Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:41:27.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Payments for ecosystem services and poverty reduction: concepts, issues, and empirical perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

ERWIN H. BULTE ,
LESLIE LIPPER ,
RANDY STRINGER  and
DAVID ZILBERMAN
ERWIN H. BULTE
Affiliation:
Development Economics Group, Wageningen University, and Department of Economics, Tilburg University, Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands. Email: [email protected]
LESLIE LIPPER
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Development Economics Division, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. Email: [email protected]
RANDY STRINGER
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. Email: [email protected]
DAVID ZILBERMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, University of California at Berkeley, USA, and the Giannini Foundation. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Paying for the provision of environmental services is a recent policy innovation attracting much attention in both developed and developing countries. This innovation, referred to as ‘payments for ecosystem services’ (when the emphasis is on enhancing ‘nature’ services) or ‘payments for environmental services’ (when amenities provided by the built environment are also included) is referred to here as PES. PES programs aim to harness market forces to obtain more efficient environmental outcomes. Since so many opportunities for PES programs could involve farmers in poor regions, international aid agencies and private donors, looking for a double dividend, increasingly consider using PES programs as a potential way of meeting both social and environmental objectives.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 3: Payment for ecosystem services , June 2008 , pp. 245 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, B.A., Lakshminarayan, P.G., Wu, J., and Zilberman, D. 1996, ‘The economics of a public fund for environmental amenities: a study of CRP contracts’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 961–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. and Oates, W. 1989, The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coase, R.H. 1960, ‘The problem of social cost’, Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomitz, K.M. et al. . 2007, ‘At loggerheads? Agricultural expansion, poverty reduction, and environment in the tropical forests’, World Bank Policy Research Report, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
FAO 2007, Paying Farmers for Environmental Services, State of Food and Agriculture 2007, Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Heath, J. and Binswanger, H. 1996, ‘Natural resource degradation effects of poverty and population growth are largely policy-induced: the case of Colombia’, Environment and Development Economics 1: 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., and Platais, G. 2005, ‘Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America’, World Development 33: 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrot-Maître, D. 2006, The Vittel Payments for Ecosystem Services: A ‘Perfect’ PES Case? London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Vosti, S. and Reardon, T. (eds) 1997, Sustainability, Growth and Poverty Alleviation: A Policy and Agroecological Perspective, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wunder, S. 2005, ‘Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts’, CIFOR Occasional Paper 42, Bogor.Google Scholar