Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T19:33:23.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Making the World Safe for Liberalism*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Arthur Ripstein
Affiliation:
Erindale College, University of Toronto

Extract

‘Liberal’ is still a term of abuse in US presidential politics and certain academic circles. But gone for now are the days when liberals were saddled with responsibility for (depending on who was making the accusation) crime, promiscuity or crass concern with material wealth. Instead, competing political visions increasingly do battle for the right to carry the liberal banner.

Type
Critical Notices/Études critiques
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Kymlicka, Will, Liberalism, Community and Culture (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), p. 4.Google Scholar

2 I suspect that Kymlicka is running together two distinct senses of the term ‘responsibility’ here. One is a notion of metaphysical responsibility, the other of being held responsible for the cost of something. The former is tied up with the idea that people are free to revise their ends, the latter with the need for someone to bear the costs of various events. The former tempts Kymlicka to the idea that choices must be informed if people are to be responsible for them, the latter to the idea that individuals are responsible only for the opportunity costs, to others, of their choices. The former looks as if it can be made sense of apart from any assumptions about what is being chosen, but is without implications for issues of distributive justice. The latter, in turn, has implications only if we attend to the specific goods being chosen.

3 Rodgers v. Elliot, (1888) 146 Mass. 349; Vaughn v. Menlove, (1837) 3 Bing. N.C. 467 (C.P.). I am grateful to Ernest Weinrib for drawing my attention to these cases.

4 Markets represent a sphere in which most ways of putting others at risk of financial loss (through competition) do not give rise to individual liability.

5 Or, rather, if it is political, it is in a broader sense of that term than is the traditional concern of a nation state seeking to treat its citizens as equal.

6 Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 329.Google Scholar

7 I am grateful to David Dyzenhaus and Will Kymlicka for helpful comments on an earlier draft.