Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:19:03.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION FOR INVARIANT TESTS OF A UNIT ROOT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2007

Patrick Marsh
Patrick Marsh
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers the information available to invariant unit root tests at and near the unit root. Because all invariant tests will be functions of the maximal invariant, the Fisher information in this statistic will be the available information. The main finding of the paper is that the available information for all tests invariant to a linear trend is zero at the unit root. This result applies for any sample size, over a variety of distributions and correlation structures, and is robust to the inclusion of any other deterministic component. In addition, an explicit upper bound upon the power of all invariant unit root tests is shown to depend solely upon the information. This bound is illustrated via a brief simulation study that also examines the impact that different invariance requirements have on power.Thanks are due to Francesco Bravo, Giovanni Forchini, Les Godfrey, Robert Taylor, participants at seminars at the Universities of Birmingham and York and at the ESRC Econometric study group conference, Bristol, 2004, and also to Bruce Hansen, Joel Horowitz, and five anonymous referees. Revisions of this paper have greatly benefited from comments and suggestions from Grant Hillier and Peter Phillips.

Type
Research Article
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , August 2007 , pp. 686 - 710
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abadir, K.M. (1993) On the asymptotic power of unit root tests. Econometric Theory 9, 189–221.Google Scholar
Bunzel, H. & T.J. Vogelsang (2003) Powerful Trend Function Tests That Are Robust to Strong Serial Correlation with an Application to the Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis. Mimeo, Cornell University.
Chan, N.H. & C.Z. Wei (1987) Asymptotic inference for nearly nonstationary AR(1) processes. Annals of Statistics 15, 1050–1063.Google Scholar
DeJong, D.N., J.C. Nankervis, N.E. Savin, & C.H. Whiteman (1992) Integration versus trend stationarity in time series. Econometrica 60, 423–433.Google Scholar
Dufour, J.-M. & M.L. King (1991) Optimal invariant tests for the autocorrelation coefficient in linear regressions with stationary or nonstationary AR(1) errors. Journal of Econometrics 47, 115–143.Google Scholar
Durlauf, S.N. & P.C.B. Phillips (1988) Trends versus random walks in time series analysis. Econometrica 56, 1333–1354.Google Scholar
Efron, B. (1975) Defining the curvature of a statistical problem (with applications to second order efficiency). Annals of Statistics 3, 1189–1242.Google Scholar
Elliott, G., T.J. Rothenberg, & J.H. Stock (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64, 813–836.Google Scholar
Forchini, G. & P.W. Marsh (2000) Exact Inference for the Unit Root Hypothesis. Discussion Paper in Economics 00/54, University of York.
Kallenberg, W.C.M. (1981) The shortcoming of locally most powerful tests in curved exponential families. Annals of Statistics 9, 673–677.Google Scholar
Kariya, T. (1980) Locally robust tests for serial correlation in least squares regression. Annals of Statistics 8, 1065–1070.Google Scholar
King, M.L. (1980) Robust tests for spherical symmetry and their application to least squares regression. Annals of Statistics 8, 1265–1271.Google Scholar
Lehmann, E.L. (1997) Testing Statistical Hypotheses, 2nd ed., Springer Texts in Statistics. Springer-Verlag.
Leybourne, S.J., T.C. Mills, & P. Newbold (1998) Spurious rejections by Dickey–Fuller tests in the presence of a break under the null. Journal of Econometrics 87, 191–203.Google Scholar
Marsh, P.W.N. (2005) A Measure of Distance for the Unit Root Hypothesis. Discussion Paper in Economics 05/03, University of York.
Müller, U.K. & G. Elliott (2003) Tests for unit roots and the initial condition. Econometrica 71, 1269–1286.Google Scholar
Perron, P. (1989) The Great Crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57, 1361–1401 (Erratum, 61, 248–249).Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. (1987) Towards a unified asymptotic theory for autoregression. Biometrika 74, 535–547.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. (1998) New tools for understanding spurious regressions. Econometrica 66, 1299–1325.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. & T. Magdalinos (2007) Limit theory for moderate deviations from a unit root. Journal of Econometrics 136, 115–130.Google Scholar
Ploberger, W. & P.C.B. Phillips (2002) Rissanen's theorem and econometric time series. In A. Zellner, H.A. Keuzenkamp, & M. McAleer (eds.), Simplicity, Inference and Modelling, pp. 165–180. Cambridge University Press.
Ploberger, W. & P.C.B. Phillips (2003) Empirical limits for time series econometric models. Econometrica 71, 627–673.Google Scholar
Rao, C.R. (1945) Information and accuracy attainable in the estimation of statistical parameters. Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society 37, 81–89.Google Scholar
Sargan, J.D. & A. Bhargava (1983) Testing residuals from least squares regression for being generated by the Gaussian random walk. Econometrica 51, 153–174.Google Scholar
Vogelsang, T.J. (1998) Trend function hypothesis testing in the presence of serial correlation parameters. Econometrica 65, 123–148.Google Scholar
Würtz, A. (1997) A Universal Upper Bound on Power Functions. Discussion Paper 97/17, University of New South Wales.
Zivot, E. & D.W.K. Andrews (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 10, 251–270.Google Scholar