Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:02:05.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of coumatetralyl against two predominant murid species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Girish Chopra  and
V. R. Parshad
Girish Chopra
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004:, India
V. R. Parshad
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004:, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Coumatetralyl was evaluated in the laboratory against Bandicota bengalensis and Rattus rattus. Feeding tests with 0·0375 % coumatetralyl baits produced 100 % mortality after a single day feeding period in B. bengalensis and after a 10–day period in R. rattus. The anticoagulant bait is less palatable in comparison to plain bait. In the case of R. rattus, LFP50 and LFP98 and their 95 % confidence limits were 3·89 (2·62–5·77) days and 11·22 (6·1–20·65) days respectively. Median period of survival and its 95% confidence limits of B. bengalensis and R. rattus were 4·7 (3·85–5·7) days and 11·2 (9·33–13·44) days respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 94 , Issue 3 , June 1985 , pp. 327 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Brooks, J. E., Htun, P. T. & Naing, H. (1980). The susceptibility of Bandicota bengalensis from Rangoon, Burma to several anticoagulant rodenticides Journal of Hygiene 84, 127–135.Google Scholar
Chatuevedi, G. C., Madsen, C. R. & Thakore, K. M. (1975). Studies on efficacy of different anticoagulant rodenticides on Rattus rattus (House rat). Proceedings, All India Rodent Seminar, Ahmadabad, India, pp. 139–141.Google Scholar
Chopra, G., Parshed, V. R. & Guraya, S. S. (1984). Rodent pest problem in Punjab. National Symposium on Impact of Non-insect Pests and Predators on Food Production and Environment, IARI, New Delhi, India, pp. 72–73.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1971). Probit Analysis, 3rd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greaves, J. H. & Rehman, A. B. (1977). The susceptibility of Tatera indica, Nesokia indica and Bandicota bengalensis to three anticoagulant rodenticides. Journal of Hygiene 78, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litchfield, J. T. Jr (1949). A method for rapid graphic solution of time per cent effect curves. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Experimental Therapeutics 97, 399–408.Google Scholar
Mathur, R. P. (1982). The comparative efficacy of certain anticoagulant rodenticides against the gerbils, Tatera indica indica Hardwicke and Meriones Hurrianae Jerdon. Ph.D. thesis (unpublished), Agra University, Agra, India.Google Scholar
Mukthabai, K. & Krishnakumari, M. K. (1976). Responses of Rattus species to anticoagulant poisoning. Comparative Physiology and Ecology 1, 129–135.Google Scholar
Prakash, I. (1976). Rodent Pest Management — Principles and Practices. Monograph no. 4, CAZRI, Jodhpur, India1–28.Google Scholar
Prakash, I. (1977). Second regional training seminar on field rat control and research. Pestology 1, 27–32.Google Scholar