Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T21:56:05.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jack of All Trades: Cramp Shipbuilding, Mixed Production, and the Limits of Flexible Specialization in American Warship Construction, 1940–1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Thomas B Heinrich
Thomas B Heinrich*
Affiliation:
Baruch College, History, 55 Lexington Ave., New York, NY, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Naval shipbuilding was one of the most ambitious industrial undertakings of World War II. A marginal business, in 1939 employing only twelve shipyards, it expanded over the course of the war into a massive network of shipbuilding firms, engineering works, steel mills, and specialty producers that built the world's largest fleet. At its peak in 1944, warship building employed one million shipyard workers, a million others in collateral industries, and consumed one-fifth of the nation's steel output in the construction of aircraft carriers, battleships, cruisers, destroyers, and thousands of smaller combatants.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 275 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2010. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Books

Connery, Robert H. The Navy and Industrial Mobilization in World War II. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Cramp Shipbuilding Company Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1940–1944. Philadelphia: Cramp Shipbuilding Company, 1944.Google Scholar
Crivelli, Albert F. Shipfitter’s Manual. New York: Pitman Publishing Company, 1941.Google Scholar
Davidson, Joel R. The Unsinkable Fleet: The Politics of U.S. Navy Expansion in World War II. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Deane, A.L. Shipyard Practice and Training Course: Arc Welding. Camden, NJ: New York Shipbuilding Corporation, 1941.Google Scholar
Dorwart, Jeffrey. The Philadelphia Navy Yard From the Birth of the U.S. Navy to the Nuclear Age. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Friedman, Norman. U.S. Amphibious Ships and Craft: An Illustrated Design History. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. 134Google Scholar
Friedman, Norman. U.S. Cruisers: An Illustrated Design History. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Friedman, Norman. U.S. Destroyers: An Illustrated Design History. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Garyantes, H.F. Handbook for Shipwrights. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1944.Google Scholar
Gordon, Gilbert Andrew Hugh. British Seapower and Procurement Between the Wars: A Reappraisal ofRearmament. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Thomas. Ships for the Seven Seas: Philadelphia Shipbuilding in the Age ofIndustrial Capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Holley, Irving Jr. Buying Aircraft: Materiel Procurement for the Army Air Forces. Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 1964.Google Scholar
Hone, Thomas. American and British Aircraft Carrier Development, 1919–1941. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lane, Frederick C. Ships for Victory: A History of Shipbuilding Under the U.S. Maritime Commission in World War II. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Michael, and Daniel, Todd. Anglo-American Shipbuilding in World War II: A Geographical Perspective. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2004.Google Scholar
Miller, John A. Men and Volts at War: The Story of General Electric in World War II. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1948.Google Scholar
New York Shipbuilding Corporation. 50 Years. Camden, NJ: New York Shipbuilding Corporation, 1948.Google Scholar
Palmer, David. Organizing the Shipyards: Union Strategy in Three Northeast Ports, 1933–1945. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Peebles, Hugh. Warshipbuilding on the Clyde: Naval Orders and the Prosperity of the Clyde Shipbuilding Industry, 1889–1939. Edinburgh, Scotland: Donald, 1987.Google Scholar
Scranton, Philip. Endless Novelty: SpecialtyProduction and American Industrialization, 1865–1925. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Shipfitting Practice: A Manual of Instruction for Pre-Employment and Supplementary Training. Harrisburg, PA: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1941.Google Scholar
Snow, Ralph L. Bath Iron Works: The First Hundred Years. Bath, ME: Maine Maritime Museum, 1987.Google Scholar
Sumrall, Robert F. Iowa Class Battleships: Their Design, Weapons and Equipment. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Walker, Fred M. Song of the Clyde: A History of Clyde Shipbuilding. New York: Norton, 1984.Google Scholar
Waszkis, Helmut. Mining in the Americas: Stories and History. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 1993.Google Scholar
Weir, Gary E. Forged in War: The Naval-Industrial Complex and American Submarine Construction, 1940–1961. Washington, DC: Naval Historical Center, 1993.Google Scholar
Yenne, Bill. The Story ofBoeing Company, Revised and Updated. St. Paul, MN: Zenith, 2005.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Ferguson, Homer L. “TheNewportNewsShipbuildingandDryDockCompany.” ed. Society ofNaval Architects and Marine Engineers. Historical Transactions. New York: Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 1943, 218-20.Google Scholar
Kehler, Timothy J. “Comparison of Shipbuilding and Ship-Repairing Procedure.” The Shipbuilding Business in the United States of America, edited by Fassett, F.G. Jr., vol. 2 (1948). New York: Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 210-50.Google Scholar
Lee, Joong-Jae. “Defense Workers’ Struggles for Patriotic Control: The Labor-Management Contests over Defense Production at Brewster, 1940–1944.” International Labor and Working Class History. 66 (Oct. 2004): 137-54.Google Scholar
Lewis, Robert. “Redesigning the Workplace: The North American Factory in the Interwar Period.” Technology and Culture. 42 (Oct. 2001): 665-84.Google Scholar
Metten, John F. “The New York Shipbuilding Corporation.” Historical Transactions, ed. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. New York: Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 1943, 222-9.Google Scholar
Meyer, Stephen. “Technology and the Workplace: Skilled and Production Workers at Allis-Chalmers, 1900–1941.” Technology and Culture. 29 (Oct. 1988): 839-64.Google Scholar
Tassava, Christopher J. “Weak Seams: Controversies over Welding Theory and Practice in American Shipyards, 1938–1946.” History and Technology. 19 (June 2003): 87–108.Google Scholar
Walters, Jr., and William, L. “American Naval Shipbuilding, 1890–1989.” Geographical Review. 90 (July 2000): 418-31.Google Scholar
Weidenbaum, Murray L. “Product Diversification in Aircraft Manufacturing Industry.” Analysts Journal. 15 (May 1959): 51-6.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Jonathan. “Flexibility and Mass Production at War: Aircraft Manufacture in Britain, the United States, and Germany, 1939–1945.” Technology and Culture. 36 (January 1995): 46-79.Google Scholar

Journals, Magazines, and Newspapers

“406 Pneumatics.” Cramp Ways. 1 (Jan. 1945): 10–1.Google Scholar
“410 Turret Shop.” Cramp Ways. 2 (August 1945): 10-5.Google Scholar
Anderson, Arthur R. “Will She Stick or Will She Slip?” Cramp Ways. 1 (Jan. 1945): 10–1.Google Scholar
“Another ‘Can’t Be Done’ is Accomplished by Cramp.” Cramp News, September 11, 1943: 1.Google Scholar
“Another Cramp Ship Joins Navy After 17 Years.” Philadelphia Record, August 3, 1941: 1.Google Scholar
“Camden Shipyard Tripling Capacity.” New York Times, April 30, 1941: 41.Google Scholar
Corey, Herbert. “Ships Snatched from the Sea.” Nation’sBusiness. March 1943, 46.Google Scholar
“Cramp Drydock.” Cramp Ways. 2 (July 1945): 6-8.Google Scholar
“Cramp Pipe and Copper Shop Solving Many Pipe Problems for the Navy.” Cramp News, October 16, 1943: 2.Google Scholar
“Cramp Provocation of Loc. 42 Backfires.” Shipyard Worker, October 22, 1943: 1.Google Scholar
“Cramp Yard Expected to Shut Down in 30 Days.” Philadelphia Record, September 13, 1946: 1.Google Scholar
“Cramp Yard Stops as Strike Spreads.” New York Times, October 1943: 18.Google Scholar
“Death Claims Harry L. Pierce.” Cramp News, January 8, 1944: 1.Google Scholar
Engel, Leonard. “Hotter Steam Gives Our Navy Supremacy in Speed.” Popular Science. 145 (September 1944): 86-90, 242-6.Google Scholar
“Fab Shop.” Cramp Ways. 1 (Dec. 1944): 14-6.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, James, and MacDonnell, Agnus. “The Mold Loft’s Place in Production.” Marine Engineering. 47 (March 1942): 122-3.Google Scholar
idem, . “The Mold Loft’s Place in Production II.” Marine Engineering. 47 (April 1942): 189.Google Scholar
idem, . “The Mold Loft’s Place in Production III.” Marine Engineering. 47 (May 1942): 128-32.Google Scholar
Guralnick, M. “Cramp’s Rehabilitated Shipyard.” Marine Engineering. 46 (December 1941): 62-4.Google Scholar
Henley, . “Propulsion Machinery in the Process of Construction.” Marine Engineering. 48 (Sept. 1942): 214-8.Google Scholar
“Inside Machine Shop.” Cramp Ways. 2 (April 1945): 8–10.Google Scholar
“James, Reed Sr.” New York Times, July 24, 1941: 17.Google Scholar
Marple, George K. “Notes on Machinery Installation.” Marine Engineering. 50 (February 1943): 180-2.Google Scholar
“Lo. 42 Wins Ruling on Premium Days For Repair.” Shipyard Worker, December 17, 1943: 1-2.Google Scholar
“NLRB Revokes Certification of Loc. 42 for Leadingmen.” Shipyard Worker, September 3, 1943: 1-2.Google Scholar
“Navy Tells Cramp’s to Make Change in Top Bosses After Loc. 42 Blast.” Shipyard Worker, October 29, 1943: 1.Google Scholar
Pearlman, Harold. “Yesterday and Today in Ship Production.” Marine Engineering. 49 (July 1943): 210.Google Scholar
“Rear Admiral DuBose on Board of Cramp’s.” New York Times, October 14, 1940: 35.Google Scholar
Ross, A.A. “Gears for U.S. Defense and Trade.” Marine Engineering. 44 (December 1940): 62-7.Google Scholar
“Shipyard Need Put at 310,000 More Men.” New York Times, April 27, 1941: 30.Google Scholar
“Test Laboratory.” Cramp Ways. 2 (June 1945): 6.Google Scholar
Vickery, Howard L. “Steel Requirements for Shipbuilding.” Marine Engineering. 47 (March 1942): 103-5.Google Scholar
Wyer, R.F. “Electric Arc Welding Developments in 1942.” Marine Engineering. 47 (February 1942): 162.Google Scholar

Government Documents

U.S. House. Committee on Naval Affairs. Hearing on H. R. 9822 to Expedite Naval Shipbuilding. Washington, DC: G. P. O. 76th Cong., 3rd Sess, 14 May 1940.Google Scholar
U.S. House. Committee on Naval Affairs. Investigation ofthe National Defense Program, Vol. 3. Washington, DC: G. P. O. 77th Cong., 2nd Sess., 13 May 1942 to 22 May 1942.Google Scholar
U.S. House. Committee on Naval Affairs. Investigation of the Progress of the War Effort. Renegotiations of War Contracts. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: G. P. O. 78th Cong., 1st Sess., 16 June 1943.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate. Special Committee Investigating the Munitions Industry. Part 19: Naval Shipbuilding. Washington, DC: G. P. O. 74th Cong., 1st Sess., 1 Feb. 1935 to 11 Feb. 1935.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate. Special Committee Investigating the National Defense Program. Part 6: EmergencyShip Construction. Washington, DC: G. P. O. 77th Cong., 1st Sess., 17 July 1941.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate. Special Committee to Investigate the National Defense Program, Shipbuilding Subcommittee. Closed Hearing on Cramp Shipyard. Washington, DC: Master Reporting Company. 78th Cong., 1st Sess., 22 Oct. 1943.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate. Special Committee to Investigate the National Defense Program, Shipbuilding Subcommittee. Closed Hearing on Cramp Shipyard. Washington, DC: Master Reporting Company. 78th Cong., 1st Sess., 4 Nov. 1943.Google Scholar
Bureau of Naval Personnel. Fire Control Fundamentals. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Naval Personnel, 1953.Google Scholar
Bureau of Ordnance. 8-Inch 3-Gun Turrets: Main Armament for USS Salem Class: Turret Description and Operation. Washington, DC: Bureau of Ordnance, 1947.Google Scholar
Office of Production Management, Labor Division. Ships for Freedom. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1941.Google Scholar

Archival Collections

“Bureau of Ships General Correspondence, 1940–1945.” Record Group 19. College Park, Maryland: National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
General Records of the Department of the Navy, Record Group 80, College Park, Maryland: National Archives and Records Administration.Google Scholar
Industrial Union ofMarine and Shipbuilding Workers ofAmerica Archives. University of Maryland College Park.Google Scholar
Records of the U.S. Maritime Commission, Record Group 178, Philadelphia: National Archives and Records Administration Mid-Atlantic Region. Google Scholar
U.S. Navy Shipbuilding Contracts. Navy Department Library. Washington, DC: Washington Navy Yard.Google Scholar
William Cramp & Sons Ship and Engine Building Company Business Papers, J. Welles Henderson Archives and Library, Independence Seaport Museum Library, Philadelphia.Google Scholar