Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:43:51.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Group G streptococci in healthy school-children and in patients with glomerulonephritis in Trinidad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

H. F. M. Reid ,
D. C. J. Bassett ,
T. Poon-King ,
J. B. Zabriskie  and
S. E. Read
H. F. M. Reid
Affiliation:
Trinidad and Tobago Public Health Laboratory, Port of Spain, Trinidad
D. C. J. Bassett
Affiliation:
PAHO/WHO Caribbean Epidemiology Centre (CAREC), Port of Spain, Trinidad
T. Poon-King
Affiliation:
General Hospital, San Fernando, Trinidad
J. B. Zabriskie
Affiliation:
The Rockefeller University, New York, U.S.A.
S. E. Read
Affiliation:
The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The group G streptococcus has generally not been considered a prominent pathogen. In a 1982 study of the colonization rate by β-haemoly tic streptococci in apparently healthy children, age 5–11 years, 25 of 69 isolates belonged to group G. This surprisingly high rate of group G colonization (14·3%) led to a retrospective study of school surveys in 1967 which showed that the colonization rate with this organism was 2·3% (range 1·3–3·5%). A review of bacitracin-sensitive streptococcal isolates from hospital admissions of patients with acute glomerulonephritis (AGN), rheumatic fever, and their siblings, between January 1967 and July 1980, was conducted. Of 1063 bacitracin-sensitive isolates, 63 were group G, and 52 of these were isolated from AGN patients and their siblings, i.e. 7 from skin lesions of AGN patients, 40 from the throats of siblings and only 5 from the skins of the siblings. The other 11 group G isolates were from rheumatic-fever patients and their siblings. Thus, the group G colonization rate fluctuates in the population. The isolation of only group G streptococci from skin lesions of patients with AGN suggests a possible association between group G streptococcal pyoderma and acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 94 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 61 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, D., Blevins, A., Louria, D. B. & Henkel, J. S. (1970). Groups B, C and G streptococcal infections in a cancer hospital. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 174, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. J. (1974). Unusual occurrence of neonatal septicaemia due to group G streptococcus. Pediatrics 53, 568–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassett, D. C. J. (1972). Streptococcal pyoderma and acute nephritis in Trinidad. British Journal of Dermatology 36, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belcher, D. E., Afoakwa, S. N., Osei-Tutu, E., Wurapa, F. K. & Osei, L. (1975). Non-group A streptococci in Ghanaian patients with pyoderma. Lancet ii, 1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brans, Y. W. (1974). Group G streptococcal sepsis. Pediatrics 55, 745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, K. K., Christensen, P., Flamhole, L. & Ripa, T. (1974). Frequency of streptococci of groups A, B, C, D and G in urethra and cervix swab specimens from patients with suspected gonococcal infection. Acta pathologica et microbiologica scandinavica B 82, 470–474.Google Scholar
Duma, R. J., Weinberg, A. N., Medrek, R. G. & Kunz, L. J. (1969). Streptococcal infections. A bacteriologic and clinical study of streptococcal bacteraemia. Medicine 48, 87–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, A. E. & Read, S. E. (1981). Group G streptococcal colonization and sepsis in neonates. Journal of Paediatrics 99, 944–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancefield, R. C. & Hare, R. (1935). The serological differentiation of pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains of hemolytic streptococci from parturient women. Journal of Experimental Medicine 61, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawal, S. F., Angiwo, C. E. & Ogunbi, O. (1979). Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Lagos, Nigeria. In Pathogenic stretococci (ed. Parker, M.T.), p. 130. Surrey, England: Reedbooks.Google Scholar
Maxted, W. R. & Potter, E. V. (1967). The presence of type-12 M-protein antigen in group G streptococci. Journal of General Microbiology 49, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCue, J. D. (1982). Group G streptococcal pharyngitis. Journal of the American Medical Association 248, 1333–1336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nieburg, P. I. (1979). Fatal group G streptococcal sepsis in a neonate. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 11, 93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlander, I. M., Thal, E. & Tunevall, G. (1975). Occurrence and significance of hemolytic streptococci groups B-U in human infectious disease. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 7, 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, M. T. (1969). Streptococcal skin infection and acute glomerulo-nephritis. British Journal of Dermatology 81, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, E. V., Ortiz, J. S., Sharrett, A. R., Burt, E. G., Bray, J. P., Finklea, J. F., Poon-Kino, T. & Earle, D. P. (1971). Changing types of nephritogenic streptococci in Trinidad. Journal of Clinical Investigation 50, 1195–1205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potter, E. V., Poon-Kino, T., Svartman, M., Burt, E. G., Sharrett, A. R., Bray, J. P., Ortiz, J. S., Finklea, J. F. & Earle, D. P. (1972). Unusual streptococcal strains in Trinidad and their relation to nephritis and rheumatic fever. In Streptococcal Disease and the Community (ed. Haverkorn, M. J.), pp. 286–292. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Potter, E. V., Svartman, M., Poon-Kino, T. & Earle, D. P. (1977). The families of patients with acute rheumatic feverorglomerulonephritis in Trinidad. American Journal of Ejndemiology 106, 130–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taplin, D., Lansdell, L., Allen, A. M., Rodriguez, R. & Cortes, A. E. (1973). Prevalence of streptococcal pyoderma in relation to climate and hygiene. Lancet i, 501–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar