Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:20:48.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing a Consensus Framework for an Effective and Efficient Disaster Response Health System: A National Call to Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Abstract

Eighteen national organizations, representing medicine, dentistry, nursing, hospital systems, public health, and emergency medical services, have worked together to create a framework for a national and regional disaster response health system that is scalable, multidisciplinary, and seamless, and based on an all-hazards approach. In July 2005 and June 2006 the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Public Health Association (APHA) convened the AMA/APHA Linkages Leadership Summit, with funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under the Terrorism Injuries: Information Dissemination and Exchange (TIIDE) program. As cofacilitators, James J. James, MD, DrPH, MHA, director of the AMA Center for Public Health Preparedness and Disaster Response, and Georges Benjamin, MD, FACP, FACEP(E), APHA executive director, met with leaders from 16 national medical, dental, hospital, nursing, hospital systems, public health, and emergency medical services organizations in Chicago (2005) and New Orleans (2006) to deliberate the deficiencies in the medical and public health disaster response system and the lack of necessary linkages between key components of this system: the health care, emergency medical services, and public health sectors. The goal was to reach consensus on a set of overarching recommendations to improve and sustain health system preparedness and to combine each organization's advocacy expertise and experience to promote a shared policy agenda. The full summit report contains 53 consensus-based recommendations, which will serve as the framework for a coordinated national agenda for strengthening health system preparedness for terrorism and other disasters. The 9 most overarching critical recommendations from the report are highlighted here. Although the summit report presents important perspectives on the subject of preparedness for public health emergencies, we must understand that preparedness is a process and that these recommendations must be reviewed and refined continually over time. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2007;1(Suppl 1):S51–S54)

Type
Special Focus
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the US Health System. Emergency Care for Children: Growing Pains. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.Google Scholar
2.Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the US Health System. Emergency Medical Services At the Crossroads. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.Google Scholar
3.Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the US Health System. Hospital-based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.Google Scholar
4. The White House. The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned. http://www.whitehouse.gov/reports/katrina-lessons-learned.pdf. Published February 2006. Accessed July 18, 2007.Google Scholar
5.A Failure of Initiative: Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina, US House of Representatives. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2006.Google Scholar
6. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate. Hurricane Katrina: A Nation Still Unprepared. http://hsgac.senate.gov/index.cfm?Fuseaction=Links.Katrina. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Published September 2006.Google Scholar
7. US Government Accountability Office. Catastrophic Disasters: Enhanced Leadership, Capabilities, and Accountability Controls will Improve the Effectiveness of the Nation's Preparedness, Response, and Recovery System. GAO-06-618. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06618.pdf. Washington, DC: USGAO; 2006.Google Scholar