Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:17:16.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Trick or Treat?” The Misrepresentation of American Beef Exports in Britain during the Late Nineteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

David M. Higgins  and
Dev Gangjee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the misrepresentation of American beef in the British market between c. 1890 and c. 1913. We examine the complaints voiced by British consumers, producers, and retailers and we discuss the response of the British government and the United States Department of Agriculture. A new dataset is employed to calculate the price premiums that could be earned from the misrepresentation of beef according to geographic origin. While considerable premiums could be earned by “passing-off” American beef as British in the 1890s, these premiums declined during the 1900s. Particular emphasis is placed on the inability of the British government to act unilaterally on meat marking. This article also considers origin as a means of distinguishing between categories of nonbranded goods. Yet “origin” has many dimensions. Not only does it indicate provenance, it sometimes signals quality associated with provenance while also serving as the basis for protectionist responses. This article therefore contributes to the broader debates surrounding origin marking as a commercial and legal phenomenon.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 203 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2010. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Bell, David, and Valentine, Gill. Consuming Geographies: We Are What We Eat. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Clemen, Rudolf. The American Livestock and Meat Industry, NewYork:The Ronald Press, 1923.Google Scholar
Critchell, John T., and Raymond, Joseph R. A Historyofthe Frozen Meat Trade. London: Constable, 1912.Google Scholar
Finch, Henry. The Law Relating to Merchandise Marks Acts 1887 to 1897. London: William Clowes & Son, 1904.Google Scholar
French, Michael, and Phillips, Jim. Cheated Not Poisoned? Food Regulation in the United Kingdom, 1875–1938. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Gray, Albert. The Law of False Marking: The Merchandise Marks Act, 1887. London: William. Clowes & Son, 1887.Google Scholar
Greeley, Arthur P. Foreign Patent and Trademark Laws: A Comparative Study. Washington, DC: John Byrne & Co, 1899.Google Scholar
Jefferys, James B. Retail Trading in Britain 1850–1950. London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research, 1954.Google Scholar
Ludlow, Henry and Jenkyns, Henry. A Treatise on the Law ofTrademarks and Trade Names. London: William Maxwell, 1877.Google Scholar
Mason, Laura. Food Culture in Great Britain. London: Greenwood Pres, 2004.Google Scholar
Mathews, Alfred. Fifty Years of Agricultural Politics. London: P.S. King & Son, 1915.Google Scholar
Mennell, Stephen. All Manners of Food, 2nd ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Offer, Avner. TheFirstWorldWar: AnAgrarianlnterpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Osgood, Ernest S. The Day of the Cattleman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1929.Google Scholar
Perren, Richard. The Meat Trade in Britain 1840–1914. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.Google Scholar
Poland, H. The Merchandise Marks Act, 1862. London: J. Cockford, 1862.Google Scholar
Putnam, George E. Supplying Britain’s Meat. London: Harrap, 1923.Google Scholar
Rogers, Ben. Beef and Liberty. London: Chatto and Windus, 2003.Google Scholar
Safford, Frank. The Law ofMerchandise Marks. London: Waterlow & Sons, 1893.Google Scholar
Sebastian, Lewis B. The Law of Trademarks and Their Registration and Matters Connected Therewith. London: Stevens & Sons, 1878.Google Scholar
Scholliers, Peter (ed). Food, Drink and Identity: Cooking, Eating and Drinking in Europe since the Middle Ages. Oxford: Berg, 2001.Google Scholar
Skaggs, Jimmy M. Prime Cut. Livestock Raising and Meatpacking in the United States 1607–1983. Texas: A & M University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
The Tariff Commission. Report ofthe Agricultural Committee. London: P.S. King & Son, 1906.Google Scholar
Yeager, Mary. Competition and Regulation: The Development of Oligopoly in the Meat PackingIndustry. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Afton, Bethanie and Turner, Michael. “Prices.” In The Agrarian History of England and Wales, 1850–1914, edited by Collins, Edward, 2038-2105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Belasco, Warren. “Food Matters: Perspectives on an Emerging Field.” In Food Nations, edited by Belasco, Warren and Scranton, Philip, 2–23. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Capie, Forest and Perren, Richard. “The British Market for Meat.” Agricultural History 54 (1980): 502–515.Google Scholar
Church, Roy and Clark, Christine. “Purposive Strategy or Serendipity? Development and Diversification in Three Consumer Product Companies, 191839: J & J Coleman, Reckitt & Sons and Lever Bros./Unilever.” Business History 45 (2003): 23–59.Google Scholar
Church, Roy. “New Perspectives on the History of Products, Firms, Marketing and Consumers in Britain and the United States since the Mid-Nineteenth Century.” Economic History Review 52 (1999): 405–35.Google Scholar
Church, Roy. “Advertising Consumer Goods in Nineteenth Century Britain: Reinterpretations.” Economic History Review 53 (2000): 621–45.Google Scholar
Clemens, Roxeanne. “Geographical Indications, the WTO, and Iowa -80 Beef.” Iowa Agriculture Review 11 (2005): 8–9.Google Scholar
Duguid, Paul. “Developing the Brand: The Case of Alcohol, 1800–1880.” Enterprise and Society 4 (2003): 405–41.Google Scholar
Duguid, Paul. “Networks and Knowledge: The Beginnings and End of the Port Commodity Chain, 1703–1860.” Business History Review 79 (2005): 493–526.Google Scholar
Gangjee, Dev. “Melton Mowbray and the GI Pie in the Sky: Exploring Cartographies of Protection.” Intellectual Property Quarterly 3 (2006): 291–309.Google Scholar
Guy, Kolleen. “Wine, Champagne, and the Making of French Identity in the Belle Epoque.” In Food, Drink and Identity: Cooking, Eating and Drinking in Europe since the Middle Ages, edited by Scholliers, Peter, 163–77. Oxford: Berg, 2001.Google Scholar
Higgins, David and Tweedale, Geoffrey. “‘Asset or Liability’? Trademarks in the Sheffield Cutlery and Tool Trades.” Business History 37 (1995): 1–27.Google Scholar
Higgins, David. “Mutton Dressed as Lamb? The Misrepresentation of Australian and New Zealand Meat in the British Market, c. 1890–1914.” Australian Economic HistoryReview 44 (2004): 161–84.Google Scholar
Higgins, David and Verma, Shraddha. “The Business of Protection: Bass and Co. and Trade Mark Defence.” Accounting, Business & Financial History 19 (2009): 1–19.Google Scholar
Hooker, R.H. “The Meat Supply of the United Kingdom.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 72 (1909): 304–76.Google Scholar
Libecap, Gary D. “The Rise of the Chicago Packers and the Origins of Meat Inspection and AntiTrust.” Economic Inquiry 30 (1992): 242–62.Google Scholar
Libecap, Gary D. “Food Processing Industry: Technological Change.” In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History, Volume 2, edited by Mokyr, Joel, 346–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
O’Grada, Cormac. “British Agriculture, 1860–1914.” In The Economic History of Britain since 1700. Vol. 2, 1860–1914, edited by Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, Dierdree. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Perren, Richard. “The North American Beef and Cattle Trade with Great Britain, 1870–1914.” Economic History Review 24 (1971): 430–44.Google Scholar
Taplin, Ian. “Competitive Pressures and Strategic Repositioning in the Californian Premium Wine Industry.” International Journal of Wine Marketing 18 (2006): 61–70.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, William David. “Live Cattle Export Trade Between United States and Great Britain, 1868–1885.” Agricultural History 36 (1962): 46–52.Google Scholar

Newspapers and Magazines

Aberdeen Weekly Journal Google Scholar
Age and Argus Google Scholar
Bell’s Life and Sporting Chronicle Google Scholar
Country Life Illustrated Google Scholar
Fun Google Scholar
Hearth and Home Google Scholar
Horse and Hound: A Journal ofSport and Agriculture Google Scholar
John Bull Google Scholar
Judy Google Scholar
Le Follet: Journal du Grande Monde, Fashion, Polite Literature, Beaux Arts...etc Google Scholar
Liverpool Mercury Google Scholar
Lloyds Weekly Newspaper Google Scholar
North Wales Chronicle Google Scholar
Penny Satirist Google Scholar
Punch Google Scholar
The Alexandra Magazine and Englishwomen’s Journal Google Scholar
The Bristol Mercury and Daily Post Google Scholar
The Country Gentleman: Sporting Gazette and Agricultural Journal Google Scholar
The Englishwoman’s Domestic Magazine Google Scholar
The Glasgow Herald Google Scholar
The Guardian Google Scholar
The Northern Echo Google Scholar
The Sporting Gazette Google Scholar
The Sporting Gazette and Agricultural Journal Google Scholar
The Sporting Times Google Scholar
The Times Google Scholar

Archival Sources

Meat and Cattle Trade Section of the London Chamber of Commerce. MSS 16686, Guildhall Library, London.Google Scholar
The Meat Trades and Cattle Salesman’s Gazette, various issues, The Worshipful Company of Butchers, London.Google Scholar

Official Sources

Minutes of Evidence taken before the Departmental Committee on Combinations in the Meat Trade, with Appendices and Index to the Evidence. London: HMSO, 1909. Cd. 4661.Google Scholar
Report from the Select Committee on Merchandise marks Act, 1887; Together with the Proceedings of the Committee, Minutes of Evidence and Appendix. British Parliamentary Papers, 1890, XV. 334.Google Scholar
Report from the Select Committee on Marking of Foreign Meat & c; Together with the Proceedings of the Committee, Minutes of Evidence and Appendix. British Parliamentary Papers, 1893, XII. 341.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Agriculture. Minutes of Evidence taken before Her Majesty’s Commisioners Appointed to Inquire into the Subject of Agricultural Depression, British Parliamentary Papers XVI, parts I-III, 1894.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Agriculture. Final ReportofHer Majesty’s Commissioners Appointed to Inquire into the subject of Agricultural Depression, British Parliamentary Papers, XV, 1897.Google Scholar
Report and Special Report from the Select Committee on the Agricultural Produce (Mark) Bill; Together with the Proceedings ofthe Committee, Minutes of Evidence, Appendix and Index. British Parliamentary Papers, 1897, VIII.227.Google Scholar
Report of the Departmental Committee Appointed to Inquire into Combinations in the Meat Trade, With Appendices. London: HMSO, 1909. Cd. 4643.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Report of the Commisioner of Agriculture, 1865. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1866.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Report of the Commisioner of Agriculture, 1872. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1873.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Report of the Commisioner of Agriculture, 1877. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1878.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Report of the Commisioner of Agriculture, 1879. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1880.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Report of the Commisioner of Agriculture, 1880. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1881.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Report of the Commisioner of Agriculture, 1883. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1884.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Report of the Commisioner of Agriculture, 1884. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1885.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Report of the Commisioner of Agriculture, 1885. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1886.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Report of the Commisioner of Agriculture, 1887. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1888.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Report of the Secretary of Agriculture, 1889. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1890.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Report of the Secretary of Agriculture, 1891. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1892.Google Scholar
United Sates Senate Report No. 829 from the Select Committee on the Transportation and Sale of Meat products, report to Accompany S3717, 3718, 3719 and Senate Joint Resolution 78. 51st Congress, 1st Session, Serial Set 2705. Washington, DC, 1890.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Yearbook of Agriculture, 1894. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1895.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Year book of Agriculture, 1895. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1896.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Yearbook of Agriculture, 1896. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1897.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Yearbook of Agriculture, 1901. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1902.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Yearbook of Agriculture, 1906. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1907.Google Scholar