Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:51:51.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preventing Tragedy: Balancing Physicians' Ethical Obligations to Patients and the Public

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Emily E. Anderson ,
Lee J. Black  and
Nathan A. Bostick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recent shootings at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) suggest that an increased reliance upon the medical community to support public health violence prevention efforts may be warranted. As physicians are called upon to support these efforts, they must effectively balance their obligations to promote public safety with their traditional obligations to promote the best interests of their individual patients. To meet these concurrent ethical obligations, physicians' participation in public health violence prevention should seek to improve public safety without compromising the care of patients or exposing individuals to undue harm. Physicians should, therefore, report to the appropriate authorities those patients who are at risk of committing violent acts toward the public, but should only disclose the minimal amount of information that is necessary to protect the public. Moreover, physicians should also recommend the separation of violent individuals from the community at large when necessary to improve public safety while advocating for the provision of appropriate treatment measures to improve the patients' well-being. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2007;1(Suppl 1):S38–S42)

Keywords

physicians' ethical obligationspatient confidentialitypublic health violence preventionindividual rights
Type
Special Focus
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 1 , Issue S1 , September 2007 , pp. S38 - S42
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Associated Press. Virginia Tech panel fighting to get records. May 23, 2007. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070523/ap_on_re_us/virginia_tech_investigation_2;_ylt=AtM5aIzZ9BvAZJlFSb86FwOm1OFF. Accessed June 5, 2007.Google Scholar
2. Virginia Tech Review Panel. http://www.vtreviewpanel.org. Accessed June 5, 2007.Google Scholar
3. Turque B, Horwitz S. Kaine gives panel latitude to probe campus killings. Washington Post. April 20, 2007. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/19/AR2007041900830.html. Accessed June 5, 2007.Google Scholar
4. Virginia Tech Review Panel. Comments by Charles W. Steger, President, Virginia Tech, May 10, 2007. http://www.vtreviewpanel.org/docs/2007/may/president_notes.html. Accessed June 5, 2007.Google Scholar
5.Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF.Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
6.Moore, MH. Violence prevention: criminal justice or public health. Beauchamp DE, Steinbock B New Ethics for the Public's Health. New York: Oxford University Press;1999:200–206.Google Scholar
7.Mercy, JA, Rosenberg, ML, Powell, KE, et al Public health policy for preventing violence. Beauchamp DE, Steinbock B. New Ethics for the Public's Health. New York:Oxford University Press;1999: 188–199.Google Scholar
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. The Public Health Approach to Violence Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/dvp/PublicHealthApproachToViolencePrevention.htm. Accessed July 18, 2007.Google Scholar
9.Lipsey, MW, Derzon, JH. Predictors of violent and serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: a synthesis of longitudinal research. In: Loeber R, Farrington DP, eds Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications;1998:86–105.Google Scholar
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Fact Sheet: Understanding Youth Violence. http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/pub-res/YVFactSheet.pdf. Accessed July 18, 2007.Google Scholar
11. American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Opinion E-5.05, “Confidentiality.” http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/8353.html. Accessed July 18, 2007.Google Scholar
12. American Psychiatric Association. The Principles of Medical Ethics With Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry. http://www.psych.org/psych_pract/ethics/ppaethics.cfm. Accessed July 18, 2007.Google Scholar
13. American Psychological Association. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html#4_05. Accessed July 18, 2007.Google Scholar
14.Kipnis, K.A defense of unqualified medical confidentiality. Am J Bioethics. 2006;6:7–18.Google Scholar
15.Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 551 P. 2d 334 (Ca. 1976).Google Scholar
16.Opinions and Reports of the Judicial Council. Chicago: American Medical Association;1972.Google Scholar
17.Lake, P, Tribbensee, N.The emerging crisis of college student suicide: law and policy responses to serious forms of self-inflicted injury. Stetson Law Rev. 2002;32:125.Google Scholar
18. Minn. Stat. § 148.975 (2006).Google Scholar
19. Fla. Stat. ch. 490.0147 (2006).Google Scholar