Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:34:49.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the costs of living with wildlife in developing countries using willingness to pay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

WILLIAM R. SUTTON ,
DOUGLAS M. LARSON  and
LOVELL S. JARVIS
WILLIAM R. SUTTON
Affiliation:
Senior Agricultural and Resource Economist, Europe and Central Asia Region, The World Bank, MSN: H5-503, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA. Tel: 1 202 473 1102. Fax: 1 202 614 0174. Email: [email protected]
DOUGLAS M. LARSON
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, USA and member of the Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics
LOVELL S. JARVIS
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, USA and member of the Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The costs of living with wildlife are assessed using Namibian subsistence farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for deterrents to attacks on crops and livestock. A utility-theoretic approach jointly estimates household WTP for deterrent programs in two ‘currencies’: maize and cash. This has a double payoff. Use of a non-cash staple increases respondent comprehension and provides more information about preferences, improving the accuracy of results. The household shadow value of maize is also identified. Significant costs from living with elephants and other types of wildlife are demonstrated. Compensation for farmers may be warranted on equity and efficiency grounds. Uncontrolled domestic cattle generate even higher costs to farmers than wildlife, highlighting the need to clarify property rights among these farmers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 475 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberini, A. 1995, ‘Efficiency of willingness-to-pay estimates: bivariate and interval-data models’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandara, R. and Tisdell, C. 2002, ‘Asian elephants as agricultural pests: economics of control and compensation in Sri Lanka’, Natural Resources Journal 42: 491–519.Google Scholar
Bandara, R. and Tisdell, C. 2004, ‘The net benefit of saving the Asian elephant: a policy and contingent valuation study’, Ecological Economics 48: 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E.B., Burgess, J.C., Swanson, T.M., and Pearce, D.W. 1990, Elephants, Economics and Ivory, London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Barnard, M. 2002, ‘Game products fund boosts conservancie’, The Namibian Newspaper, 28 November.Google Scholar
Barnes, J.I. 1998, ‘Wildlife economics: a study of direct use values in Botswana's wildlife sector’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Economics, University College, London.Google Scholar
Barnes, J.I. 2001, ‘Economic returns and allocation of resources in the wildlife sector of Botswana’, South African Journal of Wildlife Research 31: 141–153.Google Scholar
Barnes, J.I., MacGregor, J., and Weaver, L.C. 2001, ‘Economic analysis of community wildlife use initiatives in Namibia’, Directorate of Environmental Affairs Research Discussion Paper No. 42, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Namibia.Google Scholar
Bell, R.H.V. 1984, ‘The man–animal interface: an assessment of crop damage and wildlife control’, in Bell, R.H.V. and Mcshane-Caluzi, E. (eds), Conservation and Wildlife Management in Africa, Malawi: US Peace Corps, pp. 387–416.Google Scholar
Brown, G. Jr. and Henry, W. 1993, ‘The viewing value of elephants’, in Barbier, E.B. (ed.), Economics and Ecology: New Frontiers and Sustainable Development, London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Cameron, T.A. and Quiggin, J. 1994, ‘Estimation using contingent valuation data from a dichotomous choice with follow-up questionnaire’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27: 218–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J.C., Hanemann, W.M., and Signorello, G. 2002, ‘One-and-one-half-bound dichotomous choice contingent valuation’, Review of Economics and Statistics 84: 742–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Janvry, A., Fafchamps, M., and Sadoulet, E. 1991, ‘Peasant household behaviour with missing markets: some paradoxes explained’, The Economic Journal 101: 1400–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Directorate of Planning 1999, ‘Farm-household economics survey of the Caprivi region of Namibia’, Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Rural Development, Namibia.Google Scholar
Freeman, M.A. III 1993, The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Value: Theory and Methods, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Hanemann, W.M., Loomis, J.B., and Kanninen, B. 1991, ‘Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 1255–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoare, R.E. 1999, ‘Determinants of human–elephant conflict in a land-use mosaic’, Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, L.S. 1984, ‘Overgrazing and range degradation in Africa: the need and the scope for government control of livestock numbers’, Working Paper, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Kangwana, K. 1996, ‘Assessing the impact of human–elephant interactions’, in Kangwana, K. (ed.), Studying Elephants, Kenya: The African Wildlife Foundation.Google Scholar
Kiiru, W. 1995, ‘The current status of human–elephant conflict in Kenya’, Pachyderm 19: 15–19.Google Scholar
Krug, W. 1998, ‘Etosha environment and tourism study: an analysis of tourists’ willingness to pay and demand structure for nature tourism – a summary of preliminary results', Directorate of Environmental Affairs, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Namibia.Google Scholar
Larson, D.M. 2002, ‘The structure of shadow wages’, Working Paper, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Larson, D.M. and Shaikh, S.L. 2001, ‘Empirical specification requirements for two-constraint models of recreation choice’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83: 428–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, D.M., Shaikh, S.L., and Layton, D. 2004, ‘Revealed preferences for leisure time from stated preference data’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelsohn, J. and Roberts, C. 1997, ‘An environmental profile and atlas of Caprivi’, Directorate of Environmental Affairs, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Namibia.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. 1989, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
National Planning Commission 1998, ‘1997/1998 annual agricultural survey’, Central Bureau of Statistics, Namibia.Google Scholar
Ngure, N. 1995, ‘People–elephant conflict management in Tsavo, Kenya’, Pachyderm 19: 20–25.Google Scholar
O'Connell, C. 1995a, ‘East/west Caprivi natural resource monitoring project: elephant/human conflicts’, Final Technical Report, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Namibia.Google Scholar
O'Connell, C. 1995b, ‘East Caprivi community game guards problem animal report: 1991–1995’, Directorate of Environmental Affairs, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Namibia.Google Scholar
Pricewaterhouse 1998, ‘Wildlife electric fencing projects in communal areas of Zimbabwe – current efficacy and future role’, Report prepared for WWF Zimbabwe, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Harare.Google Scholar
Rodwell, T.C., Tagg, J., and Grobler, M. 1995, ‘Wildlife resources in the Caprivi, Namibia: the results of an aerial census in 1994 and comparisons with past surveys’, Research Discussion Paper No. 9, Directorate of Environmental Affairs, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Namibia.Google Scholar
Sadoulet, E. and de Janvry, A. 1995, Quantitative Development Policy Analysis, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Shyamsundar, P. and Kramer, R.A. 1996, ‘Tropical forest protection: an empirical analysis of the costs borne by local people’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31: 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, I., Squire, L., and Strauss, J. (eds) 1986, Agricultural Household Models: Extensions, Applications, and Policy, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press for The World Bank.Google Scholar
Stoltz, A.-K. 1997, ‘Wildlife and nature tourism in Namibia: a demand study’, Master's thesis, University of Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Sutton, W.R. 1998, ‘The costs of living with elephants in Namibia’, Proceedings from the Workshop on Cooperative Regional Wildlife Management in Southern Africa, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Sutton, W.R. 2001, ‘The economics of elephant management in Namibia’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Swallow, B.M. and Woudyalew, M. 1994, ‘Evaluating willingness to contribute to a local public good: application of contingent valuation to tsetse control in Ethiopia’, Ecological Economics 11: 153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, T.M. 1994, The International Regulation of Extinction, New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Rohr, K. 1997, ‘1996/97 community game guards problem animal report’, WWF/LIFE Project, Namibia.Google Scholar
Wambuguh, O. 1998, ‘Local communities and wildlife: a spatial analysis of human–wildlife interactions in Laikipia District, Kenya’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar