Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:14:38.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphology and antigenicity studies on reassortant influenza (H3N2) viruses for use in inactivated vaccines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

R. M. Pemberton ,
R. Jennings  and
T. L. Smith
R. M. Pemberton
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, The University of Sheffield, Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, Great Britain
R. Jennings
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, The University of Sheffield, Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, Great Britain
T. L. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, The University of Sheffield, Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, Great Britain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Three influenza A (H3N2) reassortant whole virus vaccine strains with differing antibody-inducing capacities in hamsters were investigated morphologically and antigenically. Although initial measurements of virion circumference, from electron micrographs of vaccine preparations, suggested a relationship of small virion size with low immunogenicity, subsequent immunization with, and morphological investigation of, vaccine virions separated on sucrose gradients, failed to obtain populations whose antibody-inducing capacity clearly correlated with constituent virion density, size, morphology or integrity.

However, antigenic investigation using single radial haemolysis (SRH) and monoclonal antibodies revealed significant differences in antigenic specificity between the strains. Furthermore, a series of H3N2 isolates, derived using standard reassortment procedures, also showed differences in antigenic specificity in their haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) reactions with monoclonal antibodies after five passages in allantois-on-shell cultures. Variation between these isolates and their A/Victoria parent virus could be detected using SRH and hamster sera raised against each isolate.

These results demonstrate variation between candidate influenza A virus vaccine strains, all possessing the same surface (H3N2) glycoproteins, expressed as a consequence of the reassortant system used for their production.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 229 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Al-Khayatt, R., Jennings, R. & Potter, C. W. (1984). Interpretation of responses and protective levels of antibody against attenuated influenza A viruses using single radial haemolysis. Journal of Hygiene 93, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand, C. & Palese, P. (1980). Sequential passage of influenza virus in embryonated eggs or tissue culture: Emergence of mutants. Virology 107, 424–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downie, J. C. (1984). A genetic and monoclonal analysis of high-yielding reassortants of influenza A viruses used for human vaccines. Journal of Biological Standardization 12, 101–110.Google Scholar
Gitelman, A. K., Kaverin, N. V., Kharitonenkov, I. G., Rudneva, I. A. & Zhdanov, V. M. (1983). Antigenic changes in mouse-adapted influenza virus strains. Lancet i, 1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodeve, A. C, Jennings, R. & Potter, C. W. (1983). The use of the single radial haemolysis test for assessing antibody response and protective antibody levels in an influenza B vaccine study. Journal of Biological Standardization 11, 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haaheim, L. E. & Schild, G. C. (1976). Antigenic variants of influenza A virus obtained in vitro. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 53, 305–311.Google Scholar
Hamzawi, M., Jennings, R. & Potter, C. W. (1981). Antigenicity in hamsters of inactivated vaccines prepared from recombinant influenza viruses. Journal of Hygiene 87, 453–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirst, G. K. (1948). Nature of virus receptors of red cells: evidence on chemical nature of virus receptors of red cells and existence of closely analogous substance in normal serum. Journal of Experimental Medicine 87, 301–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobson, D., Curry, R. C. & Beare, A. S. (1973). Haemagglutination-inhibition antibody titres as a measure of protection against influenza in man. Developments in Biological Standardisation 20, 164–168.Google Scholar
Jennings, R., Smith, T. L., Spencer, R. C, Mellersh, A. R., Edey, D., Fenton, P. & Potter, C. W. (1984). Inactivated influenza virus vaccines in man: a comparative study of subunit and split vaccines using two methods for assessment of antibody responses. Vaccine 2, 75–80.Google Scholar
Kendal, A. P., Galphin, J. C. & Palmer, E. L. (1977). Replication of influenza virus at elevated temperatures: Production of virus-like particles with reduced matrix protein content. Virology 76, 186–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilbourne, E. D., Schulman, J. L., Schild, G. C, Schloer, G., Swanson, J. & Bucher, D. (1971). Correlated studies of a recombinant influenza virus vaccine. Journal of Infectious Diseases 124, 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, W. G., Air, G. M., Webster, R. G. & Markoff, L. J. (1982). Amino acid sequence changes in antigenic variants of type A influenza virus N2 neuraminidase. Virology 122, 450–460.Google Scholar
Laver, W. G. & Webster, R. G. (1968). Selection of antigenic variants of influenza viruses. Isolation and peptide mapping of their haemagglutinating proteins. Virology 34, 193–202.Google Scholar
Naeve, C. W., Webster, R. G. & Hinshaw, V. S. (1983). Phenotypic variation in influenza virus reassortants with identical gene constellations. Virology 128, 331–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norang, H. K. & Codd, A. A. (1979). A low-speed centrifugation technique for the preparation of grids for direct virus examination by electron microscopy. Journal of Clinical Pathology 32, 304–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford, J. S., Schild, G. C, Potter, C. W. & Jennings, R. (1979). The specificity of the anti-haemagglutinin antibody response induced in man by inactivated influenza vaccines and by natural infection. Journal of Hygiene 82, 51–61.Google Scholar
Oxford, J. S., Yetts, R. & Schild, G. C. (1982). Quantitation and analysis of the specificity of post-immunization antibodies to influenza B using single radial haemolysis. Journal of Hygiene 88, 325–333.Google Scholar
Russell, S. M., McCahon, D. & Beare, A. S. (1975). A single radial haemolysis technique for the measurement of influenza antibody. Journal of General Virology 27, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schild, G. C, Oxford, J. S., de Jong, J. C. & Webster, R. G. (1983). Evidence for host cell selection of influenza virus antigenic variants. Nature, London 303, 706–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. J. & Davies, J. R. (1977). The response to inactivated influenza A (H3N2) vaccines: the development and effect of antibodies to the surface antigens. Journal of Hygiene 78, 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeyen, M., Fang, R., Min Jou, W., Devos, R., Huylebroeck, D., Saman, E. & Fiers, W. (1980). Antigenic drift between the haemagglutinin of the Hong Kong influenza strains A/Aichi/2/68 and A/Victoria/3/75. Nature, London 286, 771–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, R. G. & Laver, W. G. (1980). Determination of the number of non-overlapping antigenic areas of Hong-Kong (H3N2) influenza virus haemagglutinin with monoclonal antibodies and the selection of variants with potential epidemiological significance. Virology 104, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, R. G. & Berton, M. T. (1981). Analysis of antigenic drift in the haemagglutinin molecule of influenza B virus with monoclonal antibodies. Journal of General Virology 54, 243–251.Google Scholar
Wood, J. M., Schild, G. C, Newman, R. W. & Valerie, Seagroatt (1977). Application of an improved single-radial immunodiffusion technique for the assay of haemagglutinin antigen content of whole virus and subunit influenza vaccines. In Developments in Biological Standardisation, vol. 39, pp. 193–200. Basel: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Yewdell, J. W., Webster, R. G. & Gerhard, W. (1979). Antigenic variation in three distinct determinants of an influenza A haemagglutinin molecule. Nature, London 279, 246–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed