Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:25:50.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implications of coliform variability in the assessment of the sanitary quality of recreational waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Jay M. Fleisher
Jay M. Fleisher
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, Downstate Medical Center 450 Clarkson Avenue, Box 43, Brooklyn, New York 11203, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The most widely used indicator of the sanitary quality of recreational waters is the coliform group of bacteria. Present techniques of coliform enumeration are imprecise, and this fact is too often overlooked in routine water quality surveys as well as in research efforts seeking quantitative relationships between coliform density and the health effects of recreational waters. To illustrate this point, three years of data gathered by the New York City Department of Health as part of their routine beach water sampling programme were re-analysed, taking the limited precision of each coliform estimate into account. Re-analysis showed 56·6% of the data were not significantly different (P > 0·05) from the standard being used. This large percentage of the data was of little value in determining the acceptability of the waters being sampled relative to the standard being used and thus represented a substantial waste of time and expense. Of the remaining data, half indicated acceptable water quality and half indicated unacceptable water quality relative to the standard. These three years of data, therefore, gave little information on the acceptability of the water quality at this location with respect to the standard being used. The data further suggest significant differences in coliform density within sample dates. It is recommended that in future water quality surveys, or in studies of the health effects of recreational waters as related to coliform density, emphasis should shift from maximizing the number of sample dates to maximizing the number of replicate determinations made per sample date.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 193 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

American Public Health Association (1971). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
Brenniman, G. R., Rosenberg, S. H. & Northrop, R. L. (1981). Microbial sampling variables and recreational water quality standards. American Journal of Public Health 71, 283–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabelli, V. J. (1979). Relationship of microbial indicators to health effects at marine bathing beaches. American Journal of Public Health 69, 690–696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carney, J. F.Carty, C. E. & Colwell, R. R. (1975). Seasonal occurrence and distribution of microbial indicators and pathogens in the Rhode River of Chesapeake Bay. Applied Microbiology 30, 771–780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, D. H., Hanes, N. B. & Lord, S. M. (1971). A critical examination of bathing water quality standards. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 43, 2229.Google ScholarPubMed
Geldreich, E. E. (1972). Buffalo Lake recreational water quality: a study in bacteriological data interpretation. Water Research 6, 913–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerba, C. P., Labelle, R. L., Goyal, S. M., Melnick, S. M., Cech, I. & Bogdan, G. F. (1980). Relationships between environmental factors, bacterial indicators, and the occurrence of enteric viruses in estuarine sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 39, 588–596.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. J. (1968). Enteric disease criteria for recreational waters. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division 94, 1253–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, B. (1959). Sewage contamination of coastal bathing waters in England and Wales. A bacteriological and epidemiological study. Journal of Hygiene 57, 435–472.Google Scholar
New York City Department of Health (1982). Beach and Harbor Water Sampling Program 1979–1981. New York.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J., Twedt, & Flannigan, L. K. (1973). Relationships of indicator and pathogenic bacteria in stream water. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 45, 1736–1745.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1969). Biometry. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A. J. (1953). Studies of bathing water quality and health. American Journal of Public Health 43, 529–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tate, R. F. & Klett, F. W. (1959). Optimal confidence intervals for the variance of a normal distribution. Journal of the American Statistical Association 54, 674–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velz, C. J. (1970). Applied Steam Sanitation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar