. Uniplex PCR was used for detection of each virulence gene. Amplification of bacterial DNA was performed using 50 µl volumes containing 1 µl of the prepared sample supernatant; 1 µl (each) oligonucleotide primer (20 pmol), 5 µl of 20 mm magnesium chloride, 1 µl of 40 µ m dNTPs, 0·2 µl DreamTaq DNA polymerase (0·4 U/µl) (Thermo Scientific, Fermentas International Inc., USA), 1 µl DNA template and 40·8 µl molecular grade water. The conditions for the PCR were 95 °C for 3 min for initial denaturation of DNA followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 20s (denaturation), 58–59 °C for 40s (primer annealing) and 72 °C for 1 min (DNA synthesis) performed on a Thermo-cycler (2720 Thermal cycler, Applied Biosystems, USA). The amplified product for a specific gene was electrophoresed using 10 µl of the final reaction mixture on a 1·5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide (0·5 µg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The DNA fragment of specific sizes was located by a UV transilluminator (BDA digital, Biometra GmbH, Germany). A molecular size marker (O'GeneRuler 1 kb Plus, Thermo Scientific Fermentas) was included in each gel. A SNF STEC strain isolated by Islam et al. [Reference Islam, Christensen and Biswas6] was used as a positive control.

Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in PCR for the detection of five virulent genes rfbO157, stx1, stx2, eae and hlyA

Statistical analysis

The proportion of Black Bengal goats positive for SNF EC or SNF STEC was calculated based on the number of animals found positive with the corresponding type (numerator), divided by the total number of animals sampled (denominator) using Graph Pad software quick calculation for ‘Confidence interval of a proportion by modified Wald method’ (http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/confInterval2/). The 95% confidence interval (CI) of a proportion and significance in the difference of the proportions for SNF EC or SNF STEC in two age groups (adults and kids) and sexes, were assessed by Fisher's exact test using Graph Pad software [21].

RESULTS

Summary of the study population

The summary of the sampling strata in hierarchical order from district to sampling point and the corresponding number of animals sampled and animals carrying SNF STEC are given in Table 2. The number of animals sampled from a sampling point varied from 25 to 94. Of the 514 goats sampled, 367 were adults (>6 months) while 147 were kids (<6 months); 212 were male and 302 were female: 214 goats were from Chittagong (district 1) and 300 from Noakhali (district 2).

Table 2. Sampling strata (hierarchically from district to sampling unit), the corresponding number of sampled Black Bengal goats and animals carrying Shiga toxin-producing sorbitol non-fermenting Escherichia coli (SNF STEC) in the study

District 1, Chittagong; district 2, Noakhali. (There are 64 districts and 482 sub-districts in Bangladesh.)

Proportion of goats carrying SNF EC and SNF STEC

Of the 514 swab samples plated onto CT-SMAC agar, 79 yielded multiple SNF (colourless) colonies interspersed with sorbitol fermenting (SF) pink colonies. Secondary growth by plating cultures through TSB onto CT-SMAC agar yielded 41 pure SNF isolates, of which 32 were finally identified as E. coli.

The results of uniplex PCR showed that no isolate was positive for the rfb gene; however, six were positive for the stx1 gene and six for the stx2 gene. Therefore, the proportion of animals harbouring SNF EC containing stx1 or stx2 genes (i.e. SNF STEC) was 1·2% (6/514) (95% CI 0·5–2·6) and 1·2 % (6/514) (95% CI 0·5–2·6), respectively. None of the isolates carried both genes, and thus, in total, 12 (2·3%, 95% CI 1·3–4·1) goats were positive for SNF STEC. All the 12 SNF STEC isolates were negative for the two other virulence genes (hlyA and eae) tested; however, seven and two isolates (not harbouring stx1 or stx2 genes) were positive for hlyA and eae genes, respectively. PCR results displaying the gene-specific amplicons of some SNF STEC and SNF EC isolates are depicted in Figure 1(ad).

Fig. 1. Results of PCR assay for four virulent genes: stx1, stx2, hlyA and eae. (a) stx1 gene (614 bp) amplicon: lane M = 1 kb plus DNA ladder; lanes 1, 3–7, stx1-positive isolates; (b) stx2 gene (779 bp) amplicon: lane M = 1 kb plus DNA ladder; lanes 1–7, stx2-positive isolates; (c) hlyA gene (165 bp) amplicon: lane M = 1 kb plus DNA ladder; lanes 4, 9–10, hlyA-positive isolates; (d) eae gene (881 bp) amplicon: lane M = 1 kb plus DNA ladder; lane 2, eae-positive isolate.

Because the test sensitivity and specificity were not accounted for in the prevalence calculation, the prevalence estimates for animals carrying SNF STEC either with the stx1 or stx2 genes were their apparent prevalence estimates (proportion of animals that were positive by the diagnostic method), and not the true prevalence estimates. In district 1 (Chittagong) and district 2 (Noakhali) eight and four animals, respectively, tested positive for SNF STEC. Ten adult goats and two kids (<6 months) were positive with SNF STEC (P = 0·352); five were male and seven female (P = 0·976) (Table 3).

Table 3. Distribution of Shiga toxin-producing genes, stx1 and stx2, and two other virulent genes, eae and hlyA, in the 32 sorbitol non-fermenting strains of Escherichia coli isolated from Black Bengal goats in Bangladesh

A, Adult; K, kid; +, presence of the gene; −, absence of the gene.

District 1, Chittagong; district 2, Noakhali.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we report the presence of SNF EC including STEC in Black Bengal goats in Bangladesh. Approximately 6% (4·4–8·7%) and 2% (1·3–4·1%) of the Black Bengal goats in the study area were positive for SNF EC and SNF STEC, respectively, indicating a low proportion of this breed harbouring SNF STEC. Estimation of the confidence intervals did not account for the sampling design (clustering of sampled animals in villages), and, therefore, that confidence intervals are likely to be underestimated. In a previous study, Islam et al. [Reference Islam, Christensen and Biswas6] reported that 8·5% and 5·4% of cattle on smallholdings were positive for SNF EC and SNF STEC, respectively, thus suggesting that the probability of isolation of SNF STEC from Black Bengal goats is nearly half of that from cattle. This lower presence of STEC in goats compared to cattle is corroborated by other studies [Reference Islam14, Reference Nahed, Khaled and Mudar22]. However, a higher prevalence (10%) of STEC in slaughtered goats, irrespective of breed, was reported by Islam et al. [Reference Islam14]. This difference might be linked to differences in the status (dead or alive) of animals sampled, breed and age of goats [Reference Cortés23, Reference Orden24], the procedures used to isolate the organisms, and spread of organism between animals in abattoir. The proportion of Black Bengal goats in the present study that harbuored STEC was lower than reported from goats of other breeds in Southern Jordan (6·4%) [Reference Tarawneh25], England & Wales (6·1%) [Reference Wary, Mclaren and Carrall26], Malaysia (8·14%) [Reference TayZarn27], Spain (16·2%) [Reference Orden28] and India (16·7%) [Reference Wani29]. These differences probably indicate that the carriage proportion of SNF STEC in Black Bengal goats is substantially lower than in other breeds.

The primary isolation based on the production of colourless colonies on CT-SMAC agar revealed that not all the 41 SNF isolates were E. coli or STEC; in fact, 32 of them were found to be E. coli. We did not perform any additional screening to identify the nine SNF isolates that were not E. coli. Simultaneously, the results revealed that identification of SNF STEC based on just observing colourless colonies on CT-SMAC should not be relied upon for goat faecal samples. Additional testing, such as PCR, to detect virulent genes or O-serotyping is required.

Using PCR, all the SNF isolates were negative for the rfb gene, suggesting that they did not belong to the STEC O157 serogroup, a commonly reported serogroup of STEC that causes severe acute human infection. A similar result, i.e. STEC of non-O157 serogroup has been reported by other studies [Reference Nahed, Khaled and Mudar22, Reference Beutin30, Reference Saeed and Ibrahim31]. However, in a previous study [Reference Islam, Christensen and Biswas6], a very low proportion (0·4%) of cattle on smallholdings in Bangladesh was found positive for STEC O157 serogroup. The results of the present study indicate that Black Bengal goats probably do not carry SNF STEC belonging to O157 serogroup or, if carried, the proportion might be very low.

Six of the SNF STEC isolates, i.e. 1·2% of the goat isolates had the stx1 gene alone, in agreement with Roy & Roberts [Reference Roy and Roberts32] and Islam et al. [Reference Islam14]. The proportion of isolates that had the stx2 gene was the same, 1·2%, in agreement with Wani et al. [Reference Wani29], who found that 2·9% of goats in India carried this virulence gene. However, contrasting results for the possession of stx1 or stx2 genes have been reported in previous studies [Reference Orden28, Reference Zschöck33]. These variations in the prevalence of STEC possessing only one kind of Shiga toxin-producing gene might be influenced by different factors including diet, age, environmental conditions and seasonal variations [Reference Kudva, Hatfield and Hovde34].

The proportion of E. coli containing the hlyA gene was 1·4%, which is similar to that reported in cattle in smallholdings [Reference Islam, Christensen and Biswas6], whereas in goats, Islam et al. [Reference Islam14] and Wani et al. [Reference Wani29] reported higher proportions, 7% and 14·7%, in Bangladesh and India, respectively. Only about 0·4% of goats were positive with SNF EC containing the eae gene, a similar finding to that reported by other studies [Reference Islam14, Reference Cortés23, Reference Wani29, Reference Vu-Khac and Cornick35]. Orden et al. [Reference Orden24] reported VTEC isolates without the eae gene from healthy goats, except three E. coli O157 H7 isolates. Taken together, these reports and the results of the present study suggest that very few STEC from Black Bengal goats harbour the eae gene. Louie et al. [Reference Louie36] and Barrett et al. [Reference Barrett37] reported that the eae gene is essential for full virulence expression of STEC in humans. However, Paton et al. [Reference Paton38] reported that the eae gene might be required to produce HC and HUS for a few strains of STEC, but not for others. Therefore, the eae gene-negative STEC of goat origin might also have the potential to cause human infection.

The distributions of goats carrying SNF STEC between the two sampled districts did not differ significantly. Similar husbandry for goats in smallholdings in the two districts might be the reason for this.

In terms of pathogenicity of STEC, the most virulent combination is the possession of both Shiga toxin-producing genes, stx1 and stx2, and the eae gene in the same strain [Reference Ethelberg39, Reference Franz40], which was not detected in the Black Bengal goats sampled. However, any E. coli having a single Shiga toxin-producing gene has the potential to cause human infection [Reference Eklund, Leino and Siitonen41Reference Friedrich43]. Therefore, SNF STEC being harboured in Black Bengal goats, as observed in the present study, might have zoonotic transferability through contaminated food and water, although such an occurrence would seemingly be low compared to cattle in Bangladesh, as observed by Islam et al. [Reference Islam, Christensen and Biswas6].

CONCLUSION

The carriage proportion of SNF EC and SNF STEC in faeces of Black Bengal goats was about 6% and 2%, respectively. SNF EC or SNF STEC can be seen evenly distributed in adult goats and kids, irrespective of sex and geographical location. The presence of STEC strains having both stx1 and stx2 genes and the eae gene might be rare in the Black Bengal goat population. In Bangladesh, the public health threat from STEC in Black Bengal goats is seemingly low compared to that from cattle.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1.James, LS, et al. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Avdances in Applied Microbiology 2014; 85: 145197.Google Scholar
2.Paton, JC, Paton, AW. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1998; 11: 450479.Google Scholar
3.Kaper, JB. The locus of enterocyte effacement pathogenicity island of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other attaching and effacing E. coli. Japanese Journal of Medical Science and Biology 1998; 51: 101107.Google Scholar
4.Schmidt, H, Beutin, L, Karch, H. Molecular analysis of the plasmid-encoded hemolysin of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain EDL 933. Infection and Immunity 1995; 63: 10551061.Google Scholar
5.Ferens, WA, Hovde, CJ. Escherichia coli O157:H7: animal reservoir and sources of human infection. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2011; 8: 465487.Google Scholar
6.Islam, MZ, Christensen, JP, Biswas, PK. Sorbitol non-fermenting shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in cattle on smallholdings. Epidemiology and Infection 2015; 143: 94103.Google Scholar
7.Aziz, MA. Present status of the world goat populations and their productivity. Lohmann Information 2010; 45: 4252.Google Scholar
8.Amin, MR, Hussain, SS, Islam, ABMM. Reproductive peculiarities and litter weight in different genetic groups of black Bengal does. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 2001; 14: 297301.Google Scholar
9.Joint FAO/IAEA programme. Nuclear techniques in food and agriculture (http://www.nawen.iaea.org/nafa/aph/stories/2006-goat-genetic.html). Accessed 20 August 2015.Google Scholar
10.Chapman, PA, et al. An improved selective medium for the isolation of Escherichia coli O157. Journal of Medical Microbiology 1991; 35: 107110.Google Scholar
11.Zadik, PM, Chapman, PA, Siddons, CA. Use of tellurite for the selection of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli O157. Journal of Medical Microbiology 1993; 39: 155158.Google Scholar
12.Wang, F, et al. Current trends in detecting non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in food. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2013; 10: 113.Google Scholar
13.Joint FAO/IAEA programme. Nuclear techniques in food and agriculture (http// www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/aph/stories/2006-black-bengal.html). Accessed 20 August 2015.Google Scholar
14.Islam, MA, et al. Prevalence and genetic characterization of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolates from slaughtered animals in Bangladesh. Applied Environmental Microbiology 2008; 74: 54145421.Google Scholar
15.Kirkwood, BR, Sterne, JAC. Essential Medical Statistics, 2nd edn. Massachusetts: Blackwell Science, 2003, pp. 423428.Google Scholar
16.Desmarchelier, PM, et al. A PCR specific for Escherichia coli O157:H7 based on rfb locus encoding O157 lipopolysaccharide. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1998; 36: 18011804.Google Scholar
17.DesRosiers, A, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Escherichia coli verotoxin-producing isolates from humans and pigs. Journal of Food Protection 2001; 64: 19041911.Google Scholar
18.Manna, SK, et al. Detection of Escherichia coli O157 in foods of animal origin by culture and multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Food Science and Technology 2006; 43: 7779.Google Scholar
19.Oswald, E, et al. Typing of intimin genes in human and animal enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: characterization of a new intimin variant. Infection and Immunity 2000; 68: 6471.Google Scholar
20.Sánchez, S, et al. Variation in the prevalence of non-O157 shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in four sheep flocks during a 12-month longitudinal study. Small Ruminant Research 2010; 93: 144148.Google Scholar
21.Graph Pad Software (http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/contingency). Accessed 20 August 2015.Google Scholar
22.Nahed, HG, Khaled, AAM, Mudar, AM. Are non-O157shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli imposing their predominance over O157 in farm animals and human? Global Veterinaria 2014; 12: 636642.Google Scholar
23.Cortés, C, et al. Serotypes, virulence genes and intimin types of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli and enteropathogenic E. coli isolated from healthy dairy goats in Spain. Veterinary Microbiology 2005; 110: 6776.Google Scholar
24.Orden, JA, et al. A longitudinal study of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli in two dairy goat herds. Veterinary Microbiology 2008; 132: 428434.Google Scholar
25.Tarawneh, KA, et al. Characterization of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VTEC) isolates from faeces of small ruminants and environmental samples in Southern Jordan. Journal of Basic Microbiology 2009; 49: 310317.Google Scholar
26.Wary, C, Mclaren, IM, Carrall, PJ. Escherichia coli isolated from farm animals in England and Wales between 1986 and 1991. Veterinary Record 1993; 13: 439442.Google Scholar
27.TayZarn, AC, et al. Occurrence of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in healthy cattle and goats and distribution of virulence genes among isolates. African Journal Microbiology Research 2013; 7: 17031707.Google Scholar
28.Orden, JA, et al. Prevalence and characterization of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from diarrheic and healthy sheep and goats. Epidemiology and Infection 2003; 130: 313321.Google Scholar
29.Wani, SA, et al. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in healthy goats in India: occurrence and virulence properties. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2006; 100: 108113.Google Scholar
30.Beutin, L, et al. Prevalence and some properties of verotoxin (Shiga-like-toxin)-producing E. coli in seven different species of healthy domestic animals. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993; 31: 24832488.Google Scholar
31.Saeed, AY, Ibrahim, KS. Identification of Escherichia coli O157 in sheep and goats using PCR technique. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 2013; 6: 3032.Google Scholar
32.Roy, CD, Roberts, E. Screening petting zoo animals for the presence of potentially pathogenic Escherichia coli. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 2006; 18: 597.Google Scholar
33.Zschöck, M, et al. Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli in faeces of healthy dairy cows, sheep and goats: prevalence and virulence properties. Letters in Applied Microbiology 2000; 31: 203208.Google Scholar
34.Kudva, IT, Hatfield, PG, Hovde, CJ. Escherichia coli O157:H7 in microbial flora of sheep. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1996; 34: 431433.Google Scholar
35.Vu-Khac, H, Cornick, NA. Prevalence and genetic profiles of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from buffaloes, cattle and goats in central Vietnam. Veterinary Microbiology 2008; 126: 356363.Google Scholar
36.Louie, M, et al. Sequence heterogeneity of the eae gene and detection of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli using serotype specific primers. Epidemiology and Infection 1994; 112: 449461.Google Scholar
37.Barrett, TJ, et al. Virulence factors in Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from humans and cattle. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1992; 165: 979980.Google Scholar
38.Paton, , et al. Molecular characterization of a Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli O113:H21 strain lacking eae responsible for a cluster of cases of hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1999; 37: 33573361.Google Scholar
39.Ethelberg, S, et al. Virulence factors for hemolytic uremic syndrome, Denmark. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2004; 10: 842847.Google Scholar
40.Franz, E, et al. Prevalence of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli stx1, stx2, eaeA, and rfbE genes and survival of E. coli O157: H7 in manure from organic and low-input conventional dairy farms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2007; 73: 21802190.Google Scholar
41.Eklund, M, Leino, K, Siitonen, A. Clinical Escherichia coli strains carrying stx genes: stx variants and stx-positive virulence profiles. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2002; 40: 45854593.Google Scholar
42.Friedrich, AW, et al. Escherichia coli harboring shiga toxin 2 gene variants: frequency and association with clinical symptoms. Journal of Infectious Disease 2002; 185: 7484.Google Scholar
43.Friedrich, AW, et al. Shiga toxin 1c-producing Escherichia coli strains: phenotypic and genetic characterization and association with human disease. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 24482453.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in PCR for the detection of five virulent genes rfbO157, stx1, stx2, eae and hlyA

Figure 1

Table 2. Sampling strata (hierarchically from district to sampling unit), the corresponding number of sampled Black Bengal goats and animals carrying Shiga toxin-producing sorbitol non-fermenting Escherichia coli (SNF STEC) in the study

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Results of PCR assay for four virulent genes: stx1, stx2, hlyA and eae. (a) stx1 gene (614 bp) amplicon: lane M = 1 kb plus DNA ladder; lanes 1, 3–7, stx1-positive isolates; (b) stx2 gene (779 bp) amplicon: lane M = 1 kb plus DNA ladder; lanes 1–7, stx2-positive isolates; (c) hlyA gene (165 bp) amplicon: lane M = 1 kb plus DNA ladder; lanes 4, 9–10, hlyA-positive isolates; (d) eae gene (881 bp) amplicon: lane M = 1 kb plus DNA ladder; lane 2, eae-positive isolate.

Figure 3

Table 3. Distribution of Shiga toxin-producing genes, stx1 and stx2, and two other virulent genes, eae and hlyA, in the 32 sorbitol non-fermenting strains of Escherichia coli isolated from Black Bengal goats in Bangladesh