Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:09:49.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

English use by the heads of state at the United Nations General Assembly

Biennial survey of 1,540 speeches between 2004 and 2018

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2019

Tomoyuki Kawashima
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

How do people choose a language when they are proficient in more than one language? This research sheds light on language choice, English use in particular, in diplomacy where an individual speaks primarily for negotiation on behalf of an organization or a community. Nick (2001: 39) argued that ‘language is not a simple tool … but very often the very essence of the diplomatic vocation’. Despite its importance, little has been investigated about language choice in diplomatic meetings (Finsen, 2016). Wodak, Krzyzanowski and Forchtner (2012), one of the few studies, illustrated that 45% of the overall percentage of languages in the European Parliament (EP) meetings was English. To accumulate more data of English use in diplomacy, this research investigated addresses made by the heads of state at the United Nations (UN) General Assembly (GA). The EP is the law-making institution of the European Union (EN) (European Union, 2019), and the UN and the EU have contrasting language policies. Under the EU's non-restrictive language policy, national languages of all 23 members are included in the official languages (Finsen, 2016). On the other hand, the UN restricts the number of official languages to six, namely Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish. This makes a difference in the payment for interpretation services. If representatives would like to speak in Portuguese, the EU provides interpretation. However, the UN does not. The speakers need to provide interpretation into one of the six official languages on their own. These contrasting language policies between the EU and the UN can influence language choice at the UN meetings. Moreover, the UN has a larger number of member states than the EU, and many of them belong to other language or regional organizations. Therefore, this study focuses on the prevalence of English use by the heads of state at the UN GA meetings according to five language and two regional groups.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , June 2021 , pp. 92 - 114
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al–Hayek, R. S. 2016. ‘Arabic–English Code-Mixing by Jordanian University Students.’ Unpublished PhD thesis. Sydney: Western Sydney University.Google Scholar
Ammon, U. 2006. ‘Language conflicts in the European Union: On finding a politically acceptable and practicable solution for EU institutions that satisfies diverging interests.’ International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASEAN Charter. 2008. ‘The ASEAN Charter.’ Online at <https://asean.org/storage/images/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf> (Accessed on January 15, 2019).+(Accessed+on+January+15,+2019).>Google Scholar
Bamgbose, A. 2011. ‘African languages today: The challenge of and prospects for empowerment under globalization.’ Paper presented at the Selected proceedings of the 40th annual conference on African linguistics.Google Scholar
Bilaniuk, L. 2010. ‘Language in the balance: The politics of non-accommodation on bilingual Ukrainian–Russian television shows.’ International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2010(201), 105–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomberg.com. 2018. ‘OPEC output falls to lowest in a year amid Venezuela woes.’ April, 3. Online at <https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-03/opec-output-falls-to-lowest-in-a-year-as-venezuela-s-woes-deepen> (Accessed April 5, 2018).+(Accessed+April+5,+2018).>Google Scholar
Bloomberg.com. 2018. ‘Iran rejects compromise as OPEC heads for battle in Vienna.’ June, 19. Online at <https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-19/iran-rejects-compromise-as-opec-heads-for-battle-in-vienna> (Accessed June 21, 2018).+(Accessed+June+21,+2018).>Google Scholar
Callahan, E., & Herring, S. C. 2012. ‘Language choice on university websites: Longitudinal trends.’ International Journal of Communication, 6, 322–355.Google Scholar
Compendium of Language Management in Canada. 2018. ‘Official Languages Act (1969).’ Online at <https://www.uottawa.ca/clmc/official-languages-act-1969> (Accessed March 22, 2018).+(Accessed+March+22,+2018).>Google Scholar
Dumanig, F. P., David, M. K. & Shanmuganathan, T. 2013. ‘Language choice and language policies in Filipino-Malaysian families in multilingual Malaysia.’ Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34(6), 582–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F. & Fennig, C. D. (eds.) 2019. Ethnologue: Languages of the World (22nd edn.) Dallas: SIL International. Online at <http://www.ethnologue.com> (Accessed March 22, 2019)Google Scholar
Eno, M. A., Dammak, A. & Eno, O. A. 2016. ‘From linguistic imperialism to language domination.’ Journal of Somali Studies, 3(1–2), 9–52.Google Scholar
European Union. 2018. ‘EU administration – staff, languages and location.’ Online at <https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/figures/administration_en> (Accessed October 10, 2018)+(Accessed+October+10,+2018)>Google Scholar
European Union. 2019. ‘European Parliament.’ Online at <https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/institutions-bodies/european-parliament_en> (Accessed March 22, 2019)+(Accessed+March+22,+2019)>Google Scholar
Finsen, S. B. 2016. ‘The Power of Language: Language policies of international institutions.’ Unpublished MA thesis. Reykjavik: University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Heller, M. 1992. ‘The politics of codeswitching and language choice.’ Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 13(1 & 2), 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, J. 2003. ‘English as a lingua franca: A threat to multilingualism?’ Journal of sociolinguistics, 7(4), 556–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahili, I. 2014. ‘“It's pretty simple and in Greek … ”: Global and local languages in the Greek corporate setting.’ Multilingua, 33(1–2), 117–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardell, M. 2006. ‘French pride tested at EU summit.’ BBC News, March, 24. Online at <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4842734.stm> (Accessed January 15, 2007).+(Accessed+January+15,+2007).>Google Scholar
McEntee-Atalianis, L. J. 2017. ‘“Leave no one behind”: Linguistic and digital barriers to the dissemination and implementation of the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals.’ Language Problems and Language Planning, 41(3), 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowbray, J. 2010. ‘Language in the UN and EU: Linguistic Diversity as a Challenge for Multilateralism.’ NZJPIL, 8, 91.Google Scholar
Myers–Scotton, C. 1989. ‘Codeswitching with English: types of switching, types of communities.’ World Englishes, 8(3), 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, C. & Bolonyai, A. 2001. ‘Calculating speakers: Codeswitching in a rational choice model.’ Language in Society, 30(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarrete, J. E. 2001. ‘Letter dated 11 June 2001 from the permanent representative of Mexico to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General.’ <Online at http://www.un.org/documents/ga/docs/56/a5693.pdf> (Accessed January 6, 2016.)+(Accessed+January+6,+2016.)>Google Scholar
Nick, S. 2001. ‘Use of language in diplomacy.’ In Jovan, K. & Slavik, H. (eds.), Language and Diplomacy. Geneva: Diplo Foundation, pp. 39–47.Google Scholar
Okudaira, A. 1999. ‘A study on international communication in regional organizations: The use of English as the “official” language of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN).’ Asian Englishes, 2(1), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oltermann, P. 2013. ‘Something in common: Should English be the official language of the EU?’ The Guardian, April 24. Online at <http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/apr/24/europa-english-official-language-eu/> (Accessed April 5, 2015).+(Accessed+April+5,+2015).>Google Scholar
Sabourin, P. & Bélanger, A. 2014. ‘Microsimulation of language characteristics and language choice in multilingual regions with high immigration.’ Proceedings of the Sixth Eurostat/UNECE Work Session on Demographic Projections, pp. 443–456.Google Scholar
Sharkey, H. J. 2008. ‘Arab identity and ideology in Sudan: The politics of language, ethnicity, and race.’ African Affairs, 107(426), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonkin, H. 2008. ‘Language policy and language practice at the international level: Toward a research agenda.’ Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Linguistics Association, SUNY, Old Westbury.Google Scholar
Tonkin, H. 2011. ‘Language and the United Nations: A preliminary review.’ Online at <http://www.esperanto-un.org/images/languages-un-tonkin-draft-dec2011.pdf> (Accessed January 15, 2018)+(Accessed+January+15,+2018)>Google Scholar
United Nations. 2004. ‘United Nations General Assembly 59th Session.’ Online at <https://www.un.org/webcast/ga/59/index.shtml> (Accessed November 14, 2009).+(Accessed+November+14,+2009).>Google Scholar
United Nations. 2006. ‘United Nations General Assembly 61st Session.’ Online at <https://www.un.org/webcast/ga/61/index.shtml> (Accessed November 23, 2009).+(Accessed+November+23,+2009).>Google Scholar
United Nations. 2008. ‘United Nations General Assembly 63rd Session.’ Online at <https://www.un.org/en/ga/63/generaldebate/23sept08.shtml> (Accessed November 14, 2009).+(Accessed+November+14,+2009).>Google Scholar
United Nations. 2010. ‘United Nations General Assembly 65th Session.’ Online at <https://gadebate.un.org/en/sessions-archive/65/> (Accessed July 21, 2013.)+(Accessed+July+21,+2013.)>Google Scholar
United Nations. 2012. ‘United Nations General Assembly 67th Session.’ Online at <http://gadebate.un.org/sessions-archive/67/> (Accessed July 21, 2013.)+(Accessed+July+21,+2013.)>Google Scholar
United Nations. 2014. ‘United Nations General Assembly 69th Session.’ Online at <https://gadebate.un.org/en/sessions-archive/69/> (Accessed January 30, 2015).+(Accessed+January+30,+2015).>Google Scholar
United Nations. 2016. ‘United Nations General Assembly 71st Session.’ Online at <https://gadebate.un.org/en/sessions-archive/71/> (Accessed December 21, 2017).+(Accessed+December+21,+2017).>Google Scholar
United Nations. 2018 ‘United Nations General Assembly 73rd Session.’ Online at <https://gadebate.un.org/en/sessions-archive/73/> (Accessed March 22, 2019).+(Accessed+March+22,+2019).>Google Scholar
United Nations. 2019. ‘Main organs.’ Online at <https://www.un.org/en/sections/about-un/main-organs/> (Accessed March 22, 2019)+(Accessed+March+22,+2019)>Google Scholar
Voicu, I. 2002. ‘Re-Visiting multilingualism in diplomatic fora.’ ABAC Journal, 22(2), 1–27.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., Krzyżanowski, M. & Forchtner, B. 2012. ‘The interplay of language ideologies and contextual cues in multilingual interactions: Language choice and code-switching in European Union institutions.’ Language in Society, 41(2), 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. 2009. ‘The elephant in the room: Language issues in the European Union.’ European Journal of Language Policy, 1, 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar