Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:58:28.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Caddis-flies (Insecta: Trichoptera) from the Insect Limestone (Bembridge Marls, Late Eocene) of the Isle of Wight, UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2014

Irina D. Sukatsheva
Irina D. Sukatsheva*
Affiliation:
Palaeontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia. Email [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The trichopteran assemblage of the Late Eocene Bembridge Marls is revised. six species in five genera and four families are identified, with four species and two genera described as new: (Beraeidae: Beraeodes vectensis Cockerell, 1921 and B. anglicus Cockerell, 1921; Phryganeidae: Bembridgea insularia gen. sp. nov.; Polycentropodidae: ?Plectrocnemia incompleta Sukatsheva, sp. nov.; Philopotamidae: Wormaldia longaeva Sukatsheva, sp. nov.; incertae familiae: Paleodicella anomala Sukatsheva, gen. sp. nov.). The assemblage is unique in being absolutely dominated by the generally uncommon family Beraeidae, and particularly by the single species Beraeodes vectensis. Except for a representative of ubiquitous Phryganaeidae, all the caddis-flies recorded apparently had oxy- and psychrophilous larvae confined to springs and cold streams (or else mosses near water), thus indicating the absence of fresh lakes or slow running waters near the depositional water body.

Keywords

Beraeidaefossil insectsPhilopotamidaePhryganeidaePolycentropodidae
Type
Articles
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 104 , Issue 3-4: The Fauna and Flora of the Insect Limestone (late Eocene), Isle of Wight, UK Volume I , September 2013 , pp. 327 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

5. References

Andersen, T. & Kjaerandsen, J. 1997. Notoernodes inornatus new genus, new species, first Beraeidae (Trichoptera) to be described from the Afrotropical region. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Trichoptera 8, 3–4.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1939. New genera and species of Neuropteroid insects. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harward 85, 440–504.Google Scholar
Botosaneanu, L. 1995. Caddis Flies (Trichoptera) from Turonian (Upper Cretaceous) Amber of new Jersey. American Museum Novitates 3140, 4–7.Google Scholar
Botosaneanu, L., Nozaki, T. & Kagaya, T. 1995. Nippoboraea, gen.n.for Ernodes gracilis Nozaki et Kagaya, 1995 (Trichoptera: Beraeidae). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N.S.) 31, 179–84.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1916. Some American fossil insects. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 51, 89–136.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1921. Fossil Arthropods in the British Museum-VI. Oligocene insects from Gurnet Bay, Isle of Wight. Annals and Magazin of Natural History, Ninth Series 7, 453–80.Google Scholar
Eaton, A. E. 1867. On some British Neuroptera. Annals and Magazin of Natural History, Third Series 19, 395–401.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1775. Systema Entomologiae, sistens insectorum classes, ordines genera, species, adiectus synonymus, locis, descriptionibus, observations. Flensburg et Lipsiae: Offic.libr. Kortii. 832 pp.Google Scholar
Gale, A. S., Huggett, J. M., Pälike, H., Laurie, E., Hailwood, E. A. & Hardenbol, J. 2006. Correlation of Eocene–Oligocene marine and continental records: orbital cyclicity, magnetostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy of the Solent Group, Isle of Wight, UK. Journal of the Geological Society, London 163, 401–15.Google Scholar
Hagen, H. A. 1856. Bernstein Befindlichen Neuropteren der Vorwelt. In Berendt, 's Organische Reste der Verwelt 2(2), 41–126. Berlin: Nicolai.Google Scholar
Hooker, J. J., Collinson, M. E., Grimes, S. T., Sille, N. P. & Mattey, D. P. 2007. Discussion on the Eocene–Oligocene boundary in the UK. Journal of the Geological Society 164, 685–88.Google Scholar
Hooker, J. J., Grimes, S. T., Mattey, D. P., Collinson, M. E. & Sheldon, N. D. 2009. Refined correlation of the UK Late Eocene–Early Oligocene Solent Group and timing of its climate history. In Koeberl, C. & Montanari, A. (eds) The Late Eocene Earth – Hothouse, Icehouse, and Impacts. Geological Society of America Special Paper 452, 179–95.Google Scholar
ICZN. 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th ed. London: International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. xxix+306 pp.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. D. & Melnitsky, S. I. 2005. New Caddisflies Species of the Genus Wormaldia (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae) from Baltic Amber. Paleontological Journal 39, 284–88.Google Scholar
Kirby, W.F. 1815. An Introduction to Entomology. 1–2. London: Longman. 512+517 pp.Google Scholar
Kolenati, F. A. 1848. Genera et species Trichopterorum. 1. Heteropalpoidea. Acta Regiae Bohemoslovenicae Societatis Scientiarum, Prague 6, 1–108.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1815. Entomology. In Brewster, 's “Edinburgh Encyclopaedia” 9(1), 52–172.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1761. Fauna Suecica sistens animalia Sueciae regni. Ed.2. Stockholmiae: Laur. Salvii. Widmung, Vorrede etc. ohne Seitenzahl. 578 pp.Google Scholar
Malicky, H. 1983. Atlas of European Trichoptera. The Hague: Junk. x+298 pp.Google Scholar
Martynov, A. V. 1924. Preliminary revision of the family Phryganeidae, its classification and evolution. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 9(14), 209–24.Google Scholar
McLachlan, R. 1864. On the Trichopterous genus Polycentropus and the allied genera, Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 1, 25–31.Google Scholar
McLachlan, R. 1865. Trichoptera Britannica. A monograph of British trichopteous insects. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, Third Series 5, 1–184.Google Scholar
McLachlan, R. 1868. Contributions to a knowledge of European Trichoptera. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1868, 289–308.Google Scholar
McLachlan, R. 1871. On new forms, etc., of extra-European trichopterous insects. Journal of the Linnean Society, Zoology 11, 98–141.Google Scholar
McLachlan, R. 1877–1880. A Monographic Revision and Synopsis of the Trichoptera of the European Fauna. London. Parts I–IX with supplements. 523 pp.Google Scholar
Mey, W. 1986. Die Köcherfliegen des Sachsischen Bernsteins (II). (Trichoptera). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift, N.F. 33, 241–48.Google Scholar
Mey, W. 1988. Die Köcherfliegen des Sachsischen Bernsteins (III). (Trichoptera). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift, N.F. 35, 299–309.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. W. 2003. The fossils of Florissant. Washington and London: Smithsonian Books. 258 pp.Google Scholar
Morse, J. C. 2006. The Trichoptera World Checklist. http://entweb.clemson.edu/database/trichopt/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Mosely, M. E. 1930. A new Genus allied to Beraea Stephens (Trichoptera). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Tenth Series 6, 392–98.Google Scholar
Mosely, M. E. 1931. New Corsican Trichoptera. Entomologist 64, 253–54.Google Scholar
Perkovsky, E. E., Rasnitsyn, A. P., Vlaskin, A. P. & Taraschuk, M. V. 2007. A comparative analysis of the Baltic and Rovno amber arthropod faunas: representative samples. African Invertebrates 47(1), 229–45.Google Scholar
Pictet, F. J. 1834. Recherches pour server a l'Histoire et a l'anatomie des Phryganides. Geneve. 235 pp.Google Scholar
Rambur, J. P. 1842. Septième Section, les Trichoptères (Trichoptera), Kirby. In Rambur, J. P. Histoire Naturelle des Insectes Névroptères, 463–518. Paris: Librarie Encyclopédique de Roret. xviii+534 pp.Google Scholar
Ross, H. H. 1949. A classification of the Nearctic species of Wormaldia and Dolophiloides (Trichoptera, Philopotamidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 51, 154–60.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. F. 1829. A Systematical Catalogue of British Insects. London: Baldwin. 416 pp.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. F. 1833. The Nomenclature of British Insects being a Compendious List of such Species as are contained in the Systematic Catalogue of British Insects. Second edition. London: Baldwin. 136 pp.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. F. 1836. Illustrations of British Entomology. Mandibulata 6, 151–68. London: Baldwin & Cradock.Google Scholar
Ulmer, G. 1906. Neuer Beitrag zur Kenntnis ausser europäischer Trichopteren. Leiden Museum Notes 28, 1–116.Google Scholar
Ulmer, G. 1912. Die Trichopteren des baltischen Bernsteins. Beiträgen zur Naturkunde Preussens 10, 1–380.Google Scholar
Wallengren, H. D. 1891. Skandinavian Neuroptera. Andra afdelningen. Svenska Akademiens Handbook 24(10), 1–173.Google Scholar
Wichard, W. 2013. Overview and descriptions of Trichoptera in Baltic amber. Spicipalpia and Integripalpia. Remagen-Oberwinter: Verlag Dr. Kassel. 228 pp.Google Scholar
Wichard, W. & Poinar, G. O. 2005. Köcherfliegen aus dem Burma Bernstein der oberen Kreide von Myanmar (Insecta, Trichoptera). Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg 89, 129–36.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G. B. 1978. Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 401 pp.Google Scholar