Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:12:30.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resilience and vulnerability in children of multiple-risk families

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2009

Marian Radke-Yarrow  and
Earnestine Brown
Marian Radke-Yarrow*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Developmental Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health
Earnestine Brown
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Developmental Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Marian Radke-Yarrow, Laboratory of Developmental Psychology, NIMH, NIH, Building 15K, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Under high-risk conditions of genetic and family environmental origins, some children maintain a high level of adaptive behavior, whereas others develop serious problems. What distinguishes these children? Using measures systematically obtained in a 10-year longitudinal study, standard case studies were developed on 18 resilient children with healthy adaptation throughout development (psychiatric assessment) and on 26 troubled children with serious persistent problems. All children had family risks of affective illness in both parents and a highly chaotic and disturbed family life. Well children of well parents and well-functioning families were a comparison group. The children were preadolescent or adolescent at the time of most recent assessment. The ill and well families had similar demographic characteristics. Resilient and control children were very similar on most measures. Troubled children as a group had lower scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Revised, were more often shy, had poor academic achievement, and had a history of poor peer relationships. Resilient children elicited more positive reactions from teachers, were more likely to be the favored child in the family, and had more positive self-perceptions. Profiles of each child showed competing processes of vulnerability and coping. Children used a wide range of methods for coping with parental and family pathology. Resilience appeared variably robust or fragile depending on the combinations of risks and supportive factors present and the styles of coping with stress.

Type
Research Article
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , Fall 1993 , pp. 581 - 592
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1979). The child behavior profile: II. Boys aged 6–11 and 12–16. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 47, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anthony, E. J., & Cohler, B. J. (1987). The invulnerable child. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Beardslee, W. R., & Podorefsky, D. (1988). Resilient adolescents whose parents have serious affective and other psychiatric disorders: Importance of selfunderstanding and relationships. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145(1), 36–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Brown, G., & Harris, T. (1978). Social origins of depression: A study of psychiatric disorders in women. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Endicott, J., Andreasen, N., & Spitzer, R. L. (1975). Family history research diagnostic criteria. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research.Google Scholar
Garmezy, N. (1985). Stress-resistant children: The search for protective factors. In Stevenson, J. E. (Eds.), Recent research in developmental psychopathology (pp. 213–233). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Garmezy, N., & Rutter, M. (Eds.). (1983). Stress, coping and development in children. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Harter, S. (1979). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 58, 87–97.Google Scholar
Hodges, K., Kline, J., Fitch, P., McKnew, D., & Cytryn, L. (1981). The child assessment schedule: A diagnostic interview for research and clinical use. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 11, 56.Google Scholar
Kaufman, C., Gruenbaum, H., Cohler, B., & Gameo, E. (1979). Superkids: Competent children of psychotic mothers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 136(11), 1398–1402.Google Scholar
Luthar, S. (1991). Vulnerability and resilience: A study of high risk adolescents. Child Development, 62, 600–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luthar, S., Zigler, E., & Goldstein, D. (1992). Methodological and conceptual issues in research on childhood resilience. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33(2), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masten, A. S., Best, K. M., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L. B., & Moriarty, A. (1976). Vulnerability, coping and growth: From infancy to adolescence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, D. (1982). Life stress interview: Events and chronic difficulties. Unpublished manual, The Catholic University of America, Department of Psychology, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Radke-Yarrow, M., Nottelmann, E., Martinez, P., Fox, M., & Belmont, B. (1992). Young children of affectively ill parents: A longitudinal study of psychosocial development. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescence Psychiatry, 31(1),' 68–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radke-Yarrow, M., & Sherman, T. L. (1990). Hard growing: Children who survive. In Rolf, J. E., Masten, A. S., Cicchetti, D., Nuechterlein, K., & Weintraub, S. (Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology (pp. 97–119). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, W., & Welner, Z. (1988). Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescence (DICA-R). Unpublished manuscript, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
Rolf, J. E., Masten, A. S., Cicchetti, D., Nuechterlein, K., & Weintraub, S. (Eds.). (1990). Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, M. (1985). Resilience in the face of adversity. British Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 598–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R. L., & Endicott, J. (1977). The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia: Lifetime Version. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Gibbon, M., & First, M. B. (1989). Structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R-Non – Patient Version. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research.Google Scholar
Wechsler, S. (1974). Scale for children – Revised. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1989). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: Adams, Bannister and Cox.Google Scholar