Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:45:20.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Ann Dils
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

These papers were originally given as a panel entitled What Constitutes a Dance at the 1989 Congress on Research in Dance Conference in Williamsburg, Virginia. Panelists selected Antony Tudor's 1937 Dark Elegies as a case study and basis for examining general questions regarding elements to be considered in identifying a dance work. Several issues and occurrences inspired panel members, such as recent interest in revivals of dance works from the beginning of this century and scholarly debate about issues related to directing dance from Labanotation scores. While Nelson Goodman's 1968 book Languages of Art served as a theoretical springboard for discussion, Judy Van Zile's 1985–86 article “What is the Dance? Implications for Dance Notation” proved a thought-provoking precedent for this investigation.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , Fall 1992 , pp. 17 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CONSULTED

Burns, Judy. “The Thread That Ran through the Maze: The 1988 DCA Conference on Space.” DCA News, Fall, 1988, pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
Chazin-Bennahum, Judith. “Shedding Light on Dark Elegies” Proceedings of the Society of Dance History Scholars 11th Annual Conference, Feb. 17–19, 1988, pp. 131–144.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968.Google Scholar
Huxley, Michael. “A history of a dance: an analysis of Dark Elegies from written criticism,” in Adshead, Janet, ed. Dance Analysis: Theory and Practice. London: Dance Books, 1988. pp. 141–160.Google Scholar
Laban, Rudolf. Choreutics. London: Macdonald & Evans, 1966.Google Scholar
Royce, Anya P. “Choreology Today: A Review of the Field,” CORD Research Annual VI, 1972, pp. 47–84.Google Scholar
Richardson, Rachel S. “Dark Elegies (1938) Antony Tudor,” in Choreography: Principles and Practice. Report of the Fourth Study of Dance Conference, University of Surrey, Guildford, England, 1986, pp. 206–217.Google Scholar
Topaz, Muriel. “Specifics of Style in the Works of Balanchine and Tudor,” Choreography and Dance, Vol. 1, 1988, 1–36.Google Scholar
Van Zile, Judy. “What is the Dance? Implications for Dance Notation,” Dance Research Journal, Vol. 17, No. 2 and Vol. 18, No. 1, 1985–1986, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar