2.1. Step 1: literature review

The initial stage involved identifying pertinent topics by conducting a literature review that examined the impact of digital technologies on African urban regions.

This literature review employed the Web of Science database because of its comprehensive and reputable collection of scholarly contributions. The search query involved combining key concepts: technology-related terms like “digital technology” and “smart technology,” terms associated with African cities such as “African cities,” and social impact-related terms like “social issues” and “social impacts.”

The query structure employed the Boolean operator “AND” to interconnect the three core concepts and “OR” to encompass research articles. The actual query on Web of Science was as follows: TITLE-ABS-KEY (["Digital technology" OR “smart technology”] AND ["African cities"] AND ["social issues" OR “social impacts”]).

The search on the Web of Science database initially yielded 110 articles, of which 93 remained after excluding reviews, conference reviews, and letters. Additionally, gray literature, including press articles, books, reports, and working papers, was explored to ensure a comprehensive viewpoint, encompassing both French and English language resources.

From this exploratory process, 33 documents were selected for review, based on their direct relevance and articulation regarding the impact of digital technologies in African Cities. The analysis was conducted in April 2023. This rigorous review has identified four primary themes.

• • Digital infrastructure and inequalities

• • Digital inclusion of vulnerable groups;

• • Digital services in mobility;

• • FRTs and human rights.

2.2. Step 2: discussions

From the identified themes, the author has prepared an interactive presentation consisting of quizzes, videos, open questions, photos, and texts as listed in Tables 2 and 3. This part of the workshop lasted for 60 min. As the presentation progressed, the participants were encouraged to interact and contribute to the discussions via their smartphones through the ahaslideFootnote ¹ platform. Figure 2 shows some of the answers that were collected through the platform during the workshop. This interaction allowed participants to contribute to the presentation prepared by the author through answers to quizzes, contributions on various themes, answers to open questions, and so forth. Participants could also react verbally by raising their hands to elaborate on a response given through the platform or share a thought. This interaction enriched the themes identified by the author, with ideas, experiences, perspectives, questions, and issues.

Figure 2. Some of the responses to questions 2 and 4 collected during the workshop (Source: Authors).

Table 2. List of questions and quizzes used for the first part of the workshop

Table 3. List of videos used for the first part of the workshop

2.3. Step 3: recommendations

The present section was allotted a duration of 30 min for the purpose of devising recommendations in response to the concerns brought up in the initial segment. Each participant was separately asked to pen their suggestions on post-it notes, in alignment with the predetermined themes, and subsequently present them to the remaining participants for further discussion. Table 4 provides the number of participants who made contributions based on each theme, with these recommendations specifically targeting local government bodies. Figure 3 depicts the various stages of the workshop through photographic representations. The images capture the different steps of the workshop in a visually compelling manner. The photographs are arranged in a sequential order, showcasing the progression of the workshop from start to finish. This visual representation makes it easier to understand the different stages of the workshop and grasp the overall process.

Figure 3. Pictures illustrating the progress of the different stages of the workshop (Source: Authors).

Table 4. Repartition of participants’ contributions according to each theme

3.1. Digital infrastructure and digital inequalities

The deployment of digital technologies in cities relies strongly on digital infrastructure. Indeed, to connect devices and people across the African continent, it is necessary to deploy and secure, qualitative, and affordable digital infrastructure.

Digital infrastructure includes network infrastructure (backbone, wired infrastructure, datacenters, etc.), which allows objects and devices to be connected to each other. Their efficiency and speed enable the use of advanced technologies such as IoT and all connected devices (sensors) that report measurements, provide alerts, and allow remote actions to be taken.

Although the digital infrastructure in Africa is increasing rapidly, closing the digital gap with the rest of the world (Abdychev et al., Reference Abdychev, Cangul, Diouf, Esham, Gupta, Li, Mitra, Miyajima, Ongley, Ouattara, Ouedraogo, Sharma, Fernando, Tapsoba and Woldemichael2020), with the fiber optic network growing from 278,056 km in 2009 to 1 million kilometer in June 2019 (Traoré et al., Reference Traoré, Yawson, Floyd and Mittal2022), and the deployment of various types of sensors in African cities, a significant gap remains, with around 900 million people lacking access to the Internet (UN-Habitat, 2021). This leads to digital inequalities such as the digital divide, which goes beyond simple Internet access and use to encompass the outcomes linked to Internet use by different social groups in a given territory (Alzouma, Reference Alzouma2005; Gilbert, Reference Gilbert2010; Robinson et al., Reference Robinson, Schulz, Dunn, Casilli, Tubaro, Carvath, Chen, Wiest, Dodel, Stern, Ball, Huang, Blank, Ragnedda, Ono, Hogan, Mesch, Cotten, Kretchmer, Hale, Drabowicz, Yan, Wellman, Harper, Quan-Haase and Khilnani2020b; Ferreira et al., Reference Ferreira, Vale, Miguel Carmo, Encalada-Abarca and Marcolin2021).

This digital divide represents a significant human and economic loss for cities and territories in Africa, and research has shown that the number of Internet users positively affects the inclusive growth of economies (Abdychev et al., Reference Abdychev, Cangul, Diouf, Esham, Gupta, Li, Mitra, Miyajima, Ongley, Ouattara, Ouedraogo, Sharma, Fernando, Tapsoba and Woldemichael2020; Ndubuisi et al., Reference Ndubuisi, Otioma and Tetteh2021; Kouladoum, Reference Kouladoum2023), which can be characterized as both spatial and socioeconomic (Nijman and Wei, Reference Nijman and Wei2020). Indeed, the deployment of digital infrastructure reproduces spatial inequalities, thus enriching the multiscale spatial divide between cities and peripheries, metropolises and secondary cities, cities, and rural areas, as well as developed and less developed countries (Ramalingam, Reference Ramalingam2016; UNESCO, 2016; Otioma et al., Reference Otioma, Madureira and Martinez2019).

In the city and rural areas, the infrastructure gap accentuates the divisions between urban and rural areas due to low or non-existent digital infrastructure coverage (Sagna, Reference Sagna2006; UN-Habitat, 2021). In most African countries, the deployment of digital infrastructure is closely linked to the deployment of basic infrastructure, such as water and electricity distribution networks. As a result, hard-to-reach or sparsely populated rural areas are poorly served by these infrastructures, and populations are unable to access digital services. This is also explained by the low profitability of infrastructure deployment in these areas for telecommunications companies deploying infrastructure. The socioeconomic profile of these populations (lower class) explains this observation, as they are unable to afford such Internet services, which are still too expensive for the poorest sections of the population (Vodoz, Reference Vodoz2010).

Consequently, migration from rural to urban areas is increasing. Another consequence is the loss of economic opportunities for rural dwellers, and the difficulty of access to quality education or any digital-related services enjoyed by urban dwellers (Aruleba and Jere, Reference Aruleba and Jere2022).

At the city level, the spatial divide is widened by the deployment of digital infrastructure, with weak or absent connectivity in certain outlying districts and informal settlements (Otioma et al., Reference Otioma, Madureira and Martinez2019; UN-Habitat, 2021). Governance of digital infrastructure projects may be one of the reasons for this disparity. Indeed, in most African countries, telecommunications companies that belong to the private sector deploy digital infrastructures (de Feydeau et al., Reference de Feydeau, Menski and Perry2022).

These private companies are guided primarily by the quest for profitability, and will primarily deploy their services in areas where populations are in a position to access them financially. Service providers tend to focus on those who can afford to pay for their services, accentuating disparities between areas and neighborhoods.

This spatial divide has a strong impact on the digital inclusion of vulnerable groups, who find it harder to access digital services and related economic opportunities in urban areas. The digital divide to which population groups are concentrated in precarious neighborhoods is subject to a feedback loop effect, where the infrastructure deficit condemns them to live in these affordable spaces but limits the economic opportunities offered by digital infrastructures (Ramalingam, Reference Ramalingam2016). In reference to the Matthew effect, vulnerable groups in neighborhoods with poor digital infrastructure are increasingly excluded from advantaged classes, widening the gap between the rich and poor (Tewathia et al., Reference Tewathia, Kamath and Ilavarasan2020).

This brings us to another aspect of the spatial divide linked to digital infrastructure: gentrification. Digital technology is increasingly being linked to gentrification (Hovik et al., Reference Hovik, Giannoumis, Reichborn-Kjennerud, Ruano, Mcshane and Legard2022). By concentrating mainly on city centers, the risk for African cities is that the deployment of digital infrastructure will lead to gentrification, making city centers less accessible to the lower classes, who will retreat to the less served but more affordable outskirts (Tveten, Reference Tveten2018).

Another element arising from a lack of digital infrastructure is the accentuation of social inequalities and social exclusion. The Covid-19 pandemic has demonstrated the damaging consequences of poor quality or non-existent internet, particularly in the education sector, causing many children to be excluded from school (Radoine et al., Reference Radoine, Sietchiping, Yakubu, Jieutsa, Karani, Owuor and Benaomar2022). For example, school closures in Kenya have affected 18 million children (Radoine et al., Reference Radoine, Sietchiping, Yakubu, Jieutsa, Karani, Owuor and Benaomar2022). The lack of infrastructure also affects the distribution of essential urban services. New technologies are a great way to innovate the distribution of essential urban services in Africa, but the majority of innovative digital solutions require a quality infrastructure network. Poorly served areas, although the most concerning by these solutions, are unfortunately the most excluded because they are poorly served.

3.2. Digital inclusion of vulnerable groups

The digital revolution like several other revolutions before it has created winners and losers (Ramalingam, Reference Ramalingam2016). Although the rapid deployment of technologies has created opportunities for many vulnerable groups, this digital revolution has also brought about unequal access to technologies (Ndoya and Asongu, Reference Ndoya and Asongu2022). The increasing deployment of digital technologies in cities places additional pressure on vulnerable groups that are most exposed to the negative impacts of the digital transformation of cities (UN-Habitat, 2021). These groups include the elderly, women, at-risk children and youth, refugees, mentally and physically disabled, illiterate people, and local language speakers.

Therefore, in increasingly connected and digital cities, the issue of digital inclusion is emerging as essential (Livingstone and Helsper, Reference Livingstone and Helsper2007; Robinson et al., Reference Robinson, Ragnedda and Schulz2020a; Mubarak and Suomi, Reference Mubarak and Suomi2022; Radoine et al., Reference Radoine, Sietchiping, Yakubu, Jieutsa, Karani, Owuor and Benaomar2022). Digital inclusion is a term that goes beyond mere provision of digital technology. This emphasizes the importance of providing technologies with the aim of benefiting the targeted population by meeting their requirements and needs. Digital inclusion reinforces the relevance, affordability, and sustainability of digital technologies, leading users to expand their skills and knowledge, and therefore empowering them within the Information Society (IS) (Pitula and Radhakrishnan, Reference Pitula and Radhakrishnan2007; UN-Habitat, 2021; Kanobe et al., Reference Kanobe, Ademolu Ajigini, Ssebuggwawo, Alexandra Nantogo, Mukosi and Moyane2022).

Another phenomenon occurring simultaneously with the digital revolution is the aging of the population. Older people are particularly anxious about digital technologies and find it difficult to integrate them fully into the booming digital ecosystem (Kanobe et al., Reference Kanobe, Ademolu Ajigini, Ssebuggwawo, Alexandra Nantogo, Mukosi and Moyane2022; Mubarak and Suomi, Reference Mubarak and Suomi2022). For instance, studies have shown that up to 27% of the older urban population lacks Internet connectivity (UN-Habitat, 2021). In addition, the significant digital divide and, more spherically, the lack of digital skills and literacy among the elderly contributes to the digital exclusion of this population group (Bothma et al., Reference Bothma, du Plessis, Erasmus, Hoffman, van Rensburg, Ntombela, Oduaran, Roos, Segalo, van der Vaart, van Greunen, Roos and Hoffman2022; Mubarak and Suomi, Reference Mubarak and Suomi2022). Consequently, they are excluded from basic services and social connections (Kanobe et al., Reference Kanobe, Ademolu Ajigini, Ssebuggwawo, Alexandra Nantogo, Mukosi and Moyane2022). Indeed, in cities undergoing digital transformation, the elderly struggle to independently access several urban services. This includes healthcare, administrative services, mobility services, and so on. Already very vulnerable by their state of health and low economic status, the digital transformation of cities further exacerbates the vulnerability of the elderly.

Another vulnerable group worth mentioning is women, as they are at a disadvantage when it comes to using digital technologies: there were 250 million fewer women online than men worldwide. In Africa, the exclusion of women is more prevalent, as only 27% of women use the internet, while 38% of men use it (Kanobe et al., Reference Kanobe, Ademolu Ajigini, Ssebuggwawo, Alexandra Nantogo, Mukosi and Moyane2022). This implies a lack of exposure to opportunities online for women, not only because of the lack of access to the Internet, but also because of the limited knowledge they have to navigate the digital world; an increasing number of jobs require a certain level of knowledge of technologies, which can lead to women (with a lack of digital literacy) having less choice when it comes to choosing their career path.

The digital gap can also be explicitly perceived within the youth; 70% of African youth do not have access to digital technologies (Livingstone and Helsper, Reference Livingstone and Helsper2007). Their exposure to digital technologies is strictly related to whether their schools, communities they live in, and/or families can afford to provide said technologies (Kanobe et al., Reference Kanobe, Ademolu Ajigini, Ssebuggwawo, Alexandra Nantogo, Mukosi and Moyane2022). The COVID-19 crisis, for example, has shown the important role of digital technologies in young people’s access to education and the job market (Radoine et al., Reference Radoine, Sietchiping, Yakubu, Jieutsa, Karani, Owuor and Benaomar2022). Digital exclusion is further reinforced by the difficulty for this group to access information, learn new skill sets, and benefit from recreation and social networking, raising the question of inadequate infrastructure and the affordability of these digital technologies.

People with special needs also suffer from digital exclusion, and according to the World Health Organization, only 5–15% of this group has basic access to assistive technologies, which concerns people with special needs from the Global South. Unfortunately, the lack of access to technology increases the social isolation and marginalization of this group, leading them to miss opportunities to participate in various digital activities in society. Recent technology is progressively becoming integral to modern life for improved quality of life. Therefore, it is imperative that people with special needs learn how to adopt computer technologies to be part of the IS.

Digital exclusion also affects urban refugees; refugees are forced to migrate to foreign countries in which they may not get equal rights, priority, and attention as compared to national citizens. It is obvious that refugees equally require access to and use of the Internet and technology for navigation and communication among themselves and with their relatives and friends. Mobile technology plays a crucial role in saving refugees’ lives during their travel to countries to settle as well as in their integration thereafter (Abujarour, Reference Abujarour2018). It plays a key role in promoting social inclusion, because it allows refugees to participate in society and regain control over their lives. Technological tools can be of great use for communicating with refugees to minimize language barriers during settlement.

In general, Internet and digital technologies play a significant role in reaching equity, innovation, and economic development. It is crucial to allow wider access to these technologies by closing the digital gap for vulnerable groups in order to ensure a better quality of life.

3.3. The disruptive effect of digital services: the e-hailing services

The advent of digital service platforms for housing or mobility, such as Airbnb and Uber, has provided a new shape to service provision in many African cities but has also highlighted the exclusionary power that new digital technologies can have on the most vulnerable.

For example, e-hailing services are booming in several African cities. It is about sourcing for a taxi or other forms of urban mobility using a computer or mobile device (Bah, Reference Bah2016; Contreras and Paz, Reference Contreras and Paz2018; Weru and Mugo, Reference Weru and Mugo2020). Uber was the first digital taxi app to be launched in many African cities (South Africa in 2013, Nigeria in 2014, Ghana in 2016, etc.), and due to its disruptive effect (Elbanna, Reference Elbanna2017), many other applications followed, and ride-hailing apps have even expanded to motorbikes and buses, such as Kenya, and transformed the way people commute in cities (Weru and Mugo, Reference Weru and Mugo2020).

These services have facilitated mobility in cities and created jobs for many people (Henama and Sifolo, Reference Henama and Sifolo2017). However, despite this positive aspect, the advent of e-hailing service platforms like Uber has brought about negative consequences such as unfair competition and threatened the livelihoods of traditional taxis, especially in the context of legal vacuum, to regulate the practice (Contreras and Paz, Reference Contreras and Paz2018; Agyemang, Reference Agyemang2020; Odendaal, Reference Odendaal2020; Ojekere, Reference Ojekere, Ojo and Mkpandiok2022).

Indeed, these services have faced strong tensions, anger, resistance, violence, and contestations through existing conventional taxis in several African cities (Mwaura, Reference Mwaura2016). For instance, Uber drivers have faced different forms of violence. In Casablanca, Morocco, the Uber service withdrew in 2017 in the face of strong protests from taxi drivers, who saw themselves losing their livelihood to this giant. Similar protests have also been observed in South Africa, Ghana, and Kenya, with the corollary being the fear of conventional taxis that their activities would disappear following increasingly significant declines in revenue (Henama and Sifolo, Reference Henama and Sifolo2017). This is also the case in Cameroon with the platform Yango, which was suspended in February 2023, following the grumbling of taxi drivers (Edjo, Reference Edjo2023).

By democratizing taxi services, these e-hailing service platforms threaten the income of conventional taxis whose drivers come from vulnerable social groups (low levels of education and income); hence, this economic xenophobia (Henama and Sifolo, Reference Henama and Sifolo2017). Despite the positive boost to the efficiency of urban services, this technology, like many others, removes the right to the city (Lefebvre, Reference Lefebvre1968) from its vulnerable workforce by empowering and privatizing urban services that are part of an economic and social value chain on which this segment of the population strongly depends (Willis, Reference Willis2019). For Courmont and Le Galès (Reference Courmont and Le Galès2019), many of the questions raised by the new mobility services platforms stem from the indifference of computer codes to the norms laid down by the institutions that govern these spaces (Courmont and Le Galès, Reference Courmont and Le Galès2019).

Therefore, the digital transformation of urban services raises issues of exclusion of vulnerable groups such as taxi drivers, street vendors, or street workers, who have very few options for professional retraining in the event of the loss of their activities. Another issue is the sovereignty of cities and territories over the transformation of urban services, particularly when it poses complex social issues that a purely technological approach cannot respond to (Alzouma, Reference Alzouma2005; Odendaal, Reference Odendaal2020; Woods, Reference Woods2020; Boateng et al., Reference Boateng, Appau and Baako2022).

3.4. FRTs and human rights

Data governance is a major issue in the deployment of digital technology in cities. This raises ethical, security, and privacy issues to which citizens are sensitive. Indeed, according to a study conducted by Ipsos in (2019), two out of three citizens worldwide are distrustful of the use of their personal data.

Personal data refer to information relating to a natural person in terms of identity, health data, places frequented, or any other form of information that enables that person to be identified (Li and Saxunová, Reference Li and Saxunová2020). These data can be collected at any time using technologies such as IoT, and then quickly processed in large amounts using AI. Although it can be used to optimize urban service provision, the use of this data nonetheless raises important societal issues (Tshiani and Tanner, Reference Tshiani and Tanner2021).

In African cities, one technology in particular is increasingly present in public spaces and is fed by personal data: FRT. This is a digital surveillance technology that matches a photograph of a person’s face to a database containing the person’s image, name, and other records already in the database. This technology uses biometric data along with other available information to provide precise and accurate information about a person and his/her behavior (Sarabdeen, Reference Sarabdeen2022).

FRTs are used in African cities for law enforcement, to improve urban security, and to reduce crime. Several African governments have implemented these technologies in their respective cities. The city of Nairobi, for example, has installed around 1,800 high-definition cameras in the city since 2014 (Jili, Reference Jili2022), and Kampala Police invested $126 million in 2019 in closed-circuit televisions in the Ugandan capital (Biryabarema, Reference Biryabarema2019).

Privacy is a fundamental right that includes data privacy (Sarabdeen, Reference Sarabdeen2022). By collecting and using personal information, FRTs violate citizens’ privacy and personal data (Loideain, Reference Loideain2017; Naranjo, Reference Naranjo2020). This technology also lacks transparency in its use, as the data of individuals are taken randomly in public spaces and without concern. Furthermore, the algorithms used to analyze and process the photos and information collected were opaque.

Beyond privacy, the use of these technologies also threatens human rights, reducing individual freedoms and leading to discrimination (Naranjo, Reference Naranjo2020; Dauvergne, Reference Dauvergne2022; Laganà, Reference Laganà2022). In oppressive political regimes, FRTs are used to track activists, protestors, and politicians as in Uganda (Kafeero, Reference Kafeero2020), one of the worst countries in the world for excessive and invasive use of FRTs (Bischoff, Reference Bischoff2021). This practice violates human rights and threatens democratic freedoms (Naranjo, Reference Naranjo2020). This raises the need for a framework or even prohibition of this practice, as mentioned by the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Association and Assembly in his 2019 report presented to the UN General Assembly (Human Rights Council, 2019).

The sovereignty of the cities and territories that deploy this technology is also called into question, because the FRTs used in African cities are imported, mainly from China (Jili, Reference Jili2023). The adoption of this technology in Africa is closely linked to Huawei’s Safe Cities Project (Dauvergne, Reference Dauvergne2022; Jili, Reference Jili2022), which consists of IP-based cameras with Wi-Fi backhaul installed across major grids of the city and connected to a command center, complete with video analytics (Huawei, 2019). In the absence of local technical capacity and technology, African cities do not have control over these technologies or the ability to perform maintenance or absolute control over the data.

The human rights violations posed by these technologies raise the issue of the right to the city (Lefebvre, Reference Lefebvre1968). Indeed, these disruptive technologies restrict freedom and raise the issue of the right smart city in increasingly digital cities (Willis, Reference Willis2019). This highlights the issue of digital rights, which are interpreted as existing human rights that need to be protected in the context of digital technologies (UN-Habitat, 2022). In view of the discriminatory, intrusive and oppressive character, and so forth that these technologies can have on citizens while threatening universal fundamental rights, the right to have digital rights in cities emerges (Calzada, Reference Calzada2021).

With the ever-increasing deployment of technologies in African cities, including FRTs, the question of privacy protection has increased (Makulilo, Reference Makulilo2016). Privacy is recognized as a constitutional right in many African countries and 36 states on the continent have data protection laws, 16 of which have ratified the African Union Convention on Cyber Security and Personal Data Protection, known as the Malabo Convention (Lovells, Reference Lovells2023). Countries such as Ghana, with its Data Protection Act (Act 843); South Africa, with its Protection of Personal Information Act; and many others, protect the privacy of their citizens (Bryant, Reference Bryant2021). However, the rapid development of technologies in cities requires rapid adaptation of regulatory tools and governance mechanisms.

4.1. Prioritize inclusive digital infrastructure for equitable citywide access and local innovation

As digital infrastructures are at the heart of the digital transformation of African cities, local governments must ensure that they are put in place in such a way as to guarantee inclusive access to digital services for all citizens. This is through innovative financing mechanisms that ensure the universal coverage of territories, particularly in peripheral areas and informal settlements. Local governments must, therefore, establish public–private partnerships and social contracts with the private sector and social actors that guarantee an inclusive deployment of digital technologies while guaranteeing economic profitability and social well-being. To guarantee the technological sovereignty of African cities, local governments must implement policies and strategies to allow the accessibility and adaptability of digital infrastructures and technologies by focusing on local innovation. The aim is to promote local innovation ecosystems to boost the production of low-cost technologies adapted to the local context in terms of use and language. By creating digital innovation ecosystems at the local level, local governments can ensure affordable, context-specific digital transformation that meets the needs of citizens while ensuring economic and social development.

4.2. Ensure digital transformation that protects vulnerable urban sectors via inclusive regulations and citizen-centered governance

With regard to technologies that impact access to services such as mobility, housing, social services, and other urban services involving sensitive socioeconomic strata, local governments must be proactive in putting in place policies and regulations that guarantee that the digital transformation of urban services by private actors protects actors in the sector rather than threatening or even eliminating their sources of income. By partnering with trade unions, associations, and other civil society organizations, African city governments must implement norms and regulations based on the social context to protect vulnerable sectors. It is a question of setting up a new social contract that defines inclusive conditions and frameworks for the deployment of technologies that affect sensitive social strata in urban areas. Therefore, these disruptive technologies must be implemented through inclusive governance approaches that give more weight to citizens by putting them at the center of the process. By relying on civil society, local governments must be at the forefront of the deployment of all urban technologies to limit their negative externalities and ensure that they protect the most vulnerable. They must also build capacity and set up monitoring offices with civil society to assess technologies developed by the private sector before their deployment in the urban landscape to limit their negative impacts.

4.3. Protect citizen rights in cities’ digital transformation through inclusive governance and transparent regulations

Technologies deployed in urban areas must preserve citizens’ human rights. FRTs, for example, pose serious challenges to individual freedom. The protection of personal data and the privacy of citizens must be at the heart of the digital transformation of territories in Africa, and local governments must ensure that digital technologies do not infringe upon human rights. Inspired by the cities’ coalition for the digital rights model (UN-Habitat, 2022), local governments must put in place standards and regulations to oversee the deployment of emerging technologies from a people-centered smart cities perspective. The governance of these technologies in urban areas must be done in an inclusive manner by ensuring transparency in the development and use of technologies and the participation and engagement of communities to ensure that technologies serve their needs by integrating issues of equity, diversity, and inclusion. Local governments must also collaborate with civil society actors to assess, monitor, and monitor the evolution of urban technologies to avoid undermining individual freedoms, privacy, and other fundamental human rights. They must also acquire the necessary capacities and put digital public goods and infrastructure in place to ensure that the transformation of territories takes place in an inclusive manner.