This paper is concerned with the progress of Trygve Haavelmo's
research and with his activities in general during his stay in the United
States from June 1939 until the publication of his thesis “The
Probability Approach in Econometrics” (Haavelmo, 1944, Econometrica 12, Suppl. 1–118) in
July 1944. His original intention had been to stay in the United States
only until the end of 1940, but the outbreak of World War II and the
German occupation of Norway left him stranded. His “Theory and
Measurement” treatise (Haavelmo, 1941,
“On the Theory and Measurement of Economic Relations,”
hectograph), the first version of “The Probability Approach,”
was completed by the middle of 1941. From 1942 Haavelmo worked in New York
for the Norwegian government in exile and was called upon to present his
ideas to econometricians. Throughout his time in the United States he
argued that probability should be accepted as an integral part of economic
theory and as a basis for verification in economics. This paper considers
how much of Haavelmo's approach was the result of his prewar
experiences and how much the result of his time in the United States. It
elaborates on his contact with Jerzy Neyman, Abraham Wald, and Jakob
Marschak and the circumstances leading to the publication of “The
Probability Approach.” Haavelmo's activities have been tracked
through letters, seminar notes, and a reconstruction of his itinerary. The
paper is a sequel to Bjerkholt (2005,
Econometric Theory 21, 491–533).The presentation owes very much indeed to the advice of three
anonymous referees and to the editor Peter Phillips, as the result of
which it was restructured, reformulated, and much improved. I am sincerely
grateful to all of these individuals for their generous and constructive
advice. The source material for the paper is to a large extent
correspondence and documents from the Haavelmo Archive at the Department
of Economics, University of Oslo, as organized by Tore Thonstad. It also
draws on material from the Frisch correspondence files at the National
Library of Norway and from the Frisch Archive at the Department of
Economics, University of Oslo. I am most grateful to Wendy Glickman of the
Rockefeller Archive Center for providing me with copies of the monitoring
sheets on Haavelmo. I owe my colleague Tore Schweder thanks for very
helpful advice. I have furthermore benefited from personal communication
with Ted Anderson, Kenneth J. Arrow, Leo Hurwicz, Eilev S. Jansen,
Lawrence R. Klein, J.J. Polak, and Paul A. Samuelson, for which I am most
grateful. NBER's Claudia Goldin, Chris Nagorski, and Robert Lipsey
helped me sort out some puzzles. Thanks are also due to Lesney Levene for
invaluable linguistic advice and to Inger Bjerkodden for encouragement all
along. The responsibility for all remaining errors (surely, a nonempty
set) is entirely my own.