Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:59:20.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carbon abatement costs: an integrated approach for India*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Sujata Gupta
Affiliation:
Tata Energy Research Institute, India Habitat Place, Lodi Road, New Delhi 110003, India
Stephen G. Hall
Affiliation:
London Business School, Sussex Place, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4SA

Abstract

Economic models for assessing costs of greenhouse gas abatement can be classified as macroeconomic (top-down) models or micro (bottom-up) models. As yet little attention has been focused on the modelling of developing countries. This paper proposes a methodology for integrating the two approaches and illustrates it with the example of India. The results show that a carbon tax would have limited effectiveness in controlling carbon emissions. Investing carbon tax revenues in carbon-abating technologies can give substantial carbon savings. The costs of carbon abatement using the integrated model are higher than those predicted by other global models with India as a sub-region.

Type
Theory and Applications
Copyright
Copyright © 1996, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. and Bird, C. (1990), ’Carbon emissions and carbon fixing from an economic perspective’, University College, London, and St Antony’s College, Oxford.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. and Bird, C. (1992), ’Carbon accumulation and technical progress—a simulation study of costs’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 54(1): 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, T. and Lewney, R. (1991), ’A green scenario for the UK economy’, in Barker, T., ed., Green Futures for Economic Growth: Britain in 2010, Cambridge Econometrics.Google Scholar
Barrett, S. (1990), ’Pricing the environment: the economic and environmental consequences of a carbon tax’, Economic Outlook 14(5): 2433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blitzer, C.R., Eckaus, R.S., Lahiri, S. and Meeraus, A. (1990), ’A general equilibrium analysis of the effects of carbon emissions restrictions on economic growth in a developing country’, Workshop on Economic/Energy/Environmental Modeling for Climate Policy Analysis, 2223 Oct., The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Blitzer, C.R., Eckaus, R.S., Lahiri, S. and Meeraus, A. (1992), ’How restricting carbon dioxide and methane emissions would affect the Indian economy’, Policy Research Working Papers, The World Bank.Google Scholar
Boero, G., Clarke, R. and Winters, L.A. (1991), The Macroeconomic Consequences of Controlling Greenhouse Gases: A Survey, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Boone, L., Hall, S.G. and Kemball–Cook, D. (1992), ’Fossil fuel demand for nine OECD countries’, Discussion Paper No. 21–92, Centre for Economic Forecasting, London Business School.Google Scholar
Boonekamp, P.G.M., Kram, T., Okken, P.A., Rouw, M. and Tiemersma, D. (1989), Baseline and CO2-Response Scenarios for the Netherlands, Energy Study Centre, Petten, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Burniaux, J.M., Martin, J.P., Nicoletti, G. and Martins, J. Oliveira (1991), ’The costs of policies to reduce global emissions of CO2: initial simulation results with Green’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 103.Google Scholar
CBO (Congressional Budget Office) (1990), Carbon Charges as a Response to Global Warming: The Effects of Taxing Fossil Fuels, Washington, DC: The Congress of the United States.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, K., Hall, S.G. and Taylor, M.P. (1992), Applied Econometric Techniques, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Davidson, J.E.H., Hendry, D.F., Srba, F. and Yeo, S. (1978), ’Econometric modelling of the aggregate time-series relationship between consumers’ expenditure and income in the United Kingdom’, Economic Journal 88: 661692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldemberg, J., Johansson, T.B., Reddy, A.K.N., Williams, R.H. (1987), Energy for a Sustainable World. New Delhi: Wiley-Eastern.Google Scholar
Government of India (1991), Sectoral Energy Demand in India, New Delhi: Planning Commission.Google Scholar
Grubb, M. (1993), ’Policy modelling for climate change. The missing models’, Energy Policy 21(3): 203208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubler, A., Messner, S., Schrattenholzer, L. and Schafer, A. (1993), ’Emission reduction at the global level’, Energy 18(5), 539581.Google Scholar
Gupta, S. (1995), ’Carbon dioxide abatement costs in an empirical model of the Indian economy—an integration of micro and macro approaches’, PhD thesis, London Business School, University of London.Google Scholar
Hodgson, D. and Miller, K. (1995), ’Modelling UK energy demand’, in Barker, T., Ekins, P. and Johnstone, N., eds., Global Warming and Energy Demand, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingham, A. and Ulph, A. (1990), Market-based Instruments for Reducing CO2 Emissions — The Case for U.K. Manufacturing, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (1992), IEA Model, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (1993), Energy Statistics and Balances, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. and Wilcoxen, P.J. (1990), ’The costs of controlling U.S. carbon diox­ide emissions’, Workshop on Economics/Energy/Environmental Modeling for Climate Policy Analysis, 22–23 Oct., The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Lovins, A.B. and Lovins, H.L. (1991), ’Least cost climatic stabilisation’, Annual Review of Energy and Environment 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manne, A.S. and Richels, R.G. (1990), ’Co2 emission limits: an economic cost analysis for the USA’, Energy Journal 11(2): 5174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manne, A.S. and Richels, R.G. (1992), Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO2 Emission Limits, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marks, R.E., Swan, P.L., McLennan, P., Schodde, R., Dixon, P.B. and Johnson, D.T. (1990), The Cost of Australian Carbon Dioxide Abatement, Sydney: Australian Graduate School of Management, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Mathur, A., Gupta, S. and Khanna, N. (1992), ’India country paper’, in Pachauri, R.K. and Bhandari, P., eds., Global Warming Mitigation Strategies and Perspectives from Asia and Brazil, New Delhi: TATA McGraw-Hill Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (1990), ’An intertemporal general equilibrium model of economic growth and climate change’, Workshop on Economics/Energy/Environmental Modeling for Climate Policy Analysis, 22–23 Oct., The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Smith, C., Hall, S. and Mabey, N. (1995), ’Econometric modelling of international carbon tax regimes’, Energy Economics 17(2): 133146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sondheimer, J. (1991), ’Macro-economic effects of a carbon tax’, in Barker, T., ed., Green Futures for Economic Growth: Britain in 2010, Cambridge Econometrics.Google Scholar
Symons, E., Proops, J. and Gay, P. (1994), ’Carbon taxes, consumer demand and carbon dioxide emissions: a simulation analysis for the UK’, Fiscal Studies 15(2): 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (1992), ’UNEP greenhouse gas abatement costing study’, UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment, Riso National Laboratory, Denmark.Google Scholar
Weyant, (1993), ’Costs of reducing global carbon emissions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(4): 2746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R.H. (1990), ’Low cost strategies for coping with CO2 emissions limits’, Energy Journal 11(4): 3559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, and , Swisher (1993), ’Exploring the gap. Top-down versus bottom-up analyses of the cost of mitigating global warming’, Energy Policy 21(3): 249263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (1992), World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank (1993), World Bank Tables, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank (1994), World Development Report 1994: Infrastructure for Development, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar