Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T17:56:42.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SPECIFICATION TESTING IN MODELS WITH MANY INSTRUMENTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2010

Abstract

This paper studies the asymptotic validity of the Anderson–Rubin (AR) test and the J test for overidentifying restrictions in linear models with many instruments. When the number of instruments increases at the same rate as the sample size, we establish that the conventional AR and J tests are asymptotically incorrect. Some versions of these tests, which are developed for situations with moderately many instruments, are also shown to be asymptotically invalid in this framework. We propose modifications of the AR and J tests that deliver asymptotically correct sizes. Importantly, the corrected tests are robust to the numerosity of the moment conditions in the sense that they are valid for both few and many instruments. The simulation results illustrate the excellent properties of the proposed tests.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank the co-editor Richard Smith, two referees, and Bruce Hansen for very useful comments and suggestions. The second author gratefully acknowledges financial support from FQRSC and SSHRC.

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, T.G. & Sorensen, B.E. (1996) GMM estimation of a stochastic volatility model: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 14, 328352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D.W. & Stock, J.H. (2007) Testing with many weak instruments. Journal of Econometrics 138, 2446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, J.D. & Krueger, A.B. (1991) Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings? Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 9791014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an applications to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58, 277297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekker, P.A. (1994) Alternative approximations to the distributions of instrumental variable estimators. Econometrica 62, 657681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, C. & Eichenbaum, M. (1996) Small-sample properties of GMM-based Wald tests. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 14, 294308.Google Scholar
Chao, J. & Swanson, N. (2005) Consistent estimation with a large number of weak instruments. Econometrica 73, 16731692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, S.G., Imbens, G.W., & Newey, W.K. (2003) Empirical likelihood estimation and consistent tests with conditional moment restrictions. Journal of Econometrics 117, 5593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, J.M. & Taamouti, M. (2007) Further results on projection-based inference in IV regressions with weak, collinear or missing instruments. Journal of Econometrics 139, 133153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, C., Hausman, J., & Newey, W.K. (2008) Estimation with many instrumental variables. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 26, 398422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelejian, H.H. & Prucha, I.R. (2001) On the asymptotic distribution of the Moran I test statistic with applications. Journal of Econometrics 104, 219257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenker, R. & Machado, J.A.F. (1999) GMM inference when the number of moment conditions is large. Journal of Econometrics 93, 327344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledoit, O. & Wolf, M. (2004) A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 88, 365411.Google Scholar
Newey, W.K. (2004) Many Instrument Asymptotics. Manuscript, MIT.Google Scholar
Peiser, A.M. (1943) Asymptotic formulas for significance levels of certain distributions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 14, 5662.Google Scholar
Silverstein, J.W. (1995) Strong convergence of the empirical distribution of eigenvalues of large dimensional random matrices. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 55, 331339.Google Scholar